Why are the CT's so obsessed with disproving the innocent Bus and Cab rides?

[Martin Weidmann]

And you have been here two minutes and you still have mommies milk on your lips, when you have as much experience as me then you can be taken seriously but until then you are just an annoying child who has much to learn.

JohnM

when you have as much experience as me then you can be taken seriously

Hilarious. So much delusions of grandeur from a mere agenda driven propagandist. Gotta love it 

[John Mytton]

And I'm absolutely sure that you're not so stupid that you don't know what I'm trying to achieve...  I'm presenting evidence that shows that Bill Whaley's tale of transporting Lee Oswald to Oak Cliff is nothing but pure unadulterated BS.

Ok ok ok, we get it you don't believe Whaley took Oswald from "A" to "B" and you think Oswald took another cab from "A" to "B", now what?

JohnM

[John Mytton]

Round and round we go and now at way over 200 posts, we have 1 CT Walt giving a lame ass excuse for doubting the official version with another equally innocent explanation? So far not one CT can come up with an alternative narrative much less an alternative that proves Oswald's "innocence", so I gotta ask what are the CT's trying to accomplish here with what you must all know only amounts to worthless go nowhere arguments because it's obvious that not one of you has any interest in solving your "conspiratorial" crime and mistakenly think that creating doubt for the sake of chaos is the answer, but the answer to what?

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Round and round we go and now at way over 200 posts, we have 1 CT Walt giving a lame ass excuse for doubting the official version with another equally innocent explanation? So far not one CT can come up with an alternative narrative much less an alternative that proves Oswald's "innocence", so I gotta ask what are the CT's trying to accomplish here with what you must all know only amounts to worthless go nowhere arguments because it's obvious that not one of you has any interest in solving your "conspiratorial" crime and mistakenly think that creating doubt for the sake of chaos is the answer, but the answer to what?

JohnM

So far not one CT can come up with an alternative narrative much less an alternative that proves Oswald's "innocence"

Since when does somebody's innocence needs to proven? The last time I looked the onus was and is on the prosecution to prove somebody guilty. But thank your for exposing your Salem like "guilty unless prove innocent" mindset

[Alan Ford]

Wow, so much unproven conjecture and all without even a scintilla of evidence to support this ever increasing level of paranoia, and when you have no answers to what is in fact my "supah-dupah" arguments of evidence that only Whaley exclusively knew that wasn't in the public domain, you suddenly shift the goalposts and now you're reduced to this new level of absurd arrogance that all the inconvenient witnesses lied and all the problematic evidence was manufactured, go away and try and convince someone/anyone of your unsubstantiated ideas and let's see how far that gets you.

Let's translate: The suggestion that the investigating authorities would lie about what LHO said in interrogation can be safely dismissed on the basis that it would require the investigating authorities to lie about what LHO said in interrogation. Wow, a real knockdown argument you got there, Mr Mytton! 

What a pathetic attempt to score points, I was the one who first EDITED my previous post and directed you to the EDITED post and I was the one who first posted the non Dallas newspaper and all the newspaper's thereafter and I was the one who first admitted that Whaley could have gained information from the newspaper article, that is if the same info was published in Dallas and when the tables were turned and I posted non public domain evidence that only Whaley and Oswald knew, you alter the rules and make endless unprovable paranoid claims in a weak attempt to defend your untenable position.

Nope, you made an ill-considered claim about Mr Whaley's supah-dupah-details about Mr Oswald's appearance and, since realizing your goof, have been pretending to be doing something other than kicking yourself for it! 

[Alan Ford]

Perhaps Whaley did see an ID bracelet on the wrist of his passenger who was wearing a BLUE JACKET and BLUE trousers.
ID Bracelets were very common ......  a large percentage of young men wore them....


But the Fact remains Lee Oswald could not have been Whaley's passenger because Lee was wearing a reddish brown shirt with a BUTTON DOWN COLLAR and he was NOT wearing a BLUE JACKET.

Yep, Mr Whaley described the arrest shirt in his affidavit----------------and, to make matters worse, could only (at this early point) describe it as "dark" (no color given). Interesting!

[Alan Ford]

Friends, common sense tells us that the answer to the question 'Why would the authorities go to the trouble of inventing a bus ride, and then a bus and cab ride, for Mr Oswald?' must lie in the answer to another question: 'What did Mr Oswald himself tell Captain Fritz, in that first interrogation session, about how he traveled?' For, if there was something in that answer from Mr Oswald that made the 'investigating' authorities deeply uncomfortable, then we have our motive for deception on the part of the 'investigating' authorities.

After all, these guys went to great efforts to bury Mr Oswald's claim to have visited the second-floor lunchroom for a coke BEFORE the P. Parade and then gone outside to watch the P. Parade. So it's no stretch at all that they would engage in similar shenanigans on this other phase of the 'investigation'.