JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Re: Motorcycle Policeman Hargis said Limo stopped !
Matt Grantham:
--- Quote from: Mitch Todd on May 25, 2018, 07:13:33 AM ---You're trying to shift the burden. That load falls upon those who claim the the film is altered and Brugioni's statement is the proof. Why should we take so literally something a 90 year old man remembered about a film he'd seen one day 50 years before? And speaking of old men, what about Abe Zapruder? He was shown a copy of the extant film during the Shaw trial, and said that it was a proper copy of the film he took. How do you square what Zap said six years after the fact with what you seem to want to believe Brugioni said 50 years after?
--- End quote ---
Don't ignore Rather Your comparison is apples and oranges A person who gets to watch the film frame by frame has an extraordinary advantage over someone seeing it only in real time, and one time only Not to mention Zapruder does say the early frames are missing
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Mitch Todd on May 25, 2018, 07:13:33 AM ---You're trying to shift the burden. That load falls upon those who claim the the film is altered and Brugioni's statement is the proof. Why should we take so literally something a 90 year old man remembered about a film he'd seen one day 50 years before? And speaking of old men, what about Abe Zapruder? He was shown a copy of the extant film during the Shaw trial, and said that it was a proper copy of the film he took. How do you square what Zap said six years after the fact with what you seem to want to believe Brugioni said 50 years after?
--- End quote ---
Brugioni was an Image Expert and Examined the Z Film on 11/23/63 for several hours employing the finest equipment available at that time. Zapruder Eyeballed a fractured flicker from the witness stand amidst a packed courthouse reminiscent of a scene out of "To Kill A Mockingbird". On top of that, Zapruder had a contract with Time/Life for $150,000 for the Z Film being displayed before him. If Zapruder were to discredit that film in Any manner, to Any degree, he would have been putting His $150,000 in severe jeopardy.
Mitch Todd:
--- Quote from: Matt Grantham on May 25, 2018, 07:21:10 AM --- Don't ignore Rather Your comparison is apples and oranges A person who gets to watch the film frame by frame has an extraordinary advantage over someone seeing it only in real time, and one time only Not to mention Zapruder does say the early frames are missing
--- End quote ---
Yeah, Rather. The guy who saw the film then got it spectacularly wrong 20 minutes later. Zapruder, by the way, saw the actual event, plus seeing the film in 1963. If anyone would have noted significant discrepancies, it would be he.
Now, as to Zapruder thinking there were frames missing, is that something he said, or something someone said he said?
Matt Grantham:
--- Quote from: Mitch Todd on May 29, 2018, 05:34:11 AM ---
Now, as to Zapruder thinking there were frames missing, is that something he said, or something someone said he said?
--- End quote ---
Yes when someone says something quote worthy you generally need someone to hear it
Mitch Todd:
--- Quote from: Matt Grantham on May 29, 2018, 06:01:30 AM --- Yes when someone says something quote worthy you generally need someone to hear it
--- End quote ---
...Yet, people seem to be unable to quote it. Or is this one of those coy acts where the underlying meaning is "I don't really know?"
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version