Why didn't the WC issue an interim report?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Why didn't the WC issue an interim report?  (Read 18955 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Why didn't the WC issue an interim report?
« Reply #7 on: June 28, 2022, 02:22:40 AM »
Of course we all know [as you guys like to assert]........ no one ever really looked for any.
They just went with the FBI cover-up report that was concluded less than a month after the assassination.
The following February this was shown on a Life magazine cover -------



Proving supposedly that Oswald was a killer ::)

As if that "wanted poster" photo on the cover of LIFE was not  enough......Life was determined to inform the public who viewed this copy of LIFE that  "Lee Harvey Oswald shown with the guns he used to kill President Kennedy and Officer Tippit."

At the time LIFE was a well respected and widely read publication ....If it appeared in LIFE it was the truth....

PS:   Not all copies of LIFE had that caption printed boldly on the cover....

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Why didn't the WC issue an interim report?
« Reply #8 on: June 28, 2022, 02:41:59 AM »
Amazingly, conspiracy theorists don't feel the slightest twinge of discomfort or uneasiness when they dump in the trash the conclusions reached by all of these entities --- the Warren Commission, the HSCA, the Clark Panel, and the Rockefeller Commission.

False appeal to authority fallacy. Next?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Why didn't the WC issue an interim report?
« Reply #9 on: June 28, 2022, 03:04:30 AM »

I think that if LBJ had really wanted the report finalized significantly earlier that he probably would have had it. The way it was released a few weeks before the election, I believe, worked better for LBJ, politically, than a significantly earlier (interim or final) report would have. Just my opinion.


Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: Why didn't the WC issue an interim report?
« Reply #10 on: June 28, 2022, 03:11:43 AM »


The CT version of this would have everyone but LHO saying that to each other….  :D

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Why didn't the WC issue an interim report?
« Reply #11 on: June 28, 2022, 04:58:23 AM »
The CT version of this would have everyone but LHO saying that to each other….  :D

that cartoon comes from this
5 Stupid things about JFK conspiracy theories
« Last Edit: June 28, 2022, 04:59:38 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Why didn't the WC issue an interim report?
« Reply #12 on: June 28, 2022, 05:41:36 AM »


They just went with the FBI cover-up report that was concluded less than a month after the assassination.

Either you are joking or you are just completely unaware of what took place in this investigation.
Where is the joke? And Collins...Cut the crap.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Why didn't the WC issue an interim report?
« Reply #13 on: June 28, 2022, 07:28:37 AM »
Absolutely, since they already knew the conclusion when the "investigation" began.
Basically, that's what I stated earlier but I am apparently "unaware" of whatever.
As far as the Rockefeller and the Church Committee stuff...I suppose Mr Galbraith has thoroughly read these reports and could share some insight that the Warren gang did not supply.
The FBI and CIA investigated themselves and found nothing wrong.
"CBS and NBC investigations"? What witnesses did they call that we don't know about?
Question above.... 
Quote
How many investigations are needed?
Answer= one still needed.