When the SN was built

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: When the SN was built  (Read 110517 times)

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: When the SN was built
« Reply #231 on: February 12, 2023, 11:32:52 PM »

Mr. Rowland will have said plenty of things in that interview that didn't make the final 'cut'. This is the case with all such documents. Are all such documents, because they are selective as to which items make the final interview report, inaccurate records of the interviews?


Mr. Rowland had the opportunity to make any corrections when he signed the document on 11/24/63. He signed it as being accurate,

Insofar as it contained no positive misrepresentations of what he'd said, it was accurate. There were no corrections to be made

Quote
his wife confirms that he didn't say anything about an elderly black man on the sixth floor at that meeting.

At the meeting where FBI agents were dressed as police officers and "brought a written statement and asked him if that was in general what he had to say"? That one?

Quote
Mr. Rowland had another opportunity to say the document was inaccurate when he testified to the WC, but instead he confirms again that it is accurate. Yet you choose to believe otherwise. Could it possibly be due to your bias? Hmm, sure seems that way to me.



She's just said this, lol:

Mr. BELIN. Were you present when he was with the police officers?
Mrs. ROWLAND. At times.



That was a general question about several interviews. When it came specifically to the 11/24/63 interview Mrs. Rowland said:

Mr. BELIN.  On Sunday morning, November 24th?
Mrs. ROWLAND.  Yes.
Mr. BELIN.  Were you personally with him throughout the time that he was with the police officers?
Mrs. ROWLAND.  Yes.
Mr. BELIN.  And he, in your presence, never said that he saw anyone on the sixth floor other than the man with the rifle?
Mrs. ROWLAND.  No. He never said in my presence that there was another man other than the man with the rifle on the sixth floor.

She is confusing visits. Mr. Rowland did not give a statement to FBI agents pretending to be police officers

 Thumb1:

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: When the SN was built
« Reply #232 on: February 12, 2023, 11:42:47 PM »
Insofar as it contained no positive misrepresentations of what he'd said, it was accurate. There were no corrections to be made

At the meeting where FBI agents were dressed as police officers and "brought a written statement and asked him if that was in general what he had to say"? That one?

She is confusing visits. Mr. Rowland did not give a statement to FBI agents pretending to be police officers

 Thumb1:


Now, you are just being silly.

 Like I said regarding the sound of the siren of the ambulance. You find some insignificant detail, misrepresent it, and act like you have obliterated the whole argument. Why the heck would anyone believe anything you have to say?

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: When the SN was built
« Reply #233 on: February 12, 2023, 11:53:17 PM »

Now, you are just being silly.

 Like I said regarding the sound of the siren of the ambulance. You find some insignificant detail, misrepresent it, and act like you have obliterated the whole argument. Why the heck would anyone believe anything you have to say?

~Grin~

If you were gunning for Mrs. Rowland the way you've been gunning for Mr. Rowland, you would be using this "insignificant detail" (police officers = FBI agents!) to blow up her credibility. Because that's how you work in your indefatigable defense of the official story.

I, for my part, have no interest in blowing up Mrs. Rowland's credibility (she just got confused between visits), but I am rather enjoying the spectacle of you blowing up yours

 Thumb1:

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: When the SN was built
« Reply #234 on: February 13, 2023, 12:11:29 AM »
~Grin~

If you were gunning for Mrs. Rowland the way you've been gunning for Mr. Rowland, you would be using this "insignificant detail" (police officers = FBI agents!) to blow up her credibility. Because that's how you work in your indefatigable defense of the official story.

I, for my part, have no interest in blowing up Mrs. Rowland's credibility (she just got confused between visits), but I am rather enjoying the spectacle of you blowing up yours

 Thumb1:


So, now you are claiming that police officers made a separate interview, but there is no record or evidence of this “visit”?  ???

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: When the SN was built
« Reply #235 on: February 13, 2023, 12:27:19 AM »

So, now you are claiming that police officers made a separate interview, but there is no record or evidence of this “visit”?  ???

Mrs. Rowland talks about police officers coming with a pre-written statement and going over it with her husband. Key witnesses were visited multiple times by law enforcement; not every visit was formally written up.

With a little help from Mr. Belin, she's mixing this visit up with an F.B.I. visit.

 Thumb1:

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: When the SN was built
« Reply #236 on: February 13, 2023, 12:37:06 AM »
Mrs. Rowland talks about police officers coming with a pre-written statement and going over it with her husband. Key witnesses were visited multiple times by law enforcement; not every visit was formally written up.

With a little help from Mr. Belin, she's mixing this visit up with an F.B.I. visit.

 Thumb1:


I think you are just making stuff up again. They are specifically discussing the 11/24/63 FBI interview documented by CE 358. Not some other “mysterious visit” that is nothing more than a figment of your imagination.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: When the SN was built
« Reply #237 on: February 13, 2023, 12:48:34 AM »

I think you are just making stuff up again. They are specifically discussing the 11/24/63 FBI interview documented by CE 358. Not some other “mysterious visit” that is nothing more than a figment of your imagination.

Nope! You're just confused. And the reason you're confused is you haven't done your homework.

Mr. Rowland: ... [T]he next day on Saturday there were a pair of FBI officers, agents out at my home, and they took another handwritten statement from me which I signed again, and this was basically the same. At that time I told them I did see the Negro man there and they told me it didn't have any bearing or such on the case right then. In fact, they just the same as told me to forget it now.

He is talking about a Saturday visit by two FBI men who did not come merely to go over an already written statement. (He may be talking here of Agents Rice & Almon.) The visit by police officers which Mrs. Rowland recalls was a different visit. As was the Sunday FBI visit.

Mr. Rowland was visited multiple times by law enforcement. Mrs. Rowland was not present for all of these interviews.

 Thumb1: