X Marks The Spot

[Martin Weidmann]

How arrogant and delusional does one have to be to declare that he understands another person's conclusions better than that person himself?

What's really funny is that he keeps on displaying time after time that he doesn't understand a word of what I have been telling him.

[Richard Smith]

I never suggested that your conclusion that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs" was true because it is a conclusion.  To the complete contrary, your conclusion is false. 

Confused again? I never said that you made such a suggestion. But since you claim my conclusion is false, prove it! 

Oh wait, you can only say it but can't present a shred of evidence to back it up, which makes your opinion/conclusion a pretty insignicifant figment of your imagination.

The point - which you still can't grasp - is that having concluded that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs" means that you must also have concluded that Oswald wasn't the assassin.

Reading problems again? Didn't I just agree (yet again) with this? But talk about not grasping something. Try this for size; that logical conclusion is only correct in the context of the official narrative.

You went down a rabbit hole about whether you reached a conclusion or provided an opinion on the topic of Oswald coming down the stairs to deflect from admitting that you concluded that Oswald wasn't the assassin.

Nope. The one going down that rabbit hole was you. I was laughing all the time about the idiotic statements you came up with.

The point being that to conclude that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs" as you have done means by implication that you must have concluded that Oswald could not be the assassin.  That is the only implication that can be drawn.

Try to learn something for once. I'll say it again; only in the context of the official narritive.

The issue is understanding your position (i.e. "Oswald didn't come down the stairs" means that you have concluded he wasn't the assassin).  Yet, after a hundred or more attempts to confirm that you accept the only implication of your conclusion that Oswald didn't come down the stairs which is that Oswald wasn't the assassin, you still haven't done it.

That confirms it once and for all; you do have a reading comprehension problem.

So many words to no purpose.  None of this gibberish is a complete thought or response to any point raised. 

[Martin Weidmann]

So many words to no purpose.  None of this gibberish is a complete thought or response to any point raised.

Translation; I still have difficulty understanding and I haven't got a clue what to say.

But let me try to help you. Just tell me what part of "only in the context of the official narritive" do you have trouble understanding?

[John Iacoletti]

In “Richard”-land, conclusions are final, assumptions are facts, and made-up stories are evidence. Stay in school, kids. Don’t end up like “Richard”.

[Richard Smith]

Translation; I still have difficulty understanding and I haven't got a clue what to say.

But let me try to help you. Just tell me what part of "only in the context of the official narritive" do you have trouble understanding?

Try to communicate via complete thoughts instead of fragments and gibberish.  If you have something to discuss, just say it instead of asking others to read your mind.  You concluded that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs."  If he "didn't come down the stairs", then he couldn't have been on the 6th floor. at 12:30, and thus not the assassin.   Are you suggesting now that Oswald assassinated JFK from some other place in the building?   I know that there is good reason for you to be frightening to take any position but give it a try for once instead of being a coward.  Have the courage of your contrarian convictions for once. 

[Martin Weidmann]

Try to communicate via complete thoughts instead of fragments and gibberish.  If you have something to discuss, just say it instead of asking others to read your mind.  You concluded that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs."  If he "didn't come down the stairs", then he couldn't have been on the 6th floor. at 12:30, and thus not the assassin.   Are you suggesting now that Oswald assassinated JFK from some other place in the building?   I know that there is good reason for you to be frightening to take any position but give it a try for once instead of being a coward.  Have the courage of your contrarian convictions for once.

And still he is incapable of logical thought and comprehension.

Try to communicate via complete thoughts instead of fragments and gibberish.

I have been clear as day. It is not my problem that you don't understand even simple concepts.

If you have something to discuss, just say it

"Something to discuss" says the guy who never discusses anything. Not even his own bogus claims.

instead of asking others to read your mind.

I never asked that..... again, it's not my problem when you are clueless.

If he "didn't come down the stairs", then he couldn't have been on the 6th floor. at 12:30, and thus not the assassin. 

This was a logical conclusion and never really an issue, except somehow in your mind.

Are you suggesting now that Oswald assassinated JFK from some other place in the building?

No. Whatever gave you that idea?

I know that there is good reason for you to be frightening to take any position but give it a try for once instead of being a coward.

Hilarious.

[Richard Smith]

And still he is incapable of logical thought and comprehension.

Try to communicate via complete thoughts instead of fragments and gibberish.

I have been clear as day. It is not my problem that you don't understand even simple concepts.

If you have something to discuss, just say it

"Something to discuss" says the guy who never discusses anything. Not even his own bogus claims.

instead of asking others to read your mind.

I never asked that..... again, it's not my problem when you are clueless.

If he "didn't come down the stairs", then he couldn't have been on the 6th floor. at 12:30, and thus not the assassin. 

This was a logical conclusion and never really an issue, except somehow in your mind.

Are you suggesting now that Oswald assassinated JFK from some other place in the building?

No. Whatever gave you that idea?

I know that there is good reason for you to be frightening to take any position but give it a try for once instead of being a coward.

Hilarious.

Again, more fragments and gibberish.  Why not have the courage to state YOUR own position?  If Oswald "didn't come down the stairs" as you concluded, then he wasn't the assassin.  Right?  Is that your position or not?  If not, then explain to us how Oswald might still be the assassin if he "didn't come down the stairs."