Blonde

[Martin Weidmann]

My opinion of JFK has nothing do with why I believe Oswald was the assassin.  It's the evidence that confirms that.  Just as the evidence confirms there was a conspiracy to kill President Lincoln.  If I were influenced by anti-liberal bias, then I would be onboard with conspiracy nuts who think LBJ was behind the assassination.  LBJ was the most liberal president in modern history.   LBJ, however, had absolutely nothing to do with the assassination.

My opinion of JFK has nothing do with why I believe Oswald was the assassin.  It's the evidence that confirms that.

And what evidence would that be exactly?

Do you have evidence that can show that;

- the MC rifle found at the TSBD was fired?
- the MC rifle was in Oswald's possession on 11/21/63?
- Oswald brought the MC rifle into the TSBD?
- Oswald was on the 6th floor when the shots were fired?
- Oswald was in fact the shooter?
- Oswald managed to go down the stairs unnoticed within 75 seconds after the last shot?

I don't believe you have any credible evidence for any of this, so what "evidence" are you constantly talking about?

[Richard Smith]

My opinion of JFK has nothing do with why I believe Oswald was the assassin.  It's the evidence that confirms that.

And what evidence would that be exactly?

Do you have evidence that can show that;

- the MC rifle found at the TSBD was fired?
- the MC rifle was in Oswald's possession on 11/21/63?
- Oswald brought the MC rifle into the TSBD?
- Oswald was on the 6th floor when the shots were fired?
- Oswald was in fact the shooter?
- Oswald managed to go down the stairs unnoticed within 75 seconds after the last shot?

I don't believe you have any credible evidence for any of this, so what "evidence" are you constantly talking about?

Off topic and asked and answered.  See WC report.  See HSCA Report.  If you have evidence that raises doubt of Oswald's guilt such as a concluding that "he didn't come down the stairs", please provide that to the DPD or NY Times.  Don't waste your time here.  Get back to us with their response. 

[Martin Weidmann]

Off topic and asked and answered.  See WC report.  See HSCA Report.  If you have evidence that raises doubt of Oswald's guilt such as a concluding that "he didn't come down the stairs", please provide that to the DPD or NY Times.  Don't waste your time here.  Get back to us with their response.

Shall I tell them that a guy calling himself Richard Smith is telling people that Oswald killed Kennedy without being able to support any of his claims with actual evidence?   

[Richard Smith]

Shall I tell them that a guy calling himself Richard Smith is telling people that Oswald killed Kennedy without being able to support any of his claims with actual evidence?   

I don't believe they are as obsessed with me as you are.  Why not tell "them" your evidence that leads you to conclude that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs"?  If that is the case, then you have proven Oswald is innocent, and you are a conspiracy theorist as it is the only possible implication to be drawn from YOUR conclusion.  Get back to us with their response.  Sounds like a Pulitzer Prize winning story to exonerate Oswald.  That is if they believe it and accept your "evidence."  You don't do that yourself, but maybe they will have more confidence in your "evidence" than you do.

[Richard Smith]

Apparently, the Loons expect LN evidence in the form of Hollywood-quality motion-picture film, indisputable infallible witnesses (priests, rabbis? people with a bionic recording device?) or their own direct verification through time-travel.

Meanwhile CTs get to pull things out of their az-se like the Shroud Letter and the ditzy Vicki Adams (I saw Jack Ruby; time me in my 3" heels, I dare you). Sandra Styles says they first went to the passenger elevator and she's "mistaken".

All too true.  The most amazing thing about an otherwise uninteresting Martin is that he reached a conclusion that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs" - the only way to have come down from the 6th floor after the assassination - but he refuses to accept the only possible implication of his OWN conclusion.  That Oswald couldn't have been the 6th floor assassin since those stairs are the only way to have reached the 2nd floor lunchroom in the known timeframe.  A mind-bending psychological insight into the contrarian mind.  He takes issue even with his own conclusions.  An exercise in self-loathing. 

[Charles Collins]

I think this thread is quite revealing and actually confirms everything I've always said. That is, people who think the government got it right on Kennedy's murder actually, deep down, don't like Kennedy, the family or whatever. So there's a heavy dose of bias involved.

It reminds me of the investigator who hated women in general, and whores specifically. Suppose a whore is found dead in an alley and this investigator has to find out who killed her. He'll do the least amount of work and secretly write it off as, "Eh, she deserved it."

The same here with Richard and many others who think the Feds got it right. They really don't like Kennedy and, therefore, Oswald did it alone and deep down, Kennedy "deserved it." I sure wouldn't want those kind of people investigating my loved one's murder.

Good grief man, this is one of the stupidest things I have seen written on this forum. 

[Martin Weidmann]

I don't believe they are as obsessed with me as you are.  Why not tell "them" your evidence that leads you to conclude that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs"?  If that is the case, then you have proven Oswald is innocent, and you are a conspiracy theorist as it is the only possible implication to be drawn from YOUR conclusion.  Get back to us with their response.  Sounds like a Pulitzer Prize winning story to exonerate Oswald.  That is if they believe it and accept your "evidence."  You don't do that yourself, but maybe they will have more confidence in your "evidence" than you do.

All this BS and no trace of even a shred of evidence for his claims. 

then you have proven Oswald is innocent

This is exactly the reason why I won't let you get away with your arrogant crap. I don't need to prove anybody innocent. When you claim that Oswald was on the 6th floor when the shots were fired and that he managed to get down the stairs unnoticed within 75 seconds after the last shot, it's you who needs to prove it, in order to prove his guilt.