Challenge to Cyril Wecht

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Challenge to Cyril Wecht  (Read 25046 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Challenge to Cyril Wecht
« Reply #14 on: April 16, 2023, 05:14:38 AM »
Nothing here casts an iota of doubt to rebut the mountain of evidence and circumstances that link Oswald to this crime.

LOL

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Challenge to Cyril Wecht
« Reply #15 on: April 16, 2023, 05:38:12 AM »
When the FBI tried to duplicate the shots, they needed to add 3 shims to the scope to even hit the target. A sharpshooter would NEVER use a misaligned scope, especially if he planned to assassinate the POTUS.

So, the answer is no, it would not have been impossible to kill someone with that MC, however, hitting a moving target 2 of 3 times including a headshot at 88 yards, looking thru the wonky scope of a crap rifle is so improbable we should be able to rule it out, like Wecht does.

Those shots were easy

Online Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Challenge to Cyril Wecht
« Reply #16 on: April 16, 2023, 06:12:29 AM »
Those shots were easy

With a grossly misaligned scope? Good luck with that. This isn't a spaghetti western and besides Oswald could not have taken those shots anyway and the MC was already planted by then. The DPD really dropped the ball when they didn't sight-in the scope before planting the rifle. They did shoot a few rounds into a swimming pool so they could retrieve the magic bullet and plant it on the wrong stretcher at the hospital. They needed a pristine bullet to magically show up that matched the ballistics of the MC. Yeah, the pristine bullet in your avatar, which is just ever so slightly deformed from striking the bottom of the pool. They made Guido jump in and go after it but nobody realized he couldn't swim ..but that's another story.


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Challenge to Cyril Wecht
« Reply #17 on: April 16, 2023, 06:47:45 AM »
With a grossly misaligned scope? Good luck with that. This isn't a spaghetti western and besides Oswald could not have taken those shots anyway and the MC was already planted by then. The DPD really dropped the ball when they didn't sight-in the scope before planting the rifle. They did shoot a few rounds into a swimming pool so they could retrieve the magic bullet and plant it on the wrong stretcher at the hospital. They needed a pristine bullet to magically show up that matched the ballistics of the MC. Yeah, the pristine bullet in your avatar, which is just ever so slightly deformed from striking the bottom of the pool. They made Guido jump in and go after it but nobody realized he couldn't swim ..but that's another story.

All you're doing is kissing Oswald's arse
Oswald got what he deserved


Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
Re: Challenge to Cyril Wecht
« Reply #18 on: April 16, 2023, 02:29:51 PM »
With a grossly misaligned scope? Good luck with that. This isn't a spaghetti western and besides Oswald could not have taken those shots anyway and the MC was already planted by then. The DPD really dropped the ball when they didn't sight-in the scope before planting the rifle. They did shoot a few rounds into a swimming pool so they could retrieve the magic bullet and plant it on the wrong stretcher at the hospital. They needed a pristine bullet to magically show up that matched the ballistics of the MC. Yeah, the pristine bullet in your avatar, which is just ever so slightly deformed from striking the bottom of the pool. They made Guido jump in and go after it but nobody realized he couldn't swim ..but that's another story.

False premise.  You have no idea what condition the scope was in at the time Oswald fired the shots.  Even if you repeat this claim over and over again, it does not make it true.  You are confusing your subjective desire for it to be true with a fact.  And, of course, it wasn't even necessary for Oswald to have used the scope to commit this crime. 

Online Sean Kneringer

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
Re: Challenge to Cyril Wecht
« Reply #19 on: April 16, 2023, 05:38:11 PM »
LHO did not use it to assassinate JFK.

Two of the bullets were definitively matched to the Carcano, so someone used that allegedly crappy rifle.

Online Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Challenge to Cyril Wecht
« Reply #20 on: April 16, 2023, 05:59:26 PM »
False premise.  You have no idea what condition the scope was in at the time Oswald fired the shots.  Even if you repeat this claim over and over again, it does not make it true.  You are confusing your subjective desire for it to be true with a fact.  And, of course, it wasn't even necessary for Oswald to have used the scope to commit this crime. 
You wouldn't know a false premise if it bit you in the arse. The false premise is that you assume the scope was in alignment during the shooting and wound up grossly misaligned once the FBI got hold of it. If the FBI said the scope required 3 shims to even hit the target you can't assume that the scope was ever aligned to fit your narrative. That's the false premise, dufus.

Otherwise, all you have is a lonely palm print on the barrel that allegedly matches Oswald, with much less certainty than the 14 point match of Malcolm Wallace's print found on a box on the 6th floor of the TSBD. But the FBI laughed it off, like you do, and simply responded with "Not a match".

You have nothing. There is zero evidence that Oswald shot that rifle and plenty of evidence that he didn't. No prints. Wonky scope. No gunshot residue. And there wasn't even a valid trajectory from the 6th floor, into JFK's back and out his throat. Sorry to back up my premises with facts. You should try it some time.