JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
LNers Can't Explain the Two Back-of-Head Bullet Fragments
Joe Elliott:
--- Quote from: Tim Nickerson on January 13, 2023, 09:01:49 AM ---
It's not an artifact, and it's not on the back of the skull. It's the 7 x 2 mm fragment that Humes removed from behind the right eye.
--- End quote ---
That lateral X-ray helps a lot. Thank you.
Question:
Do we have regular photographs of the fragment that Humes removed?
Preferably from different angles?
Joe Elliott:
--- Quote from: Jerry Organ on January 13, 2023, 05:40:42 PM ---Here's how one researcher tried to explain the roundness of the 7x2 mm fragment.
--- End quote ---
I take it that we just have the one view of the actual fragment?
I think this play-do model looks about right. The "round" object wasn't really all that round.
SPersonivan was mistaken about this just being an artifact. But I don't think it was a disk like object as is generally interpreted. It was just an irregularly shaped fragment. So it appears to be much ado about nothing.
Tim Nickerson:
https://www.patspeer.com/chapter-18b-more-fun-with-x-rays
Joe Elliott:
--- Quote from: Tim Nickerson on January 14, 2023, 12:40:35 AM ---
https://www.patspeer.com/chapter-18b-more-fun-with-x-rays
--- End quote ---
An interesting article by Pat Speer. It is a complex subject.
Joe Elliott:
--- Quote from: Jerry Organ on January 13, 2023, 05:40:42 PM ---Here's how one researcher tried to explain the roundness of the 7x2 mm fragment.
--- End quote ---
Just to ask again, are these the only images we have of the 7x2 mm fragment, this gray object below the orange play-doh model in both the left and right photos?
Unless I see this fragment from other angles that proves otherwise, I think this fragment is the object visible in the two X-rays of JFK, from the front and the side.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version