The Initials Of FBI Agent Elmer Todd Are On CE399 (Hi-Def Photo Proof)

[David Von Pein]

During the last several years, Jim DiEugenio has many times made a big deal out of Elmer Todd's initials in my discussions with him. When a search is performed at my JFK Archives website for "Elmer Todd" and "James DiEugenio" and "CE399", several separate discussions pop up:

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/search?q=Elmer+Todd;+James+DiEugenio;+CE399&updated-max=2015-07-10T02:16:00-07:00&max-results=20&start=10&by-date=false

Sample argument from October 3, 2012:

ROBERT HARRIS -- "Those initials [of FBI agent Elmer Todd] are not on CE399."

DAVID VON PEIN -- "Yes, they are. You just can't see them in the NARA photos."

JAMES DiEUGENIO -- "This has now gone beyond absurdity. Davey Boy, everyone here is still waiting for you to put your money where your mouth is. Something you never ever do. In other words...go to Travelocity, book a flight and a hotel room, and go ahead and do what you have been saying you would do for ages: Prove John Hunt is a liar."

DAVID VON PEIN -- "Yeah, right, Jimbo. Like the NARA is going to allow me to just waltz right in and examine CE399. Get real. Fact is: John Hunt DID NOT examine the bullet itself. He examined the same photos that have been posted in this very thread. And those photos (as good as they might be) are not definitive proof that Todd did not mark CE399. Plus: There are TWO separate (and corroborating) official FBI documents that tell us that Elmer Todd DID mark the bullet (CD7 and CE2011). And CD7 confirms that Todd marked the bullet on the day of the assassination itself. Spit on those records if you want to; call them fake if you want to (and you do want to, naturally). But I'm not willing to do so. Period."

Now back to 2022:

Mr. DiEugenio now has no choice but to drop the "Todd's Initials Aren't On The Bullet" argument. Or maybe he'll say the initials were faked and added by somebody other than Todd. Ya think?

[Martin Weidmann]

During the last several years, Jim DiEugenio has many times made a big deal out of Elmer Todd's initials in my discussions with him. When a search is performed at my JFK Archives website for "Elmer Todd" and "James DiEugenio" and "CE399", several separate discussions pop up:

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/search?q=Elmer+Todd;+James+DiEugenio;+CE399&updated-max=2015-07-10T02:16:00-07:00&max-results=20&start=10&by-date=false

Sample argument from October 3, 2012:

DAVID VON PEIN -- "[The initials of FBI agent Elmer Lee Todd are on Bullet CE399 in the National Archives.] You just can't see them in the NARA photos."

JAMES DiEUGENIO -- "This has now gone beyond absurdity. Davey Boy, everyone here is still waiting for you to put your money where your mouth is. Something you never ever do. In other words...go to Travelocity, book a flight and a hotel room, and go ahead and do what you have been saying you would do for ages: Prove John Hunt is a liar."

DAVID VON PEIN -- "Yeah, right, Jimbo. Like the NARA is going to allow me to just waltz right in and examine CE399. Get real. Fact is: John Hunt DID NOT examine the bullet itself. He examined the same photos that have been posted in this very thread. And those photos (as good as they might be) are not definitive proof that Todd did not mark CE399. Plus: There are TWO separate (and corroborating) official FBI documents that tell us that Elmer Todd DID mark the bullet (CD7 and CE2011). And CD7 confirms that Todd marked the bullet on the day of the assassination itself. Spit on those records if you want to; call them fake if you want to (and you do want to, naturally). But I'm not willing to do so. Period."

Now back to 2022:

Mr. DiEugenio now has no choice but to drop the "Todd's Initials Aren't On The Bullet" argument. Or maybe he'll say the initials were faked and added by somebody other than Todd. Ya think?

Why are you posting about your interactions with Jim DiEugenio when he's not a member here?

You seem desperate for attention.

[David Von Pein]

Why are you posting about your interactions with Jim DiEugenio when he's not a member here?

Why not?

Plus:

Any time a chance exists to make a longtime conspiracy clown look even more like a clown---why should such an opportunity go to waste? 

[Martin Weidmann]

Any time a chance exists to make a longtime conspiracy clown look even more like a clown---why should such an opportunity go to waste? 

Yeah, I thought it was something sick like that. Posting stuff about somebody who isn't a member and thus won't reply.

Weak, pathethic, underhand and exactly what I would expect from a LN weasel.

You've told us just about everything we need to know about you and it isn't pretty.

It's one thing to simply disagree about the facts of this case. That would be civil. This, on the other hand, isn't. Anything but!

[David Von Pein]

Yeah, I thought it was something sick like that. Posting stuff about somebody who isn't a member and thus won't reply.

Weak, pathethic, underhand[ed] and exactly what I would expect from a LN weasel.

You've told us just about everything we need to know about you and it isn't pretty.

It's one thing to simply disagree about the facts of this case. That would be civil. This, on the other hand, isn't. Anything but!

^^^^ From the desk of Saint Martin. ^^^^

[Martin Weidmann]

^^^^ From the desk of Saint Martin. ^^^^

Said the clown who is posting this crap.

Pretty obvious who is the Saint and who is the low life.

Which makes me wonder why this is so important to you. All this went down nearly sixty years ago and nowadays only a small minority is even interested. The rest are so ignorant that all they know (if they know anything at all) that Kennedy was killed by some guy shooting from a building. So, what in the world motivates you to conduct a bogus propaganda campaign against a guy who died nearly sixty years ago and who may or may not have killed Kennedy?

Get a life, will ya..

[David Von Pein]

Which makes me wonder why this is so important to you. All this went down nearly sixty years ago and nowadays only a small minority is even interested. The rest are so ignorant that all they know (if they know anything at all) that Kennedy was killed by some guy shooting from a building. So, what in the world motivates you to conduct a bogus propaganda campaign against a guy who died nearly sixty years ago and who may or may not have killed Kennedy?

Get a life, will ya..

^^^^ From the desk of a man who just made his 5400th post relating to the JFK assassination at just this one forum alone!
And that's just his total since January 6, 2018. Prior to the forum's re-boot following the 2018 hacker attack, who knows how
many more thousands of posts Saint Martin racked up.

I have made one-fourteenth the number of posts at this forum when compared to Saint Martin's tally, and yet (per the saint named
Martin) it is I who needs to "Get a life".

Beautiful.