The Initials Of FBI Agent Elmer Todd Are On CE399 (Hi-Def Photo Proof)

[David Von Pein]

Is this supposed to be evidence too? Why did Charles Givens not come back?

He did. But he couldn't get back into the building.

Mr. GIVENS (WC Testimony) --- So I stood there for a while, and I went over to try to get to the building after they found out the shots came from there, and when I went over to try to get back in the officer at the door wouldn't let me in.

[Martin Weidmann]

Well, as of 1988 at least, it would appear as though Jim Garrison was one such CTer. Here's what he said in '88:

"Lee Oswald was totally, unequivocally, completely innocent of the assassination .... and the fact that history, or in the re-writing of history, disinformation has made a villain out of this young man who wanted nothing more than to be a fine Marine .... is in some ways the greatest injustice of all." -- Jim Garrison; Spoken during an on-camera interview for the A&E Cable-TV mini-series "The Men Who Killed Kennedy" (Part 4; "The Patsy") (1988)

And there was also a CTer named J. Raymond Carroll, plus several other people I've talked to over the years online that have at least given me the impression that they believed Oswald was snow-white innocent on 11/22.

Can you understand that Oswald could have been part of some scheme and still be innocent of the actual assassination?

The more I read and learn about Oswald, the more I start to consider the possibility that he was manipulated to do things that later could and were used against him.

[Paul J Cummings]

Well if Oswald was looking for a phone to use it wasn't going to be in the TSBD or Dal-Tex building. 

Is this supposed to be evidence too? Why did Charles Givens not come back?

[John Iacoletti]

Says who? Besides the cab driver whose statements are in question who saw Oswald take the cab?

Not only that, but even if Oswald did take a cab, who says he intended to go directly to the rooming house when he got in the cab?

This is just another one of those “X seems to me like something a guilty person would do” arguments, which is rhetoric, not evidence.

[John Iacoletti]

Again, if you have any evidence please provide it. Otherwise all of your innuendo just makes you look like a typical paranoid.

Typical “My assumptions are automatically correct unless you prove me wrong” argument.

[Paul J Cummings]

IMO he didn't take the cab. The WC would've lined up witnesses and instead he was manufactured to fit their narrative.

[John Iacoletti]

He did. But he couldn't get back into the building.

At which point he left.

Why wasn't he the slightest bit interested in hanging around and seeing what all the commotion was all about? He must have been guilty.