LNers Can't Explain the Two Back-of-Head Bullet Fragments

Author Topic: LNers Can't Explain the Two Back-of-Head Bullet Fragments  (Read 97946 times)

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1950
Re: LNers Can't Explain the Two Back-of-Head Bullet Fragments
« Reply #256 on: July 24, 2025, 05:56:52 AM »
Advertisement
You keep repeating this false claim without addressing the contrary facts that I've presented to you. Dr. Olivier himself, the guy who conducted that test, said the FMJ bullets only broke up into a few fragments. The test skull x-rays alone debunk your claim, but you just keep ignoring them. Those x-rays also strongly suggest that those "40 or so fragments" did not all come from one bullet but from several bullets. And, the fragmentation pattern from the Edgewood Arsenal test bullets bears no resemblance to the pattern we see in the JFK skull x-rays.

Mr. SPECTER. I now hand you a photograph marked Commission Exhibit 859 and ask you what that depicts?
Dr. OLIVIER. These are the smaller fragments that have been labeled, also, Exhibit 857. This picture or some of the fragments labeled 857, these are the smaller fragments contained in the same box.
Mr. SPECTER. Are all of the fragments on 859 contained within 857?
Dr. OLIVIER. They are supposed to be, photographed and placed in the box. If they dropped out they are supposed to be all there.
.......
Mr. SPECTER. For that purpose I hand you Commission Exhibit 860 and ask you if that is designated in any way to identify it.
Mr. DULLES. This is the test we are talking about now, is it?
Mr. SPECTER. Yes, sir; where the bullet fragmented into pieces in 857.
.....
Dr. OLIVIER. This photograph is the skull that was shot with the bullet, the fragments which are marked 857.

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0440a.htm







JFK Assassination Forum

Re: LNers Can't Explain the Two Back-of-Head Bullet Fragments
« Reply #256 on: July 24, 2025, 05:56:52 AM »


Offline Michael T. Griffith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1055
    • JFK Assassination Website
Re: LNers Can't Explain the Two Back-of-Head Bullet Fragments
« Reply #257 on: July 24, 2025, 01:17:47 PM »
Mr. SPECTER. I now hand you a photograph marked Commission Exhibit 859 and ask you what that depicts?
Dr. OLIVIER. These are the smaller fragments that have been labeled, also, Exhibit 857. This picture or some of the fragments labeled 857, these are the smaller fragments contained in the same box.
Mr. SPECTER. Are all of the fragments on 859 contained within 857?
Dr. OLIVIER. They are supposed to be, photographed and placed in the box. If they dropped out they are supposed to be all there.
.......
Mr. SPECTER. For that purpose I hand you Commission Exhibit 860 and ask you if that is designated in any way to identify it.
Mr. DULLES. This is the test we are talking about now, is it?
Mr. SPECTER. Yes, sir; where the bullet fragmented into pieces in 857.
.....
Dr. OLIVIER. This photograph is the skull that was shot with the bullet, the fragments which are marked 857.

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0440a.htm


LOL!!! Holy cow!!! Now compare that test-skull x-ray with the JFK skull x-rays!!! The test-skull x-ray has fragments scattered from a point just above the EOP to the right orbit. The JFK skull x-rays show no fragments anywhere near the EOP but shows fragments at least 2 inches higher in the top part of the skull, i.e., the cloud of fragments high in the right-frontal region and trailing to/from and upward to/from a sparse trail that courses toward the upper back part of the head and ending at a point at least 4 inches above the EOP! Furthermore, there is no cluster of dozens of fragments in the test-skull x-rays, but there is an obvious one in the JFK skull x-rays.

Yes, as I've said repeatedly, the fragmentation pattern seen in the test-skull x-rays bears no resemblance to the pattern seen in the JFK skull x-rays.

And I notice you again ignored Olivier's comment that CEs 857 and 859 were "supposed" to contain the same number of fragments. But, clearly they do not. And this is where Specter took Olivier "off the record." Gee, I wonder why, hey?

I also notice that you only showed CE 859 and ignored CE 857. Is that because CE 859 contains more fragments than CE 857, even though they're supposed to contain the same fragments? You won't address the indications that CEs 857 and 859 contain fragments from more than just one bullet.

I also notice that you only used one of the test-skull x-rays. Why was that? Why didn't you also use the other one? I think we both know why. I think you know better than the falsehoods you are peddling.






[/b]
« Last Edit: July 24, 2025, 02:56:43 PM by Michael T. Griffith »

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1950
Re: LNers Can't Explain the Two Back-of-Head Bullet Fragments
« Reply #258 on: July 25, 2025, 12:07:29 AM »
LOL!!! Holy cow!!! Now compare that test-skull x-ray with the JFK skull x-rays!!! The test-skull x-ray has fragments scattered from a point just above the EOP to the right orbit. The JFK skull x-rays show no fragments anywhere near the EOP but shows fragments at least 2 inches higher in the top part of the skull, i.e., the cloud of fragments high in the right-frontal region and trailing to/from and upward to/from a sparse trail that courses toward the upper back part of the head and ending at a point at least 4 inches above the EOP! Furthermore, there is no cluster of dozens of fragments in the test-skull x-rays, but there is an obvious one in the JFK skull x-rays.

