3 shooters instead of 1?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: 3 shooters instead of 1?  (Read 14076 times)

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: 3 shooters instead of 1?
« Reply #21 on: September 19, 2021, 10:39:40 PM »

I'm unaware of any evidence suggesting that silencers were used.
What kind of evidence would there be?

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: 3 shooters instead of 1?
« Reply #22 on: September 19, 2021, 10:42:30 PM »
Silencers, disintegrating bullets, cloak of invisibility.......  This is getting more outlandish than a James Bond story.  You can't really believe that nonsense. And all they had to do was use the same rifle that they had taken great pains to link to Oswald and fire from it from the same location that they set up to frame him from.  But instead it is like the shootout at the O.K. Corral.
The only nonsense around here are your posts.

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
Re: 3 shooters instead of 1?
« Reply #23 on: September 20, 2021, 02:10:07 AM »
The only nonsense around here are your posts.

Nice rebuttal.  So full of substantive arguments and logic to advance the discussion.  I point out that if conspirators spent considerable time and effort to connect Oswald to a specific rifle and shooting location, they would assassinate JFK with a different rifle fired from a different shooting location, and you knock it all down with this fantastic post.