The bus transfer

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The bus transfer  (Read 59721 times)

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
Re: The bus transfer
« Reply #35 on: April 04, 2022, 02:59:21 AM »
Johnny Brewers story also changed through the years.
Even his original version was bogus.

The shoe store guy was "in" on the plot?  And his role was to get a job at the shoe store and hope Oswald passed it on the way to the movies after assassinating JFK so that he could direct the authorities to him?  Amazing foresight by the conspirators.  Was there anyone in Dallas other than Oswald who was not involved in the assassination?

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: The bus transfer
« Reply #36 on: April 04, 2022, 11:33:51 AM »
The shoe store guy was "in" on the plot?  And his role was to get a job at the shoe store and hope Oswald passed it on the way to the movies after assassinating JFK so that he could direct the authorities to him?  Amazing foresight by the conspirators.  Was there anyone in Dallas other than Oswald who was not involved in the assassination?

Amazing exaggeration and a pathetic strawman. Typical Richard Smith material

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
Re: The bus transfer
« Reply #37 on: April 04, 2022, 04:00:46 PM »
Amazing exaggeration and a pathetic strawman. Typical Richard Smith material

Typical Martin contrarian material lacking any substance.   How about explaining to us what is being suggested then?  Jerry indicated that Brewer's "original version was bogus."  Why would Brewer make a "bogus" report to the authorities under these circumstances?   What exactly was "bogus" about it and why would he make "bogus" statements.   What he indicated is fairly straightforward.  He saw a man who he believed was acting suspiciously.  He followed that man a short distance.  That man went into the TT.  The police found that man in the TT.  That man was Oswald. 

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: The bus transfer
« Reply #38 on: April 04, 2022, 04:38:49 PM »
Typical Martin contrarian material lacking any substance.   How about explaining to us what is being suggested then?  Jerry indicated that Brewer's "original version was bogus."  Why would Brewer make a "bogus" report to the authorities under these circumstances?   What exactly was "bogus" about it and why would he make "bogus" statements.   What he indicated is fairly straightforward.  He saw a man who he believed was acting suspiciously.  He followed that man a short distance.  That man went into the TT.  The police found that man in the TT.  That man was Oswald.

Typical Martin contrarian material lacking any substance.

Which only tells us that you don't understand the meaning of the word "contrarian".

There was nothing contrarian about my factual statement that you exaggerated, as per usual, and resorted to a strawman.


How about explaining to us what is being suggested then?

Why in the world should I explain something I have not suggested?

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: The bus transfer
« Reply #39 on: April 04, 2022, 07:37:14 PM »
Typical Martin contrarian material lacking any substance.   How about explaining to us what is being suggested then?  Jerry indicated that Brewer's "original version was bogus."  Why would Brewer make a "bogus" report to the authorities under these circumstances?   What exactly was "bogus" about it and why would he make "bogus" statements.   What he indicated is fairly straightforward.  He saw a man who he believed was acting suspiciously.  He followed that man a short distance.  That man went into the TT.  The police found that man in the TT.  That man was Oswald.

"He saw a man who he believed was acting suspiciously.  He followed that man a short distance.  That man went into the TT.  The police found that man in the TT.  That man was Oswald. "

"Acting suspiciously".....    ???   

"That man went into the TT." ...... Brewer did not see the man enter the theater....He saw him enter the vestibule, and assumed that he had entered the theater.....

 The police found that man in the TT. .......   No ...The police found Lee Oswald....  Just as intended.
Three FBI agents were there in the theater, to ensure the cops arrested the patsy.

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
Re: The bus transfer
« Reply #40 on: April 04, 2022, 07:42:01 PM »
"He saw a man who he believed was acting suspiciously.  He followed that man a short distance.  That man went into the TT.  The police found that man in the TT.  That man was Oswald. "

"Acting suspiciously".....    ???   

"That man went into the TT." ...... Brewer did not see the man enter the theater....He saw him enter the vestibule, and assumed that he had entered the theater.....

 The police found that man in the TT. .......   No ...The police found Lee Oswald....  Just as intended.
Three FBI agents were there in the theater, to ensure the cops arrested the patsy.

Far out.   So Brewer was "in" on the conspiracy in your opinion?  And his role was to work at a shoe store waiting for Oswald to pass so that he could call the cops?  Interesting.  Did he have a secret signal like the red rings?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The bus transfer
« Reply #41 on: April 04, 2022, 08:58:57 PM »
Shots fired, but a beautiful day in the neighbourhood if you're an Oswald arse kisser

To wit:

1) Nothing illegal about buggering off from work without first asking permission
2) Nothing illegal about ducking out of sight when poor dumb cops run their sirens in your direction
3) Nothing illegal about looking suspicious
4) Nothing illegal about looking like yourself (unless you mow down a poor dumb cop in cold blood)

Oswald: I'm innocent
CT Judge: Ok, you can go
Oswald: [SMIRK]