Interesting video of Dr Jenkins who was at the autopsy of JFK.

[Martin Weidmann]

Yes , faulty recollection. The autopsy photos and X-Rays do not lie. Custer confirmed that he had taken the three X-Rays of the head.

GUNN: Mr. Custer, we’re going to show you now X-ray No. 1, which has been identified in the 1966 inspection as the “anterior/posterior view of the skull, slightly heat damaged”. My question to you, Mr. Custer. is whether you can identify that as an autopsy X-ray that you took -
CUSTER: Yes, this is definitely an autopsy film.
GUNN: If you could let me finish the question.
CUSTER: I’m sorry.
GUNN: Can you identify that as an autopsy X-ray that you took on the night of November 22nd/23rd 1963?
CUSTER: Yes, sir. Correct.

GUNN: Can look at No. 2 now, please. which is identified in the 1966 Inventory as a right lateral view of the skull with two angle lines overdrawn on the film?
[Interruption to the proceedings.]
CUSTER: Do vou want to repeat the question?
GUNN:The question is: Mr. Custer, can you identify the film that is in front of you now as having been taken by you on the night of the autopsy of President Kennedy?
CUSTER: Correct. Yes, sir, I do.

GUNN: Could we now examine No. 3, which is identified as the lateral view of the skull?
CUSTER: Okay. This is the skull that I took - that I had taken. Same marker on the left side.

Listen from (1:58:05 to 2:00:35), (2:11:00 to 2:12:25), and (2:19:40 to 2:20:35)

Yes , faulty recollection. The autopsy photos and X-Rays do not lie.

Don't they?

There are so many people saying things that do not match the official story and individually they might be dismissed on superficial grounds, but they are never addressed in combination.

[Tim Nickerson]

Yes , faulty recollection. The autopsy photos and X-Rays do not lie.

Don't they?

Not when they've been authenticated six ways from Sunday.

There are so many people saying things that do not match the official story and individually they might be dismissed on superficial grounds, but they are never addressed in combination.

Yeah, so many people who say things that don't match with what others say or with things that they themselves said years ago.

[Martin Weidmann]

Not when they've been authenticated six ways from Sunday.

Yeah, so many people who say things that don't match with what others say or with things that they themselves said years ago.

Not when they've been authenticated six ways from Sunday.

Who authenticated them?

Yeah, so many people who say things that don't match with what others say or with things that they themselves said years ago.

Amazing, isn't it. A simple case of a guy shooting from a building killing another guy in a car produces so many contradictions and questionable evidence.

[Tim Nickerson]

Not when they've been authenticated six ways from Sunday.

Who authenticated them?

John Ebersole, the Radiologist, and Jerrol Custer authenticated the X-Rays, As did Humes, Boswell, and the HSCA's 21 member panel of photographic analysis experts. The HSCA medical panel confirmed that the X-Rays were of Kennedy. John Stringer, the photographer, authenticated the photos. As did Humes, Boswell, and the HSCA's 21 member panel of photographic analysis experts.

[Martin Weidmann]

John Ebersole, the Radiologist, and Jerrol Custer authenticated the X-Rays, As did Humes, Boswell, and the HSCA's 21 member panel of photographic analysis experts. The HSCA medical panel confirmed that the X-Rays were of Kennedy. John Stringer, the photographer, authenticated the photos. As did Humes, Boswell, and the HSCA's 21 member panel of photographic analysis experts.

The only two people in your list who could possibly authenticate the X-Rays are Ebersole and Custer. I haven't checked Ebersole yet, but Custer did indeed authenticate some of the X-Rays but also expressed concern about some of them.
Humes and Boswell were not involved in the taking of the X-Rays and have to rely on authentication by the two men named.
John Stringer also was not involved in the taking of the X-Rays. In fact, when asked about him by the ARRB, Custer could not even remember him vividly.
The HSCA photograpic experts never saw Kennedy's body and had no way of knowing or verifying they were the X-Rays of Kennedy.

[Tim Nickerson]

The only two people in your list who could possibly authenticate the X-Rays are Ebersole and Custer. I haven't checked Ebersole yet, but Custer did indeed authenticate some of the X-Rays but also expressed concern about some of them.
Humes and Boswell were not involved in the taking of the X-Rays and have to rely on authentication by the two men named.
John Stringer also was not involved in the taking of the X-Rays. In fact, when asked about him by the ARRB, Custer could not even remember him vividly.
The HSCA photograpic experts never saw Kennedy's body and had no way of knowing or verifying they were the X-Rays of Kennedy.

I never said that the HSCA photographic experts verified that the X-Rays were of Kennedy. I said that it was the HSCA Medical panel that verified that the X-Rays were of Kennedy. They were able to do so with the aid of X-rays taken of Kennedy prior to the assassination and his dental records.

I never claimed that Stringer authenticated the X-Rays.

Humes' and Boswell's authentication was based on their own recollections of the autopsy that they performed as well as what in contained in their autopsy report. If you remove them from the list then you still have the 21 members of the HSCA's photographic analysis panel. That panel confirmed the authenticity of the X-Rays and the photos.

[Martin Weidmann]

I never said that the HSCA photographic experts verified that the X-Rays were of Kennedy. I said that it was the HSCA Medical panel that verified that the X-Rays were of Kennedy. They were able to do so with the aid of X-rays taken of Kennedy prior to the assassination and his dental records.

I never claimed that Stringer authenticated the X-Rays.

I stand corrected. I misread your post. My bad.

Humes' and Boswell's authentication was based on their own recollections of the autopsy that they performed as well as what in contained in their autopsy report. If you remove them from the list then you still have the 21 members of the HSCA's photographic analysis panel. That panel confirmed the authenticity of the X-Rays and the photos.

Now you've got me utterly confused.

Here you say;

you still have the 21 members of the HSCA's photographic analysis panel. That panel confirmed the authenticity of the X-Rays and the photos.

but earlier you said;

I never said that the HSCA photographic experts verified that the X-Rays were of Kennedy.

Could you please explain how you can confirm the authenticity of the X-Rays without verifying that the X-Rays were of Kennedy?

Earlier in this thread you said the X-Rays had "been authenticated six ways from Sunday."

It now turns out that you apparently were merely talking about Ebersole and Custer and the recollections of Humes and Boswell. So, you've two men, who actually conducted the most questionable autopsy in history, and who are never going to say anything but what you would expect from them and two men that actually took the X-Rays and even one of those (and I still haven't checked Ebersol) had some doubts about some of the X-Rays.

Oh well, at least now we know what you mean by "six ways from Sunday"