Who Killed J.D. Tippit?

[Zeon Mason]

 
The shooter has to have looked very similar to Oswald given the number of witness willing to identify Oswald.

So either A. the shooter was Oswald or B. the shooter resembled Oswald enough to be mistaken as Oswald by  several witnesses.

If A. What reasons to shoot  Tippet?

LN reason: Oswald was crazy , having just shot JFK earlier.
CT reason: Oswald was paranoid and feared for his life after he realized he was probably being set up.

If B, What reasons to shoot Tippet?

LN reason: None because there’s no doubt the shooter was Oswald, therefore option B. Is a false choice.
CT reasons:
1. Since a shooter resembling Oswald so remarkably defies random probability therefore the shooting of Tippet was a planned event by an imposter to further set up Oswald as part of a larger conspiracy.
2. The imposters intent was exclusively a personal vendetta to frame Oswald and the conspiracy limited to only himself or just a few persons.
3. A combination of 1&2 , a larger conspiratorial group with the shooter having also a personal vendetta against Oswald.

[Mike Orr]

The firing pin on Oswalds revolver was defective and would not have been able to fire . Automatic shells were also found at the Tippit crime scene . A wallet of Oswalds was found at the Tippit shooting scene . Oswalds hand gun was a revolver not an " Automatic " .

[John Mytton]

The firing pin on Oswalds revolver was defective and would not have been able to fire . Automatic shells were also found at the Tippit crime scene . A wallet of Oswalds was found at the Tippit shooting scene . Oswalds hand gun was a revolver not an " Automatic " .

The firing pin on Oswalds [sic] revolver was defective and would not have been able to fire .

Cite?

Btw the killer was seen by several eyewitnesses unloading his gun. The gun that Oswald was arrested with was an exclusive match to the shells found at the scene, which proves beyond all doubt that Oswald's weapon was good enough to produce the matching shells.

When the police arrived Ishowed [sic] one of them where I saw this man emptying his gun and we found a shell.
Barbara Jeanette Davis affidavit 22/11/63

I saw the boy cutting across our yard and he was unloading his gun
Mrs. Virginia Davis affidavit 22/11/63

Mr. BELIN - Well, did you see the man empty his gun?
Mr. BENAVIDES - That is what he was doing. He took one out and threw it.

Automatic shells were also found at the Tippit crime scene .

The eyewitnesses saw the Killer manually unload the gun and that's not the way an automatic gun works. And another fact worth noting is that the killer shot Tippit from a close range and the shells were found relatively far away and automatic guns don't send shells that far. Sorry bout that.

A wallet of Oswalds [sic] was found at the Tippit shooting scene .

Well Mike, that's good evidence proving Oswald was there.

Oswalds [sic] hand gun was a revolver not an " Automatic " .

Yep, you got that right. And the Killer who was positively ID'd as Lee Harvey Oswald was seen manually unloading his weapon with shells that were found at the scene and those very shells were an exclusive match to the revolver Oswald was arrested with and it was also the same weapon that Oswald was using when he tried to kill more arresting Officers at the Texas Theatre! Geez Louise it all fits, an open and shut case as they say in the classics!

JohnM

[John Mytton]

The shooter has to have looked very similar to Oswald given the number of witness willing to identify Oswald.

So either A. the shooter was Oswald or B. the shooter resembled Oswald enough to be mistaken as Oswald by  several witnesses.

If A. What reasons to shoot  Tippet?

LN reason: Oswald was crazy , having just shot JFK earlier.
CT reason: Oswald was paranoid and feared for his life after he realized he was probably being set up.

If B, What reasons to shoot Tippet?

LN reason: None because there’s no doubt the shooter was Oswald, therefore option B. Is a false choice.
CT reasons:
1. Since a shooter resembling Oswald so remarkably defies random probability therefore the shooting of Tippet was a planned event by an imposter to further set up Oswald as part of a larger conspiracy.
2. The imposters intent was exclusively a personal vendetta to frame Oswald and the conspiracy limited to only himself or just a few persons.
3. A combination of 1&2 , a larger conspiratorial group with the shooter having also a personal vendetta against Oswald.

Hi Zeon, the Officers name was "Tippit" not "Tippet".

JohnM

[Walt Cakebread]

JohnM

MR Mytton.... Do you understand that there is a DIFFERENCE between  SHOOTING a revolver and  EXTRACTING THE SPENT SHELLS from a revolver?    Firing the revolver would deposit reside from the burning gunpowder on the OUTSIDE of the hand holding the revolver ...... And EXTRACTING the spent shells into the palm of the hand would deposit burned gunpowder debris into the PALM of the hand.     

Lee Oswald DID NOT have any burned gun powder on the PALM of his hand, therefore he did NOT empty any spent shells into his hand.

DO YOU UNDER STAND??   

[Martin Weidmann]

MR Mytton.... Do you understand that there is a DIFFERENCE between  SHOOTING a revolver and  EXTRACTING THE SPENT SHELLS from a revolver?    Firing the revolver would deposit reside from the burning gunpowder on the OUTSIDE of the hand holding the revolver ...... And EXTRACTING the spent shells into the palm of the hand would deposit burned gunpowder debris into the PALM of the hand.     

Lee Oswald DID NOT have any burned gun powder on the PALM of his hand, therefore he did NOT empty any spent shells into his hand.

DO YOU UNDER STAND??   

Forget Mytton, Walt, he's a complete waste of time.

When they found no traces on Oswald's cheek (where it should have been if he fired a rifle) they argued that these tests are unreliable.

Oswald could have washed his hands and the test would show up positive. It's a complete waste of time, but it exposes just how disingenuous these LN freaks are.

[Walt Cakebread]

Forget Mytton, Walt, he's a complete waste of time.

When they found no traces on Oswald's cheek (where it should have been if he fired a rifle) they argued that these tests are unreliable.

Oswald could have washed his hands and the test would show up positive. It's a complete waste of time, but it exposes just how disingenuous these LN freaks are.

how disingenuous these LN freaks are.

Is it possible for an intelligent and reasoning person to believe the crap they post?