Poll claims Oswald seen as a-hole

[John Iacoletti]

So many words but again no answer.   Do you accept the only possible implication of your conclusion that Oswald could not have come down the stairs unnoticed or not?  If he didn't come down the stairs as you claim, then he couldn't be the assassin.  Is that your position or not?  It's a simple question.

Yet more insipid posturing and no evidence of Oswald being on the sixth floor at 12:30.

[Walt Cakebread]

Yet more insipid posturing and no evidence of Oswald being on the sixth floor at 12:30.

No evidence of Oswald being on the sixth floor at 12:30.

True!..... But there is evidence that Lee was in the 1st flor lunchroom at 12:27....  He saw Jarman and Norman walk by that lunchroom at about 12:27.

[Martin Weidmann]

Anybody with conclusive evidence would hold it high and announce that he has that conclusive evidence, and show it to the whole wide world.

I saw a photo in this morning's paper....  A Trump protestor was holding a placard  that read...." Nobody is above the law"

Watta  naive  simpleton!!.....  He had to be a LNer.....   

Anybody with conclusive evidence would hold it high and announce that he has that conclusive evidence, and show it to the whole wide world.

Exactly right, Walt. But "Richard" doesn't do that and instead he tries - in vain - to put the onus on me. That, by itself, is enough to conclude that "Richard" does not have the evidence to show that Oswald was on the 6th floor at 12:30 and/or that he came down the stairs, without being noticed, within roughly 75 seconds after the last shot.

If this case had even gone to trial the prosecution (if they were stupid enough to make the claims "Richard" has been making) would be laughed out of court.

[Richard Smith]

The only one who is desperately trying to avoid to answer a simple question is you. It's beyond hilarious!

Stop playing silly games and just provide an explanation for how Oswald could have gone down the stairs unnoticed within roughly 75 seconds after the last shot.

Did you take lessons from Mike Lindell, who also constantly claims to have conclusive evidence and never produces it?

I've answered your question a dozen times.  Here it is again.  There is simply insufficient information from the evidence to conclude that Oswald could not have used the stairs.  In fact, the opposite.  The evidence places him on the 6th floor at 12:30 and then in the 2nd floor lunchroom a few minutes later.  Therefore, we know without any doubt whatsoever that he could have gone down the stairs unnoticed because that is the only possible way he could have gotten from these two points in the known timeframe.  The best evidence that a thing is possible is that it happened.  That is how evidence and logic work.

Again, no answer from you.  Do you accept the only possible implication of your own conclusion that Oswald couldn't have come down the stairs unnoticed or not?  Why the struggle to avoid accepting the only conclusion that can be drawn from YOUR own claim?  It is very amusing.  You go on and on suggesting that you have proved something but then won't acknowledge the only conclusion that can be drawn from your claim having validity.  An exercise in self-loathing?  Or dim awareness of the absurdity of your claim?  Either way it's greatly amusing to watch you run away.

[Martin Weidmann]

I've answered your question a dozen times.  Here it is again.  There is simply insufficient information from the evidence to conclude that Oswald could not have used the stairs.  In fact, the opposite.  The evidence places him on the 6th floor at 12:30 and then in the 2nd floor lunchroom a few minutes later.  Therefore, we know without any doubt whatsoever that he could have gone down the stairs unnoticed because that is the only possible way he could have gotten from these two points in the known timeframe.  The best evidence that a thing is possible is that it happened.  That is how evidence and logic work.

Again, no answer from you.  Do you accept the only possible implication of your own conclusion that Oswald couldn't have come down the stairs unnoticed or not?  Why the struggle to avoid accepting the only conclusion that can be drawn from YOUR own claim?  It is very amusing.  You go on and on suggesting that you have proved something but then won't acknowledge the only conclusion that can be drawn from your claim having validity.  An exercise in self-loathing?  Or dim awareness of the absurdity of your claim?  Either way it's greatly amusing to watch you run away.

I've answered your question a dozen times.  Here it is again.  There is simply insufficient information from the evidence to conclude that Oswald could not have used the stairs.  In fact, the opposite.  The evidence places him on the 6th floor at 12:30 and then in the 2nd floor lunchroom a few minutes later. 

