Jesse Curry Interviews Nov 1963

[Walt Cakebread]

No LNer believes that is an accurate timeline.   Oswald's movements in minutes leading up to the assassination are uncertain.  The evidence, however, places him in the SN at 12:30 beyond any doubt.  You have also falsely suggested that JFK's car was "behind the foliage of a tree" when the shots were fired.  As apparent from the WC recreation of the event, his car was in a clear line of sight on Elm from Oswald's window when he was struck.    An easy shot for Oswald who was trained in the USMC.

No LNer believes that is an accurate timeline.

OK ,    Mr "Smith" if that's not an accurate time line ....then perhaps you can present an accurate one...starting at 12:27 when Lee saw Jarman and Norman walk by the 1st floor lunchroom.

[Richard Smith]

No LNer believes that is an accurate timeline.

OK ,    Mr "Smith" if that's not an accurate time line ....then perhaps you can present an accurate one...starting at 12:27 when Lee saw Jarman and Norman walk by the 1st floor lunchroom.

There is insufficient information to reconstruct Oswald's movements before the assassination.  There was no real cause of others to take notice of him or the specific time down to the precise minute of mundane events that were occurring in the building before the assassination.  What we know with certainty is that Oswald was in the SN at 12:30 based upon the evidence that he left behind.

[Richard Smith]

Notice the Loons also have Oswald incapable of assembling the rifle despite having all morning to do so. In the Land O' Loons, if Oswald had assembled the rifle before noon, the rifle would have been left out in the open and noticed. No LN scenario or evaluation of the evidence is possible. Why do they love this Oswald? A shared hatred of authority?

Yes, it's a reoccurring pattern.  And, of course, we are constantly told that Oswald couldn't have done things that someone else apparently could.  Oswald would require "superpowers" to perform these mundane acts while some stranger on the floor apparently could pull it off and escape unnoticed.  Repeat endlessly.

[Walt Cakebread]

Notice the Loons also have Oswald incapable of assembling the rifle despite having all morning to do so. In the Land O' Loons, if Oswald had assembled the rifle before noon, the rifle would have been left out in the open and noticed. No LN scenario or evaluation of the evidence is possible. Why do they love this Oswald? A shared hatred of authority?

Dear Mr Tiny Organ.... Are you aware that Mr "Smith" provided me with the information that Lee hid the paper sack that contained the  disassembled rifle and then retrieved that sack with the rifle in it just before he shot JFK? 

If you have a problem with Mr "Smith's" statement then perhaps you can present a different scenario.    But you need to keep in mind that the rifle could not have been assembled in less than five minutes .....so if you believe that Lee assembled the rifle while other workers were moving about then he would have run the risk of being caught with the rifle.   

[Walt Cakebread]

Yes, it's a reoccurring pattern.  And, of course, we are constantly told that Oswald couldn't have done things that someone else apparently could.  Oswald would require "superpowers" to perform these mundane acts while some stranger on the floor apparently could pull it off and escape unnoticed.  Repeat endlessly.

Wottsamatter wit you, Mr "Smith"? ....  Can't you provide me with a time line for Lee Oswald starting at the time (12:27) that he saw Jarman and Norman walk by the 1st floor lunchroom.

[Walt Cakebread]

There is insufficient information to reconstruct Oswald's movements before the assassination.  There was no real cause of others to take notice of him or the specific time down to the precise minute of mundane events that were occurring in the building before the assassination.  What we know with certainty is that Oswald was in the SN at 12:30 based upon the evidence that he left behind.

What we know with certainty is that Oswald was in the SN at 12:30 based upon the evidence that he left behind.

Really?..... You can know that Lee was in the so called "Sniper's Nest"  at 12:30 based upon the evidence that was found there?

Please enlighten me .... Let's start with the spent shells....( Originally there were only TWO shells but that number had to be changed after most witnesses reported that they heard more than two explosions.)  But HOW do those spent shells provide any information about when they were fired?

We'll move along to another piece of "Evidence" after you present your answer.....

[Walt Cakebread]

Where does any LNer say Oswald started for the 6th floor at 12:27?

I think it's possible Oswald took the rifle to work without disassembling it. An inch or two of the barrel end sticking out, easily concealed by holding the bag at the top and tucking the open end in between Frazier's back seat and seat back.

As for Oswald being too stupid or naive to figure out a way to assembly/unpackaged the rifle and place it somewhere without being noticed, is this one of those "superpowers" he would have required?

Where does any LNer say Oswald started for the 6th floor at 12:27?


Well, since Lee Oswald saw Jarman and Norman walk by the 1st floor lunchroom at about 12:27 he couldn't have started climbing the stairs to the 6th floor any earlier....  I'd hasten to remind you that  Jarman testified that they arrived on the fifth floor at 12:28. so they walked by the lunchroom at about 12:26 / 12;27.

I think it's possible Oswald took the rifle to work without disassembling it. An inch or two of the barrel end sticking out, easily concealed by holding the bag at the top and tucking the open end in between Frazier's back seat and seat back.

That's not what it says in your bible Mr. Organ......   Are you a heretic?