Time for Truth

[Zeon Mason]

This Oswald chose to ride in the FRONT seat so the cab driver could get a real close up of his face, as well as displaying a gold bracelet on his wrist , which theoretically should have been not that easily visible if he had on an OVERSIZE jacket = sleeves longer than necessary.

There  seems to be a pattern with this Oswald of drawing attention to himself.

1. He bangs on the doors of McWaters bus and he sits for only a couple of minutes and then wants a transfer ticket from McWaters AS he is also interrupting other passenger trying to get ON the bus.

2. He decides to take Whaleys Taxi just AS another woman is about to get the taxi and makes a point of demonstrating himself rather than just stopping himself When he saw the woman. Instead he made a point of “competing”with woman by engaging in unnecessary conversation of asking her if she wanted the cab, then offering it to her.

3. In addition to the Front seat ride, this Oswald person further gave the cab driver an easy reason to recall him by NOT showing any interest in the event that the REST of the WORLD was fixated upon: The assassination of the POTUS. This Oswald remained silent as he sat right next to the cab driver Whaley , even after Whaley asked him about the event.

4. This Oswald person then made  it easy for the boarding room lady Earlene Roberts to be wondering about his behavior by showing NO INTEREST in the reports  of the national emergency event that Roberts herself was watching on the TV .

5. This Oswald then left and took some kind of walking stroll somewhere that did something to attract the attention of DPD officer Tippet just passing by 10th and Patton, enough to cause the cop to slow down and follow him for a while.

6. Then there was the dramatic 4 shots fired by this Oswald at Tippet, in midst of onlooking witness, the final shot being delivered to the head by walking over to the body of Tippet laying on the ground.

7. Then this Oswald did  NOT quickly leave the scene, but walked over CLOSE to Markam kind of casually, and as he took  about another minute at least to  empty revolver shells one by one, discarding them in LOS of several observers at the scene.

8. This Oswald decided then that he should draw as much attention to himself as possible by holding the pistol up  in the air as he began  a trot down the street.

9. Of all the places that this Oswald could have chosen to discard a jacket UNSEEN doing so, he instead chose  a fairly public car lot and threw  the jacket under the car . He thenwalked  out to the MAIN st after he had just gone past several people who saw him just previously with jacket on and/or  saw him throw the jacket under the car.

10. On to Brewers store, where this Oswald stops in just WHEN a police car goes by, and then he just stares at Brewer.

12. On to the theater and into the theater this Oswald went,  at approx 1:30, without stopping by the ticket booth, causing both the ticket girl and Brewer who was still observing him to become suspicious.

13. Butch Burroughs thought he saw some Oswald or clone Oswald buy popcorn at around 1:07. Jack Davis thought he saw an Oswald sit near him about 1:20, then get up and move around several times to different seats. 

14. The late arriving Oswald (1:30) apparently never made contact with the earlier Oswald who bought the popcorn at 1:07, or sat next to the Oswald that Jack Davis saw at 1:20.

15.The final theater scene is an Oswald making a big show of getting arrested, revolver in his hand and several other cops wrestling with him, and then out front of the theater entrance display in a crowd and photographed in his “struggle” of his brown shirt being pulled off.

Conclusion:

If Mr Fords new idea is correct that Oswald was still in Dealey Plaza at 12:40 , given that the man in the “M”   film DOES SEEM to be coincidentally a figure resembling Oswald, then 15 examples indicating a pattern to draw attention unnecessarily to oneself , might be reason to reconsider the Oswald double theory.

[Alan J. Ford]

Mr. von Pein tosses another bogus claim, akin to putting words in the wrongly-accused's mouth ---->

But whether or not Mrs. Roberts was telling the truth about the police car honking its horn outside the roominghouse has no bearing on whether she was telling the truth about seeing Oswald on 11/22, and that's because her story about seeing Oswald that day was verified by Lee Oswald himself, who told the police after his arrest that he had, indeed, gone to his Beckley room shortly after the assassination occurred.

The challenge here for all LNs is they cannot produce any actual phrase that the wrongly-accused is claimed to have said in his own voice. The reason for that is the wrongly-accused never said 99.9% of what he was claimed to have said. LNs parroting back unsubstantiated claims is Not evidence, it's bogus "evidence" amid a hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure.

[Alan J. Ford]

This Oswald chose to ride in the FRONT seat so the cab driver could get a real close up of his face, as well as displaying a gold bracelet on his wrist , which theoretically should have been not that easily visible if he had on an OVERSIZE jacket = sleeves longer than necessary.

There  seems to be a pattern with this Oswald of drawing attention to himself.

