Geneva Hine

[John Iacoletti]

Exactly and what are the odds that one out of "not very many people" was Lee Harvey Oswald;
the same guy who defected to the enemy,
the same guy who shot himself in the elbow while in the marines
the same guy who slashed his wrists when denied entry to the enemy.
the same guy who attempted to kill General Walker,
the same guy who purchased the same rifle found on the 6th floor.
the same guy who was described reasonably accurately by Brennan.
the same gut who had a shirt which contained 3 different types of fibers which matched the fibers found on the rifle.
the same guy who left prints on the box which was a seat and the recently moved rifle rest box. Btw the fingerprints Latona says "undoubtedly this print was left on there----between the time that the print was left and the time that it was powdered could not have been too long a time. Otherwise, the print would not have developed with the clarity that it did." Latona WC Testimony.
the same guy who is in immediate flight and leaves the building within a few minutes.
the same guy who get's on and off a bus then catches a cab.
the same guy who gets out past his rooming house.
the same guy who hurry's into his room and tells Police he grabbed his gun.
the same guy seen zipping up a jacket as he leaves the rooming house.
the same guy who is seen killing Tippit.
the same guy who was positively identified by a plethora of eyewitnesses at or moving away from the Tippit crime scene
the same guy is identified wearing a light coloured jacket.
the same guy is identified emptying shells as he was moving away.
the same guy whose revolver exclusively matched the shells at the seen.
the same guy who discards his jacket.
the same guy who suspiciously enters a dark theater.
the same guy who pops a cop on the nose when approached.
the same guy who pulls out the same revolver and tries to kill even more cops.
the same guy who lies about the backyard photo.
the same guy who lied about living at Neeley street
the same guy who lied about the rifle ownership.
the same guy who told different stories about the rifle bag contents
the same guy who told different stories about where he placed the rifle bag.
the same guy who left his wedding ring symbolically in Marina's family heirloom.
the same guy who left nearly all his money with Marina.
etc etc

Cool story, bro. Too bad you can’t prove any of this fantasy.

[John Iacoletti]

You cared enough to mention Mooney in a previous post. LOL!

Yep, and LN evangelists twist themselves into pretzels try to “explain” that away too.

[John Mytton]

Yep, and LN evangelists twist themselves into pretzels try to “explain” that away too.

Yes Iacoletti, some guy for absolutely no reason at all was mysteriously plugging in and unplugging the power to the lights.



JohnM

[John Mytton]

Cool story, bro. Too bad you can’t prove any of this fantasy.

Cool story, bro.

It's not a story, it's history.

Too bad you can’t prove any of this fantasy.

LOL!

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Yes Iacoletti, some guy for absolutely no reason at all was mysteriously plugging in and unplugging the power to the lights.

Yes, “Mytton”. Your imaginary crystal ball is malfunctioning.

[John Iacoletti]

It's not a story, it's history.

“History”. LOL.

[Mitch Todd]

It’s not a change of subject. The “did any other witness say..” counterargument is fallacious.

Asserting that Hines meant that the building power went out creates a prediction, in a classic Karl Popper vein: everyone else in the building would have also seen the power go out. In turn, we should then expect at least one of these other unenlightened people to have spoken up about a the the remarkable coincidence of the lights mysteriously going out at a most interesting time. Dodging the issue trying to assert a non-existent fallacy isn't going to help you with anything other than looking like an ever bigger dork, kid.

We’re talking about what Hine said.

I'm talking about what happened, what Hines meant being the point of contention. I'm not sure what you think you're talking about at this point. Increasingly, your aim seems to be wasting everyone's time. Including your own.

You act like you not only can read her mind retroactively, but you also know what her phone looked like.

Again, I know what multi-line phones were like back in the analog Jurassic. You got what AT&T gave you and every business that had multiple lines, but didn't have it's own private branch/switchboard, had phones that looked like the earlier photo. Getting mad about this is like getting mad when I say that Geneva Hine's car had a steering wheel.

And I don't need to read her mind. I only need to read testimony. The sentence that associates the lights going out with calls falling off. The sentence that notes that the phones started "winking" when calls began to come back in. The lack of any expression of surprise of suspicion that the power would go out at that point. The lack of anyone else's testifying that they also experienced a power outage. The knowledge of 1960's multiline telephony.