Michael Griffith and other conspiracy fantasists (yes, there are sensible ones) rejected the Itek study, the Myers recreation of the shooting, the analysis of the Zapruder film, the backyard photos and the x-rays. All were dismissed as meaningless and worthless.
Now he's lecturing people on believing the "science"?
Mr. Griffith believes that Clay Shaw, David Ferrie and Oswald conspired to assassinate the president. They came up with the plan at a gathering while complete strangers (!?) listened to them. They then took that plan to the CIA who carried it out. Yes they did. The plan that was overheard by strangers. However he also believes in John Newman's work. Newman says the Pentagon, chiefly Lemnitzer and Lansdale, was behind the assassination but not the CIA. But Mr. Griffith said he believes the Garrison claim about the CIA. So which is it? The CIA or military? Does he know the difference? He also believes, as I mentioned above, that the Zapruder film was faked, the backyard photos faked, the x-rays faked and that all of this fakery and more has been covered up. He says that "disinformation agents" from the government, apparently the CIA but who knows?, are actively covering up what happened. Right now. On the internet. And in the media. Yes, he believes all of this. And more..
So how many people does he say did all of this? Faked all of this? Including those today, the disinformation agents? He says, "About twenty to thirty."
And one more: He says Sirhan Sirhan was "hypno-programmed" (whatever that is) to shoot RFK.
If the phrase "crackpot beliefs" comes to mind then welcome to the club.