Deconstructing Bugliosi's "53 pieces of evidence"

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Deconstructing Bugliosi's "53 pieces of evidence"  (Read 31317 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Deconstructing Bugliosi's "53 pieces of evidence"
« Reply #35 on: December 16, 2022, 05:50:03 PM »
Why do you continue to insist in showing off just how big of a fool you are. And what do you think to achieve by completely misrepresenting what was actually said?

“Richard” is either an utterly dishonest propagandist or an utter failure at comprehending the written word. My money is on utterly dishonest propagandist.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Deconstructing Bugliosi's "53 pieces of evidence"
« Reply #36 on: December 16, 2022, 06:00:00 PM »
Brennan is standing below on the street, hears gun shots, does the logical thing and looks for the source of the noise and sees Oswald with his rifle.

Except he didn't, because in the Z-film he can be seen watching the motorcade at the time the shots rang out and the shooter was just about completely hidden behind the wall next to the SN window.

This doesn't seem like a great mystery.

What is a complete mystery is how a reasonable person can take anything Brennan said seriously.

What Brennan swore to in his affidavit on 1/22/63 is the truth as he remembered seeing the events at the time of the murder.....  He was not lying...... but he may have been confused about some aspects.    It was only after seeing Lee Oswald murdered ( who he knew was innocent of shooting JFK) that  he saw the light and decided to support the official tale.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Deconstructing Bugliosi's "53 pieces of evidence"
« Reply #37 on: December 16, 2022, 06:05:59 PM »
“Richard” is either an utterly dishonest propagandist or an utter failure at comprehending the written word. My money is on utterly dishonest propagandist.

i] utterly dishonest propagandist.[/i]

Mr "Smith" is far more than an ....i] utterly dishonest propagandist.[/i]

At this late date and all of the information that has surfaced over the years .... I doubt that any rational person could possibly believe the stuff that "Smith" regurgitates

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Deconstructing Bugliosi's "53 pieces of evidence"
« Reply #38 on: December 16, 2022, 08:16:42 PM »

There; Now others can judge for themselves just where they think Brennan
appears to be looking.

Bill Chapman
Dead Oswald Tour
27,598 Views To Date

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Deconstructing Bugliosi's "53 pieces of evidence"
« Reply #39 on: December 16, 2022, 08:43:03 PM »
Oswald took a knee. Only Tippit had to worry about a gun in the face.
« Last Edit: December 18, 2022, 04:43:24 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Michael T. Griffith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1529
    • JFK Assassination Website
Re: Deconstructing Bugliosi's "53 pieces of evidence"
« Reply #40 on: December 17, 2022, 05:33:08 PM »
What Brennan swore to in his affidavit on 1/22/63 is the truth as he remembered seeing the events at the time of the murder.....  He was not lying...... but he may have been confused about some aspects.    It was only after seeing Lee Oswald murdered ( who he knew was innocent of shooting JFK) that  he saw the light and decided to support the official tale.

That's an accurate, fair analysis. Brennan was hounded by federal agents to testify that the man he saw was Oswald. Brennan failed to positively ID Oswald even in the grossly rigged police lineup that he was shown, but, after being hounded by federal agents, Brennan later told the WC that the man he saw was Oswald.

Moreover, Brennan's description of the gunman's clothing does not match the clothes Oswald was wearing but does match the description given by four other witnesses who reported seeing a man in the window. Brennan and the other witnesses described the man's shirt as a regular "light-colored" shirt. However, Oswald did not wear a light-colored shirt to work that day. He wore a brown, rust-colored shirt that day, and he was seen in that shirt in the second-floor lunchroom less than ninety seconds after the shots were fired. I should add that two witnesses who saw the sixth-floor gunman said his hair was light-colored or light-brown, whereas Oswald's hair was solid brown and not light-colored at all.

Plus, new research regarding the witnesses who were near and/or on the TSBD stairs right after the shooting proves that Oswald did not go down those stairs to get to the second-floor lunchroom, as is detailed in the new documentary JFK Revisited.
« Last Edit: December 17, 2022, 05:35:30 PM by Michael T. Griffith »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Deconstructing Bugliosi's "53 pieces of evidence"
« Reply #41 on: December 17, 2022, 08:49:31 PM »
That's an accurate, fair analysis. Brennan was hounded by federal agents to testify that the man he saw was Oswald. Brennan failed to positively ID Oswald even in the grossly rigged police lineup that he was shown, but, after being hounded by federal agents, Brennan later told the WC that the man he saw was Oswald.

Moreover, Brennan's description of the gunman's clothing does not match the clothes Oswald was wearing but does match the description given by four other witnesses who reported seeing a man in the window. Brennan and the other witnesses described the man's shirt as a regular "light-colored" shirt. However, Oswald did not wear a light-colored shirt to work that day. He wore a brown, rust-colored shirt that day, and he was seen in that shirt in the second-floor lunchroom less than ninety seconds after the shots were fired. I should add that two witnesses who saw the sixth-floor gunman said his hair was light-colored or light-brown, whereas Oswald's hair was solid brown and not light-colored at all.

Plus, new research regarding the witnesses who were near and/or on the TSBD stairs right after the shooting proves that Oswald did not go down those stairs to get to the second-floor lunchroom, as is detailed in the new documentary JFK Revisited.

The whole gang was there, covering for each other: Oswald of course... and O.H. Lee, Hidell, and my favourite, Dirty Harvey (I made that one up. I'm very clever.)

Meanwhile:


Bill Chapman/Dead Oswald Tour
Above: Gang of Four

Dirty Harry: "Smith, Wesson... and me"
--------------------------------------------
Dirty Harvey: Smith, Wesson... and Lee
« Last Edit: December 19, 2022, 03:03:17 PM by Bill Chapman »