1. He bangs on the doors of McWaters bus and he sits for only a couple of minutes and then wants a transfer ticket from McWaters AS he is also interrupting other passenger trying to get ON the bus.

2. He decides to take Whaleys Taxi just AS another woman is about to get the taxi and makes a point of demonstrating himself rather than just stopping himself When he saw the woman. Instead he made a point of “competing”with woman by engaging in unnecessary conversation of asking her if she wanted the cab, then offering it to her.

3. In addition to the Front seat ride, this Oswald person further gave the cab driver an easy reason to recall him by NOT showing any interest in the event that the REST of the WORLD was fixated upon: The assassination of the POTUS. This Oswald remained silent as he sat right next to the cab driver Whaley , even after Whaley asked him about the event.

4. This Oswald person then made  it easy for the boarding room lady Earlene Roberts to be wondering about his behavior by showing NO INTEREST in the reports  of the national emergency event that Roberts herself was watching on the TV .

5. This Oswald then left and took some kind of walking stroll somewhere that did something to attract the attention of DPD officer Tippet just passing by 10th and Patton, enough to cause the cop to slow down and follow him for a while.

6. Then there was the dramatic 4 shots fired by this Oswald at Tippet, in midst of onlooking witness, the final shot being delivered to the head by walking over to the body of Tippet laying on the ground.

7. Then this Oswald did  NOT quickly leave the scene, but walked over CLOSE to Markam kind of casually, and as he took  about another minute at least to  empty revolver shells one by one, discarding them in LOS of several observers at the scene.

8. This Oswald decided then that he should draw as much attention to himself as possible by holding the pistol up  in the air as he began  a trot down the street.

9. Of all the places that this Oswald could have chosen to discard a jacket UNSEEN doing so, he instead chose  a fairly public car lot and threw  the jacket under the car . He thenwalked  out to the MAIN st after he had just gone past several people who saw him just previously with jacket on and/or  saw him throw the jacket under the car.

10. On to Brewers store, where this Oswald stops in just WHEN a police car goes by, and then he just stares at Brewer.

12. On to the theater and into the theater this Oswald went,  at approx 1:30, without stopping by the ticket booth, causing both the ticket girl and Brewer who was still observing him to become suspicious.

13. Butch Burroughs thought he saw some Oswald or clone Oswald buy popcorn at around 1:07. Jack Davis thought he saw an Oswald sit near him about 1:20, then get up and move around several times to different seats. 

14. The late arriving Oswald (1:30) apparently never made contact with the earlier Oswald who bought the popcorn at 1:07, or sat next to the Oswald that Jack Davis saw at 1:20.

15.The final theater scene is an Oswald making a big show of getting arrested, revolver in his hand and several other cops wrestling with him, and then out front of the theater entrance display in a crowd and photographed in his “struggle” of his brown shirt being pulled off.

Conclusion:

If Mr Fords new idea is correct that Oswald was still in Dealey Plaza at 12:40 , given that the man in the “M”   film DOES SEEM to be coincidentally a figure resembling Oswald, then 15 examples indicating a pattern to draw attention unnecessarily to oneself , might be reason to reconsider the Oswald double theory.

An astute observation/assessment, Mr. Mason, so encouraging to read your thoughts, and ditto @ Mr. Weidmann (sp?), Mr. Iacoletti and Mr. Cakebread as well.

LNs will never be able to share an iota of proof what the wrongly-accused is claimed to have said. It's so much easier for them to simply fall in line and parrot back a hastily contrived script of phantom "evidence" mired in the stench of horse manure to frame an innocent party.

[Alan J. Ford]

It's him @ the wrongly-accused's presence down in Dealey Plaza as late as 1:12PM...

Mr. Mentesana (Ernest Charles), an amateur photographer that fateful afternoon captures the wrongly accused standing alongside Bill Shelley (to the wrongly-accused's right) and the arrival of Fire Station 3's big red truck 12-15 yards away from them on Elm Street to the left of the tandem. At one point the wrongly-accused steps to his left to gain a better view of the unfolding situation post-assassination. One thing I have always noticed is how much easier it is for LNs to parrot back claims of what others said the wrongly-accused was claimed to have said, but they retreat rather quickly from the Fact that the wrongly-accused was recorded as saying he stood out front post-assassination with Bill Shelley...

Of course, for them to even admit as much would derail the whole hastily contrived script about fetching a bus and a cab, yada, yada, yada...

Back in a few minutes to pick up the wrongly accused's movements from Dealey Plaza post 1:12PM...nowhere near 10th & Patton, let alone one of the two assailants truly responsible for ambushing Mr. Tippit.

[Alan J. Ford]

In fairness to honest research, I will readily admit I personally do not know how the wrongly-accused truly made his exit from Dealey Plaza post-assassination time sometime after 1:12PM...

