Final Conclusion*

[Bill Chapman]

Does leaving a wedding ring makes him guilty!? Absolutely not.
_Agreed

In the mind of a die hard LN it most certainly does..... They are so obsessed with Oswald being a lone nut shooter, that him leaving a light on is for them conclusive evidence of guilt
_Leaving all his money AND wedding ring behind was strange
_Eliminate one of those and fewer LN eyebrows will be raised

[Dan O'meara]

Does leaving a wedding ring makes him guilty!? Absolutely not.
_Agreed

In the mind of a die hard LN it most certainly does..... They are so obsessed with Oswald being a lone nut shooter, that him leaving a light on is for them conclusive evidence of guilt
_Leaving all his money AND wedding ring behind was strange
_Eliminate one of those and fewer LN eyebrows will be raised

And let's not forget, Oswald did something similar when he missed sitting duck Walker.

[Bill Chapman]

And let's not forget, Oswald did something similar when he missed sitting duck Walker.

A little different than paper

[Patrick Jackson]

Does leaving a wedding ring makes him guilty!? Absolutely not.

In the mind of a die hard LN it most certainly does..... They are so obsessed with Oswald being a lone nut shooter, that him leaving a light on is for them conclusive evidence of guilt

Among all the people at Dealey Plaza at 12:30PM, Oswald was probably the only one person of interest due to his life in USSR. If you would line them all together, you would only pick him for further interrogation. He was aware of this and he run away even he had nothing to do with it.
OK, he left the ring and the money, probably expecting he will be apprehended and questioned.
Still, you come to a gun question, why did he take the gun? He was in a great fear and could not think clearly.
All in all, when you take everything into the consideration, it is very hard to accept he did it as a LN.

[Richard Smith]

Does leaving a wedding ring makes him guilty!? Absolutely not.

In the mind of a die hard LN it most certainly does..... They are so obsessed with Oswald being a lone nut shooter, that him leaving a light on is for them conclusive evidence of guilt

Talk about a strawman.  No LNer in history has ever suggested that the fact that Oswald left his wedding ring at home that morning "makes him guilty."  LOL.  Rather, in the context of the totality of circumstances and evidence that links Oswald to this crime, it is just another brick in the wall of his guilt.  For the first and only time of his marriage according to Marina, Oswald left his wedding ring at home that morning after an unscheduled visit to the Paine home (where he also kept his rifle).   The same day he would be arrested for the assassination of JFK.  What a coincidence.  Tell us again how you are impartial and not a CTer.  Whew.

[Steve M. Galbraith]

Talk about a strawman.  No LNer in history has ever suggested that the fact that Oswald left his wedding ring at home that morning "makes him guilty."  LOL.  Rather, in the context of the totality of circumstances and evidence that links Oswald to this crime, it is just another brick in the wall of his guilt.  For the first and only time of his marriage according to Marina, Oswald left his wedding ring at home that morning after an unscheduled visit to the Paine home (where he also kept his rifle).   The same day he would be arrested for the assassination of JFK.  What a coincidence.  Tell us again how you are impartial and not a CTer.  Whew.

It's interesting (but not really) that Mr. "I challenge all claims equally and it's a lie to say otherwise" is completely silent about challenging Patrick Jackson's conspiracy claims. No, he makes a claim up about the wedding ring. No lone assassin believer has said what he claims. It's not just a strawman it's an invisible man. It's nowhere to be seen.

There are about a dozen posts/threads here - the Stone movie, another conspiracy book, et cetera - making conspiracy arguments. And Mr. "I challenge all claims equally" has posted zero times at any of those challenging those allegations.

I do agree with him on one thing, though. Somebody in this exchange with him is making things up. They certainly are.

[Martin Weidmann]

Talk about a strawman.  No LNer in history has ever suggested that the fact that Oswald left his wedding ring at home that morning "makes him guilty."  LOL.  Rather, in the context of the totality of circumstances and evidence that links Oswald to this crime, it is just another brick in the wall of his guilt.  For the first and only time of his marriage according to Marina, Oswald left his wedding ring at home that morning after an unscheduled visit to the Paine home (where he also kept his rifle).   The same day he would be arrested for the assassination of JFK.  What a coincidence.  Tell us again how you are impartial and not a CTer.  Whew.

Talk about a strawman.

So, you don't know what a strawman actually is.... that explains a lot