The Remains of Bonnie Ray

[Walt Cakebread]

What point are you trying to make?  That a photograph is necessary to prove that there was a shooter in the window?  That is absurd.   We all know that there are no photos of the rifle pointing out the window.  To ask for such a photo knowing it does not exist while ignoring the actual evidence of a shooter is absurd.   Walt suggested that was the ONLY way to prove this happened while rejecting multiple witnesses who placed a shooter in the window and the evidence such as fired bullet casings found by that window.   It is laughable to suggest that they only way to prove that there was a shooter in that window is to have a photograph of the event.  That is the old time machine claim.  Most criminals are not photographed in the act.  They are nevertheless convicted on the evidence.  Multiple witnesses (as I cited) saw the shooter or rifle in the window at the moment of the assassination.  Jackson saw the rifle and took a picture of the window because he had seen the rifle from that window.  There is zero doubt of the presence of someone in that window at the moment of the assassination.

Psssst...Mr" Smith".... Even the The Dallas Chief of police , no less, told you that they ( The investigators) had never been able to place Lee Oswald behind that window with the rifle in his hands.....

Do you understand that?...Mr "Smith"

[Alan Ford]

Psssst...Mr" Smith".... Even the The Dallas Chief of police , no less, told you that they ( The investigators) had never been able to place Lee Oswald behind that window with the rifle in his hands.....

The actual quote is:

"No one has ever been able to put him in the Texas School Book Depository with a rifle in his hand."

 

[Walt Cakebread]

The actual quote is:

"No one has ever been able to put him in the Texas School Book Depository with a rifle in his hand."

 

Thanks Alan....  I know that Curry basically said that they couldn't PROVE that Lee Oswald was an assassin.

And of course that would mean that Lee probably would have never been convicted in a fair trial....

[John Iacoletti]

Jackson saw the rifle and took a picture of the window because he had seen the rifle from that window. 

Still waiting for “Richard” to produce this elusive Jackson photo, because this would be news to Jackson as well.

And “Richard” wonders why nobody takes him seriously…

There is zero doubt of the presence of someone in that window at the moment of the assassination.

There is nothing about anything that has “zero doubt” — even if there was a photo of it.

[Richard Smith]

LOL.  Classic contrarian logic.  Jackson directed Dillard to the window from which he saw the rifle and Dillard took the photo.  Jackson saw the rifle and directed Dillard to the window to take the photograph.  Got it.  But contrarians are obsessed on whether it was technically Jackson's photo.  HA HA HA.  The point being that Jackson saw the rifle as corroborated by the photo.  Why else would Jackson direct attention to that particular window in the moments after the assassination?  Unreal how the contrarians deflect from the obvious point to minutia.  Now where is the long-awaited explanation for why anyone would move the boxes in the moments after the assassination while law enforcement was closing in on the building?  Waiting, waiting. 

[Walt Cakebread]

LOL.  Classic contrarian logic.  Jackson directed Dillard to the window from which he saw the rifle and Dillard took the photo.  Jackson saw the rifle and directed Dillard to the window to take the photograph.  Got it.  But contrarians are obsessed on whether it was technically Jackson's photo.  HA HA HA.  The point being that Jackson saw the rifle as corroborated by the photo.  Why else would Jackson direct attention to that particular window in the moments after the assassination?  Unreal how the contrarians deflect from the obvious point to minutia.  Now where is the long-awaited explanation for why anyone would move the boxes in the moments after the assassination while law enforcement was closing in on the building?  Waiting, waiting.

 Now where is the long-awaited explanation for why anyone would move the boxes in the moments after the assassination while law enforcement was closing in on the building?  Waiting, waiting.

You'll have to wait forever.....  because you're not smart enough to OPEN your eyes and SEE.....   The window sill box was moved between the Powell and Dillard photos..... But you've got the chronology backwards....  Powell too his photo BEFORE Tom Dillard took his photo...

[Martin Weidmann]

LOL.  Classic contrarian logic.  Jackson directed Dillard to the window from which he saw the rifle and Dillard took the photo.  Jackson saw the rifle and directed Dillard to the window to take the photograph.  Got it.  But contrarians are obsessed on whether it was technically Jackson's photo.  HA HA HA.  The point being that Jackson saw the rifle as corroborated by the photo.  Why else would Jackson direct attention to that particular window in the moments after the assassination?  Unreal how the contrarians deflect from the obvious point to minutia.  Now where is the long-awaited explanation for why anyone would move the boxes in the moments after the assassination while law enforcement was closing in on the building?  Waiting, waiting.

Jackson directed Dillard to the window from which he saw the rifle and Dillard took the photo.

So this claim;

Robert Jackson took a photo of the window moments after the assassination because he saw the rifle.

was an outright lie, pure and simple.... Got it!

The point being that Jackson saw the rifle as corroborated by the photo.

No. There is no corroboration at all. Dillard took a photo which does not show a rifle sticking out of the window.
Also, there is no confirmation that Dillard took the photo at Jackson's direction. You are making stuff up again.

Unreal how the contrarians deflect from the obvious point to minutia.

When dealing with a proven habitual liar who doesn't give a damn about actual facts and evidence, like you, details and truth matter.

Your "obvious point" is more often than not just an assumption.