Blonde

[Martin Weidmann]

If Oswald "didn't come down the stairs" from the 6th floor after the assassination as you have concluded, how could he be in the 2nd floor lunchroom for the encounter with Baker and still have been the assassin?

And there we have it; the conclusive proof that what I am saying is going way over your head.

[Richard Smith]

And there we have it; the conclusive proof that what I am saying is going way over your head.

Why not just answer the simple question?  It is not a trick.  Again, if you have concluded that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs" after the assassination, how could he still have been the assassin?  Do you think there was another way that Oswald could have gotten from the 6th floor to the 2nd floor without being seen?  If not, that rules him out as the assassin.  So explain it to us.  Avoid the temptation to deflect to personal commentary or other issues to avoid answering as you have done for weeks. 

[Martin Weidmann]

Why not just answer the simple question?  It is not a trick.  Again, if you have concluded that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs" after the assassination, how could he still have been the assassin?  Do you think there was another way that Oswald could have gotten from the 6th floor to the 2nd floor without being seen?  If not, that rules him out as the assassin.  So explain it to us.  Avoid the temptation to deflect to personal commentary or other issues to avoid answering as you have done for weeks.

Why not just answer the simple question?

Says the guy who refuses to answer any questions ... 

I've been answering your ignorant questions for weeks now, when at the same time you have refused or were unable to answer my questions.

Where did I say that Oswald could still have been the assassin if he didn't come down the stairs? You are still not getting any of this, aren't you?

Here's a clue;

Try to understand the stupidity of this remark;

Why not tell "them" your evidence that leads you to conclude that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs"?  If that is the case, then you have proven Oswald is innocent,

and you might figure it out.

[Richard Smith]

Why not just answer the simple question?

Says the guy who refuses to answer any questions ... 

I've been answering your ignorant questions for weeks now, when at the same time you have refused or were unable to answer my questions.

Where did I say that Oswald could still have been the assassin if he didn't come down the stairs? You are still not getting any of this, aren't you?

Here's a clue;

Try to understand the stupidity of this remark;

and you might figure it out.

What are you babbling about?  This is real simple.  I've tried to dumb this down to the point that a child could answer.   How could Oswald be the assassin if he "didn't come down the stairs" after the assassination as you conclude?  I didn't suggest that you have said that Oswald could still have been the assassin.  That was my question.  If Oswald "didn't come the stairs" then you must believe he is innocent of this crime and he was framed as part of a conspiracy.  Is that your position or not?

[Martin Weidmann]

What are you babbling about?  This is real simple.  I've tried to dumb this down to the point that a child could answer.   How could Oswald be the assassin if he "didn't come down the stairs" after the assassination as you conclude?  I didn't suggest that you have said that Oswald could still have been the assassin.  That was my question. If Oswald "didn't come the stairs" then you must believe he is innocent of this crime and he was framed as part of a conspiracy.  Is that your position or not?

What are you babbling about?

Still clueless, I see.... You might want to tone down the arrogance when you display so much ignorance.

This is real simple.

Yes it is, so why are you not getting any of it?

I've tried to dumb this down to the point that a child could answer. How could Oswald be the assassin if he "didn't come down the stairs" after the assassination as you conclude?  I didn't suggest that you have said that Oswald could still have been the assassin.  That was my question.

And it's a pretty dumb question, which I have already answered a number of times in a way a child would understand it.

If Oswald "didn't come the stairs" then you must believe he is innocent of this crime and he was framed as part of a conspiracy.

More ignorance on display. Why must I believe that?

I have to say that it is great fun to watch you guess and making a complete fool of yourself time after time. It is very telling about just how limited you capacity to examine and understand obvious facts really is.

[John Iacoletti]

If Oswald "didn't come the stairs" then you must believe he is innocent of this crime and he was framed as part of a conspiracy.

Why must he? Because you are Strawman “Smith”?

[John Iacoletti]

Why not just answer the simple question?  It is not a trick. 

But it’s a diversion. Can you demonstrate with evidence that Oswald was on the sixth floor with a rifle and then came down the staircase to the second floor within 75 seconds without being seen or heard by the 12 people along the way, or can you not?

Why not just answer the simple question?