Debunking the JFK Conspiracists: New Book

[Charles Collins]

There are few things more insipid and uninspiring than a true believer who has found a particular religion and declares "I once was blind, but now I see!"

I disagree with your opinion. But the comments from the peanut gallery definitely are insipid. The people who are relegated to the peanut gallery don’t usually have any conspiracy theories that they have the balls to defend. And they typically have insignificant but critical remarks whenever the authorities are mentioned.

[John Iacoletti]

The idea that it takes “balls” to make up a story that cannot be substantiated (like the official narrative) is patently absurd. It takes an overactive imagination.

[Charles Collins]

The idea that it takes “balls” to make up a story that cannot be substantiated (like the official narrative) is patently absurd. It takes an overactive imagination.

Who said anything about “making up” a story? The comment says “defend” a theory.

What’s truly absurd is to have a plethora of theories (59-years worth) to select from, and to pretend that none of them are valid. It appears that the people in the peanut gallery have decided that a theory of how the assassination happened is optional. That’s why they belong in the peanut gallery.

[John Iacoletti]

A “theory” with no basis is no different from a made-up story. It’s not some kind of virtue to be able to make up stories. People with no valid arguments resort to juvenile nicknames and hope that they somehow will make up the difference.

[Mike Orr]

How can you claim that CE 399 was a magic bullet since that bullet was still in Connallys left thigh ? Uh-oh !!!!!

[Charles Collins]

A “theory” with no basis is no different from a made-up story. It’s not some kind of virtue to be able to make up stories. People with no valid arguments resort to juvenile nicknames and hope that they somehow will make up the difference.

People in the peanut gallery have nothing significant to contribute. So they resort to showing their displeasure at everything.

[John Iacoletti]

Condescending and supercilious put downs are what some people consider “significant”. But it’s all they‘ve got. They think people should show “pleasure” at their brilliant speculations.