That's not an answer. It's utter BS and assumption piled on assumption. In the real world, there is no evidence whatsoever that places Oswald on the 6th floor at 12:30 and no matter how often you repeat this bogus claim, it will never be true. If there was such evidence you would have presented it a long time ago and this discussion would not have continued. There mere fact that you haven't presented this elusive evidence is enough to conclude that it doesn't exist.

Therefore, we know without any doubt whatsoever that he could have gone down the stairs unnoticed because that is the only possible way he could have gotten from these two points in the known timeframe.  The best evidence that a thing is possible is that it happened. 

Hilarious. It's pure speculation based on the unproven and thus false premise that Oswald was in fact on the 6th floor at 12:30.

That is how evidence and logic work.

More stupidity. There is only evidence in your imagination and calling it "logic" to "prove" one assumption with another assumption is just pathetic.

The bottom line is that you have no evidence whatsoever that places Oswald on the 6th floor when the shots were fired and/or for how he could have managed to go down the stairs within roughly 75 seconds after the last shot. You are just making stuff up and calling it evidence.   

[Richard Smith]

I've answered your question a dozen times.  Here it is again.  There is simply insufficient information from the evidence to conclude that Oswald could not have used the stairs.  In fact, the opposite.  The evidence places him on the 6th floor at 12:30 and then in the 2nd floor lunchroom a few minutes later. 

That's not an answer. It's utter BS and assumption piled on assumption. In the real world, there is no evidence whatsoever that places Oswald on the 6th floor at 12:30 and no matter how often you repeat this bogus claim, it will never be true. If there was such evidence you would have presented it a long time ago and this discussion would not have continued. There mere fact that you haven't presented this elusive evidence is enough to conclude that it doesn't exist.

Therefore, we know without any doubt whatsoever that he could have gone down the stairs unnoticed because that is the only possible way he could have gotten from these two points in the known timeframe.  The best evidence that a thing is possible is that it happened. 

Hilarious. It's pure speculation based on the unproven and thus false premise that Oswald was in fact on the 6th floor at 12:30.

That is how evidence and logic work.

More stupidity. There is only evidence in your imagination and calling it "logic" to "prove" one assumption with another assumption is just pathetic.

The bottom line is that you have no evidence whatsoever that places Oswald on the 6th floor when the shots were fired and/or for how he could have managed to go down the stairs within roughly 75 seconds after the last shot. You are just making stuff up and calling it evidence.   

Again, no answer to the question posed.  And you are really saying again there is "no" evidence Oswald was on the 6th floor?  None? Just his rifle and fired bullet casings from that rifle by the window from which multiple witnesses saw a rifle pointing out the window at 12:30.  Laughable.  Remind me again.  You are not a CTer - right?  Just a neutral party who claims Oswald couldn't have come down the stairs to the 2nd floor.  The only way he could have got there had he been the assassin.  And he left no evidence on the 6th floor.  HA HA HA.  But you won't confirm that your position is that Oswald is innocent.  He just couldn't have done it per your own analysis. 

[Martin Weidmann]

Again, no answer to the question posed.  And you are really saying again there is "no" evidence Oswald was on the 6th floor?  None? Just his rifle and fired bullet casings from that rifle by the window from which multiple witnesses saw a rifle pointing out the window at 12:30.  Laughable.  Remind me again.  You are not a CTer - right?  Just a neutral party who claims Oswald couldn't have come down the stairs to the 2nd floor.  The only way he could have got there had he been the assassin.  And he left no evidence on the 6th floor.  HA HA HA.  But you won't confirm that your position is that Oswald is innocent.  He just couldn't have done it per your own analysis.

Just his rifle

"his rifle" LOL

and fired bullet casings from that rifle

there is no evidence those bullet casings were fired by the MC rifle on that day. In fact, it can't even be shown that the rifle itself was fired on 11/22/63.

by the window from which multiple witnesses saw a rifle pointing out the window at 12:30.

And how exactly does any of this prove, other than by pure flawed assumption, that Oswald was on the 6th floor at 12:30?

Answer: It doesn't!

And he left no evidence on the 6th floor.  HA HA HA.

I've noticed you frequently laugh about your own stupidity. How in the world can you claim that Oswald left evidence on the 6th floor when you can't even prove that he was there when the shots were fired?