The Initials Of FBI Agent Elmer Todd Are On CE399 (Hi-Def Photo Proof)

[John Iacoletti]

So who shot J.D. Tippit?

Was it the Easter bunny (who looked just exactly like Lee Oswald)?

Where did you get the silly idea that Tippit’s killer “looked just exactly like Lee Oswald”?

[David Von Pein]

So who shot J.D. Tippit?
Was it the Easter bunny (who looked just exactly like Lee Oswald)?

I have no idea. It is possible Oswald was indeed there and did it, but the evidence I have seen simply isn't conclusive enough to justify that conclusion.

You're joking, right? (You must be.)

[John Iacoletti]

You're joking, right? (You must be.)

He’s talking about real evidence, not your silly rhetoric.

[David Von Pein]

Where did you get the silly idea that Tippit’s killer “looked just exactly like Lee Oswald”?

Well, as far as I can tell, Lee Harvey Oswald DID look just exactly like Lee Harvey Oswald.

[Martin Weidmann]

You're joking, right? (You must be.)

No.

Let me ask you this; do you believe it is possible that Oswald was not on 10th street?

[David Von Pein]

No.

Let me ask you this; do you believe it is possible that Oswald was not on 10th street?

No. Absolutely not possible.

The best possible combination of evidence that could possibly exist (lacking a confession from the killer) does, indeed, exist in the Tippit murder case --- i.e., (1) more than half-a-dozen witnesses who positively identified Oswald as either the killer of Tippit or as the man who was leaving the scene of the shooting holding a gun and (2) the culprit being caught with the murder weapon in his very own hands at the time of his arrest (which was just half-an-hour after Officer Tippit was gunned down).

You couldn't get a better "evidence combination" to prove that Lee Harvey Oswald killed J.D. Tippit.

CTers will argue that there's "no evidence" at all against Oswald for Tippit's slaying. And they'll argue that they think the cops tampered with the shells AND did a switch-a-roo with the revolver.

But where's the PROOF that ANY evidence WAS tampered with? Do the CTers have any such PROOF? Of course they don't.

[Paul J Cummings]

That's hard to do when witnesses had Oswald in theatre when Tippit was shot. Amazing how the names of the people in the theatre just disappeared. Poof gone.

No. Absolutely not possible.

The best possible combination of evidence that could possibly exist (lacking a confession from the killer) does, indeed, exist in the Tippit murder case --- i.e., (1) more than half-a-dozen witnesses who positively identified Oswald as either the killer of Tippit or as the man who was leaving the scene of the shooting holding a gun and (2) the culprit being caught with the murder weapon in his very own hands at the time of his arrest (which was just half-an-hour after Officer Tippit was gunned down).

You couldn't get a better "evidence combination" to prove that Lee Harvey Oswald killed J.D. Tippit.

CTers will argue that there's "no evidence" at all against Oswald for Tippit's slaying. And they'll argue that they think the cops tampered with the shells AND did a switch-a-roo with the revolver.

But where's the PROOF that ANY evidence WAS tampered with? Do the CTers have any such PROOF? Of course they don't.