Next to Oswald's Rifle

[Zeon Mason]

Walt, maybe you can offer some evidence to support that CE 399 could not possibly have fired from an MC rifle in the worn grooves  condition as described.

Or someone who
Had an MC rifle with worn grooves and pitting could put to the range and video record test firing some ball nosed MC bulliets of same tile as CE 399 and then compare the bullets.

[Walt Cakebread]

Walt, maybe you can offer some evidence to support that CE 399 could not possibly have fired from an MC rifle in the worn grooves  condition as described.

Or someone who
Had an MC rifle with worn grooves and pitting could put to the range and video record test firing some ball nosed MC bulliets of same tile as CE 399 and then compare the bullets.

maybe you can offer some evidence to support that CE 399 could not possibly have fired from an MC rifle in the worn grooves  condition as described.

Zeon I can see in photos of CE 399 ( the "Magic Bullet" ) that it was fired through a rifle barrel that was in good condition.  Anybody who wants to verify this observation merely has to take a good clear picture of CE 399 to any gunsmith or gun enthusiast  and ask their opinion about the condition of the rifle barrel through which CE 399 had been fired.

I guess I could fire a bullet through the barrel of one of my carcanos with a worn bore and then take a photo of the bullet but the naysayers (truth deniers) wouldn't believe me anyway so it would be a waste of time.
 

[Michael Walton]

So, you weren't joking??

Compare the shadow under Ruby's nose as compared to the original man and the man on the far left.
Compare the texture of the Ruby pasted insert.
Compare the lower resolution of the Ruby insert.
The outer ear of the original man wasn't removed in the Ruby version.
Just look at the edges of Ruby's face which was clipped out with garden shears.





JohnM

There is a shift between the Ruby face and the other person, which means you did not do a good job of aligning the genuine Ruby photo and the other person. The other person was pasted over the Ruby one and I'd appreciate it if you would stop trying to muddle the record creating very poorly done GIFs.

Dick and Jack were already planning the assassination back during this initiation meeting with Bush and Sturgis. Hence, the smiles and laughter.

[Dan O'meara]

There is a shift between the Ruby face and the other person, which means you did not do a good job of aligning the genuine Ruby photo and the other person. The other person was pasted over the Ruby one and I'd appreciate it if you would stop trying to muddle the record creating very poorly done GIFs.

Dick and Jack were already planning the assassination back during this initiation meeting with Bush and Sturgis. Hence, the smiles and laughter.

Someone needs help.

[Paul J Cummings]

Totally disagree. Any other photo to corroborate this one perhaps taken at the same time? Again it looks photo shopped.

[Jerry Freeman]

Oswald had been in custody for hours by this point and was already being viewed as the sole assassin of JFK so the "artist's sketch" is a mystery indeed. As I say, I can find no reference to it as part of the evidence being taken by the FBI but it is there in the photo, so what gives with that? It really is baffling.

Oswald had been in custody for hours and was already being viewed presented as the sole assassin of JFK ...
                                       

[Jerry Freeman]

I fail to see any explanation as to the absence of a third spent round.
Mr Brown...Mr Mytton....Mr Smith....anyone?