That honest admission said, let's move on: Our 1st stop post 1:12PM is at 213 Jefferson, where let's note how Mr. Brewer (Johnny) describes the wrongly-accused ---->

Mr. BREWER. And had brown hair. He had a brown sports shirt on. His
shirt tail was out.
Mr. BELIN. Any jacket?
Mr. BREWEB No.
Mr. BELIN. What color of trousers, do you remember?
Mr. BREWER. I don’t remember.
Mr. BELIN. Light or dark?
Mr. BREWER. I don’t remember that either.
Mr. BELIN. Any other clothing that you noticed?
Mr. BREWER. He had a T-shirt underneath his shirt.
Mr. BELIN. Was his shirt buttoned up all the way?
Mr. BREWER. A couple of buttons were unbuttoned at the time.


Sound familiar folks @ the 1:12PM post-assassination photo down in Dealey Plaza @ unmistakably "Brown" coloured shirt; and, the icing on the cake conjures up the wrongly-accused's unique style of wearing that brown coloured shirt with, Quote, "A couple of buttons were unbuttoned at the time."

Let's now move on further up the street to 231 Jefferson Avenue...and learn what Julia Postal at the Texas Theatre observes about the colour and manner of wear of this same brown shirt...

[Alan J. Ford]

Julia Postal's observation of the wrongly-accused's brown coloured shirt and manner worn ---->

Mr. Ball. Outside his pants?
Mrs. Postal. Uh-huh.
Mr. Ball. Wasn't tucked into his pants?
Mrs. Postal. Huh-uh.
Mr. Ball. When he went in was it tucked in his pants when he went in?
Mrs. Postal. No, sir; because I remember he came flying around the corner, because his hair was and shirt was kind of waving.
Mr. Ball. And his shirt was out?
Mrs. Postal. Uh-huh.
Mr. Ball. You say——
Mrs. Postal. It was hanging out.

Sounds familiar folks @ same brown shirt colour and manner of wear in now three places (Dealey Plaza post-assassination @ 1:12PM; 213 Jefferson and now 231 Jefferson at the Texas Theatre as well)

In fairness to those of you who may be reading along and have already progressed to the 4th scene (being escorted out of the Texas Theatre in the same brown shirt worn in the same manner in Dealey Plaza, 213 Jefferson and 231 Jefferson) let's stop here today and further examine the importance of WC Exhibit 150 later this week the Good Lord willing with several more instances along the wrongly-accused's progression from Dealey Plaza post-assassination @ 1:12PM to his donning the same brown shirt worn in the same manner all day long (post-assassination to his midnight-presser). In each instance note the manner the shirt is worn (Mr. Brewer and Miss Postal both confirm Mr. Mentesana's photo capture in Dealey Plaza post assassination @ 1:12PM, and the examples shared later this week will do the same)

The wrongly accused didn't shoot anybody. Anybody.

It's amazing what some people will do & say for thirty pieces of silver amid a hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure to frame an innocent man.

Bunch of lying treasonous cowards.

[Zeon Mason]

Since the reddish brown shirt that was worn by the Oswald who may be out front on the entrance steps of TSBD was NOT the shirt that the Oswald who was arrested in Texas theater had  on, a tangled web had be conceived.

It is  the WC web and it gets   ever more convoluted as each incremental  segment of the alleged Oswald the Lone Nut trek from the SN 6th floor of TSBD to the Texas theater is analyzed.

Just the the jacket dilemma itself upsets the equation because how could the blue gray jacket wind up being found in the TSBD Domino room a month later if that was the blue gray jacket that Oswald was supposedly wearing when he left the TSBD and the jacket which he was supposed to have on when he got into Whaleys taxi?

How is it that Bledsoe could see a hole in the elbow sleeve of the brown shirt that the Oswald who allegedly got on Mcwatters bus was wearing, if Oswald had on the blue gray jacket?

Rolled up the jacket sleeves but left the brown shirt sleeves down?  It’s absurd.

It’s pointless to even to try to explain it since Bledsoe did NOT say she saw Oswald wearing any jacket, She just saw ( she claims) Oswald on the bus wearing a brown shirt and noticed the “hole” in the elbow sleeve.

But that’s ridiculous too,  because THAT shirt, could NOT be the shirt Oswald was wearing, because that shirt he did not have on until AFTER he put it on at the boarding room.( he changed from the reddish brown solid shirt to the brown shirt with hole in the sleeve).

And this is all before getting to the anomaly of Earlene Roberts NOT seeing either a red/brown shirt OR a jacket on the Oswald who entered the boarding house at 1:00pm.