Yes, as I've said repeatedly, the fragmentation pattern seen in the test-skull x-rays bears no resemblance to the pattern seen in the JFK skull x-rays.

And I notice you again ignored Olivier's comment that CEs 857 and 859 were "supposed" to contain the same number of fragments. But, clearly they do not. And this is where Specter took Olivier "off the record." Gee, I wonder why, hey?

I also notice that you only showed CE 859 and ignored CE 857. Is that because CE 859 contains more fragments than CE 857, even though they're supposed to contain the same fragments? You won't address the indications that CEs 857 and 859 contain fragments from more than just one bullet.

I also notice that you only used one of the test-skull x-rays. Why was that? Why didn't you also use the other one? I think we both know why. I think you know better than the falsehoods you are peddling.

[/b]

I acknowledged that Olivier said that CE-857 and CE-859 contained the same fragments. As I just showed you above, Olivier stated that the fragments in CE-859 were all from one bullet. That disproves your own claim that they were not.

The tests done at Edgewood Arsenal for the WC prove that FMJ bullets do shatter into dozens of fragments when they penetrate human skulls.

« Last Edit: July 25, 2025, 12:35:09 AM by Tim Nickerson »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: LNers Can't Explain the Two Back-of-Head Bullet Fragments
« Reply #258 on: July 25, 2025, 12:07:29 AM »


Online Marjan Rynkiewicz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 985
Re: LNers Can't Explain the Two Back-of-Head Bullet Fragments
« Reply #259 on: July 25, 2025, 03:31:14 AM »
In 1964 Olivier found no Carcano fragmentation inside 10 test human skulls filled with jelly.
In just one test the Carcano broke into 3 large pieces, after passing throo the skull.
All 10 tests were made 4" lower than the actual trajectory in 1963.
Some of the 10 tests exited via thick eye or nose bone.
Cyril Wecht agreed that a Carcano will not explode or disintegrate into dozens of pieces but can break into 2 or 3 pieces, and that the 1963 bullet behaved like a soft point or hollow point.
It was an accident, Hickey was just doing his job.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1950
Re: LNers Can't Explain the Two Back-of-Head Bullet Fragments
« Reply #260 on: July 25, 2025, 03:33:24 AM »
Gunn's letter makes it clear that DiMaio did not comment on the cause of the wounds but only on the quality and nature of the autopsy photos, which is perhaps why he was not listed in the index of ARRB interviews. It is odd that he was not listed in the next of interviews. Even though he didn't offer forensic observations about the wounds, he was interviewed and should have been listed.

What expertise of DiMaio's was he called upon to employ when asked to view the autopsy photos and X-Rays? He was a forensic pathologist, specializing in gunshot wounds. He was asked to inspect the images for the information contained within them.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: LNers Can't Explain the Two Back-of-Head Bullet Fragments
« Reply #260 on: July 25, 2025, 03:33:24 AM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1950
Re: LNers Can't Explain the Two Back-of-Head Bullet Fragments
« Reply #261 on: July 25, 2025, 03:39:28 AM »
In 1964 Olivier found no Carcano fragmentation inside 10 test human skulls filled with jelly.
In just one test the Carcano broke into 3 large pieces, after passing throo the skull.

That is FALSE.

Quote
All 10 tests were made 4" lower than the actual trajectory in 1963.

That is FALSE.

Quote
Some of the 10 tests exited via thick eye or nose bone.
Cyril Wecht agreed that a Carcano will not explode or disintegrate into dozens of pieces but can break into 2 or 3 pieces, and that the 1963 bullet behaved like a soft point or hollow point.
It was an accident, Hickey was just doing his job.

Wecht was wrong. So was Donahue.

Online Marjan Rynkiewicz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 985
Re: LNers Can't Explain the Two Back-of-Head Bullet Fragments
« Reply #262 on: July 25, 2025, 06:17:47 AM »
That is FALSE.

That is FALSE.

Wecht was wrong. So was Donahue.
Allso, Olivier's ten tests were at Z313 sniper range, where the 2,200 fps was much reduced.
Hickey's 3,200 fps auto burst was at say 21 ft from muzzle to jfk.
Allso, only one of Olivier's heads were blasted offa the stand. All 10 would have blasted off if Olivier had used a hollow point AR15.
« Last Edit: July 25, 2025, 06:19:06 AM by Marjan Rynkiewicz »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: LNers Can't Explain the Two Back-of-Head Bullet Fragments
« Reply #262 on: July 25, 2025, 06:17:47 AM »