JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Uninterrupted TSBD rooftop Hertz sign time display = no power failure
John Mytton:
--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on March 07, 2018, 09:57:44 PM ---Walt has narratives too.
--- End quote ---
And Iacoletti seems to have no narrative and the reason for that is staring you right in the face, you have no alternative because none exists.
--- Quote ---Isn't story time fun?
--- End quote ---
A mountain of evidence corroborates to one conclusion, it only happened one way.
JohnM
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: John Mytton on March 07, 2018, 10:25:41 PM ---And Iacoletti seems to have no narrative and the reason for that is staring you right in the face, you have no alternative because none exists.
--- End quote ---
"I win by default unless you can prove something different happened".
--- Quote ---A mountain of evidence corroborates to one conclusion, it only happened one way.
--- End quote ---
So you keep saying. Yeah, we know -- Oswald left his ring in a cup.
Michael O'Brian:
--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on March 07, 2018, 09:48:08 PM ---
I've made my position very clear. You arrogantly claimed that there was never a power outage because the Hertz sign worked at
12:30. I said that Mooney and Adams both reported power outages to elevators, and Hine reported lights going out. Period. You're the one who has to weave fantasy conspirators into every conversation.
--- End quote ---
Obvious power outages going on in the building, this in itself is very serious evidence of a conspiracy and the accused mans innocence
Richard Smith:
--- Quote from: Michael O'Brian on March 07, 2018, 11:46:14 PM ---Obvious power outages going on in the building, this in itself is very serious evidence of a conspiracy and the accused mans innocence
--- End quote ---
John has asked multiple times now who has alleged the power outage is evidence of a conspiracy. Implying no one has done so despite numerous examples to the contrary. So just want to highlight yet another example should anyone be taken in by yet another of his dishonest claims.
Richard Smith:
--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on March 06, 2018, 09:24:17 PM ---I didn't dishonestly do anything. I quoted Tom's post in a reply. He's more credible than you because he does actual research. All you do is insult people and make up strawman arguments.
--- End quote ---
Another lie. You quoted language Tom wrote but indicated it came from the newspaper article that he posted and was therefore conclusive in resolving the issue of the power source of the sign. When I asked specifically about the language you placed quotation marks around in relation to the article you doubled down. It wasn't until after I pointed out to you that Tom's commentary about the "separate power" source was his own assessment and not a fact noted in the article that you started running away. How exactly is Tom's research more "credible" in this respect? He offered his opinion about the sign's power source. It was not confirmed by any facts in the article. He may or may not be right but I don't see how his opinion is more credible than other plausible alternatives except that his opinion is one that you hope is correct.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version