Brown/Weidmann, Mini-Debate?

[Richard Smith]

Try to come up with something original next time. After losing all credibility a long time ago, your act is wearing thin.

Don't they have any anger management classes in "Europe"?

What makes you think I was angry? I know you've lost grip on reality a long time ago, but this is extreme, even for you. In fact I was laughing out loud about the stupidity of your "totality of evidence" question.

John Iacoletti was right;

I would only have added; Why is he even here every day?

You are one of the angriest posters here as evidenced by your constant insults.  Not just to myself but everyone who you engage with.  The same pattern over and over.  Going on and on taking your own nonsense so seriously but then being unable to answer a simple question without resorting to personal insults until the thread digresses.  A thousand such examples.  You are asking me why I'm here after you just claimed not to be interested in whether Oswald was guilty or innocent!   HA HA HA.  That is comedy gold. 

[Martin Weidmann]

You are one of the angriest posters here as evidenced by your constant insults.  Not just to myself but everyone who you engage with.  The same pattern over and over.  Going on and on taking your own nonsense so seriously but then being unable to answer a simple question without resorting to personal insults until the thread digresses.  A thousand such examples.  You are asking me why I'm here after you just claimed not to be interested in whether Oswald was guilty or innocent!   HA HA HA.  That is comedy gold.

You are one of the angriest posters here as evidenced by your constant insults.

He said angerly in yet another one of his post in which anything but the case is discussed.

Pot meet kettle. You want dish it out but can't take it. Oh what a poor little puppy...

[Richard Smith]

You are one of the angriest posters here as evidenced by your constant insults.

He said angerly in yet another one of his post in which anything but the case is discussed.

Pot meet kettle. You want dish it out but can't take it. Oh what a poor little puppy...

If you don't like the answer, then don't ask the question.  Maybe don't begin responses with "Fool" if you don't want to be called out for insulting others and being out of control with your emotions. 

[Martin Weidmann]

If you don't like the answer, then don't ask the question.  Maybe don't begin responses with "Fool" if you don't want to be called out for insulting others and being out of control with your emotions.

What answer?

Still trying to provoke me? 

Try discussing the evidence for once.

[Richard Smith]

What answer?

Still trying to provoke me? 

Try discussing the evidence for once.

Your question: "What makes you think I was angry?"

The answer:  Beginning responses by calling someone a "fool."  Something you do frequently to myself and just about anyone who points out the absurdity of your approach to this case.  Which is most anyone who bothers to respond to you. 

[Martin Weidmann]

Your question: "What makes you think I was angry?"

The answer:  Beginning responses by calling someone a "fool."  Something you do frequently to myself and just about anyone who points out the absurdity of your approach to this case.  Which is most anyone who bothers to respond to you.

The guy who does nothing else but try to ridicule people in every way he can, and clearly considers himself to be superior enough to "point out the absurdity of their approach" to others (what an ego!), has his feelings hurt by being called a fool, while acting like one. HA HA HA HA, that's comedy gold

Btw, this thread's subject is a discussion between Bill Brown and myself about when exactly Callaway helped to load Tippit into the ambulance. In all your posts in this thread you haven't mentioned or said anything about the topic. Not a single word. That really tells us all we need to know about your presence on this board.

[Richard Smith]

The guy who does nothing else but try to ridicule people in every way he can, and clearly considers himself to be superior enough to "point out the absurdity of their approach" to others (what an ego!), has his feelings hurt by being called a fool, while acting like one. HA HA HA HA, that's comedy gold

Btw, this thread's subject is a discussion between Bill Brown and myself about when exactly Callaway helped to load Tippit into the ambulance. In all your posts in this thread you haven't mentioned or said anything about the topic. Not a single word. That really tells us all we need to know about your presence on this board.

I spent considerable time discussing that topic which was the basis of your tantrum.  The timeline of events does not, as you erroneously imply, have any relevance as to Oswald's guilt in the murder of J.D. Tippit.  The totality of evidence proves beyond any doubt that Oswald was present at the scene at the moment of the crime.  Whatever time that occurred. The only relevance this discussion has is to when Oswald murdered Tippit.  As a result, the resolution of the order of every event isn't of much importance except as a matter of historical curiosity even if it were somehow possible to resolve nearly six decades later.   Which it isn't to any degree of certainty.  I suppose the color of Oswald's socks that day is deemed important to some because everything he did that day, as the assassin of the president, has some historical significance.  But pontificating like it matters is absurd and humorous.