Re: Motorcycle Policeman Hargis said Limo stopped !

[Mitch Todd]

Then I suppose you were the one who corrected your post before I quoted you. I don't recall because whoever received a copy of the Z-film, and damaged it, is irrelevant.

Your powers of supposition have failed you. Maybe you need further study at the suppository to improve your skills? I never used "Newsweek" in the first place. Would be foolish to scrub it, anyway, since most current content management systems journal changes instead of overwriting.

But what about the rest of my post? Or is that all you got as a rebut?

My reply was reply #186 yesterday at 06:33:34 PM. This must not be your week.

[Matt Grantham]

Matt, they match up.  Perfectly. If you think otherwise, more power to you.

 I thought the speed of the limo relative to the background reflect a constant speed I thought that was the whole point

[John Iacoletti]

FWIW - I've used this video ad nauseum to prove that the Z film is original and not doctored in any way. But of course the crazies out there always disagree with that assessment.

You're using the film itself to demonstrate the authenticity of the film?  How does that work?

[Michael Walton]

You're using the film itself to demonstrate the authenticity of the film?  How does that work?

Two people with cameras from opposite sides of the street shooting the same sequence. If one looks "funny" then one or the other has been faked some how.  They don't which means they're authentic.

PS - and why would the guy in NZ make a synched tape like that?  To prove they both match.

PPS - I'm not into animated icons.  One of the biggest all-time jerks I've ever come across on JFK forums, Dave Josephs, uses them like the 50-year-old child that he is.

[John Iacoletti]

Two people with cameras from opposite sides of the street shooting the same sequence. If one looks "funny" then one or the other has been faked some how.  They don't which means they're authentic.

What if they all look funny?  Weren't they shot at different frame rates?

[Matt Grantham]

Two people with cameras from opposite sides of the street shooting the same sequence. If one looks "funny" then one or the other has been faked some how.  They don't which means they're authentic.

PS - and why would the guy in NZ make a synched tape like that?  To prove they both match.

PPS - I'm not into animated icons.  One of the biggest all-time jerks I've ever come across on JFK forums, Dave Josephs, uses them like the 50-year-old child that he is.

If they are willing to alter one why would they not be willing to alter another?

[Mike Orr]

      The original Orville Nix film was studied in 1978 by the HSCA , but was lost when they returned it to UPI in 1979. Copies of the film were returned to the Nix family, but the whereabouts of the original film remains a mystery. If found ,the film could possibly reveal important details , like the presence of a shooter on the grassy knoll. Examination of the film shows the image of what seems to be a shooter on the top of a car. Gayle Nix Jackson, Orville's granddaughter , is on the hunt for the original film since 1988. Gayle wrote a book titled , Orville Nix: The Missing Kennedy Assassination Film . In the search of the film, she has talked to many people, among them Maurice Schonfeld , co-founder of CNN. In 1963 , Schonfeld was a
UPI executive who agreed to pay Orville Nix $5,000 for his film . In 1978, HSCA only studied 8 frames of the film. Two experts of the HSCA photo panel, Drs. Clyde Snow and Paul Roetling, told Gayle Nix that "they had never studied the film, only frames...Eight frames were shown to them and those were the 8 frames studied". The HSCA studied the film with the image of what seems to be that of a shooter leaning on the top of a car but they concluded that the image is simply a combination of lights and shadows. Gayle Nix Jackson is on this forum. Personally I don't think it was just coincidental that the original Nix film was not returned to the Nix family. I feel like there were parts of the Nix film that showed something that certain people did not want us to see .

                       ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1189005