“Something to think about”

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: “Something to think about”  (Read 19423 times)

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
Re: “Something to think about”
« Reply #14 on: February 24, 2023, 01:31:30 PM »
Yes, he was a narcissist who was worried about his daughter getting a new pair of shoes while in police custody.

If Oswald was worried about his daughter (or the young children of the two men who he murdered) he would not have committed the crime in the first place. 

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: “Something to think about”
« Reply #15 on: February 24, 2023, 02:00:02 PM »
If Oswald was worried about his daughter (or the young children of the two men who he murdered) he would not have committed the crime in the first place.


 Thumb1:

Offline Michael Walton

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 467
Re: “Something to think about”
« Reply #16 on: February 24, 2023, 02:08:03 PM »
If Oswald was worried about his daughter (or the young children of the two men who he murdered) he would not have committed the crime in the first place.

Duh, it goes both ways. Oswald didn't know he was going to be set up as a patsy for the murder. So of course an innocent man would be worried about his kid getting new shoes. They probably had already talked about it before he was falsely arrested. Duh.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: “Something to think about”
« Reply #17 on: February 24, 2023, 02:36:35 PM »
Duh, it goes both ways. Oswald didn't know he was going to be set up as a patsy for the murder. So of course an innocent man would be worried about his kid getting new shoes. They probably had already talked about it before he was falsely arrested. Duh.


He talked about it with Marina and left her most of the money that he had.

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
Re: “Something to think about”
« Reply #18 on: February 24, 2023, 03:02:07 PM »
Duh, it goes both ways. Oswald didn't know he was going to be set up as a patsy for the murder. So of course an innocent man would be worried about his kid getting new shoes. They probably had already talked about it before he was falsely arrested. Duh.

He was so worried about his wife and kids that he was trying to ship them back to Russia.  LOL.   Oswald didn't give a hoot about them.  He forever placed them under a black cloud due to their connection with him and his murderous legacy.  They had to live their entire lives with that unfair notoriety. 

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1400
Re: “Something to think about”
« Reply #19 on: February 24, 2023, 03:18:52 PM »
At the end of the day, we're all speculating. I just wish some would be more humble and admit that it's not possible to know with absolute certainty that others weren't involved or what Oswald's motives were if he did in fact do it alone...

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
Re: “Something to think about”
« Reply #20 on: February 24, 2023, 03:27:54 PM »
At the end of the day, we're all speculating. I just wish some would be more humble and admit that it's not possible to know with absolute certainty that others weren't involved or what Oswald's motives were if he did in fact do it alone...

Absolute certainty is an unreasonable standard in human affairs.  No conclusion could ever be reached if absolute certainty is the standard. Oswald himself probably couldn't articulate his motive with absolute certainty.  His act was not a rational one.  What we have is the evidence.  And the evidence links Oswald to this crime beyond doubt.  There is no credible evidence in nearly six decades that links any other person to this crime.