Is this possible?

[Bill Chapman]

I read your whiny thread, didn't see a [question]. I just saw a bitter rant about someone getting more attention than you.

The question is can a massive Oswald arse-kisser like JD be considered an authority on the JFK assassination.

[Jon Banks]

He is a walking encyclopedia on the JFK case.

 Fred

I agree.

I disagree with his support of Jim Garrison but outside of that, it's undeniable that Jim Di knows his stuff.

[Richard Smith]

The question is can a massive Oswald arse-kisser like JD be considered an authority on the JFK assassination.

There are plenty of JFK CTers who are extremely well informed.  In fact, the accumulation of information seems to be part of the psychological make up of many CTers.  It's as though they are overwhelmed by detail and come to believe it all must "mean something."  What they lack is the ability to translate information into knowledge. 

[Walt Cakebread]

There are plenty of JFK CTers who are extremely well informed.  In fact, the accumulation of information seems to be part of the psychological make up of many CTers.  It's as though they are overwhelmed by detail and come to believe it all must "mean something."  What they lack is the ability to translate information into knowledge.

Gibberish!!

[Richard Smith]

Gibberish!!

Well ok, maybe not every CTer is "well informed."  There are notable exceptions.

[Jon Banks]

There are plenty of JFK CTers who are extremely well informed.  In fact, the accumulation of information seems to be part of the psychological make up of many CTers.  It's as though they are overwhelmed by detail and come to believe it all must "mean something."  What they lack is the ability to translate information into knowledge.

That makes no sense.

Why can't you just accept that two individuals can view the same evidence and reach different conclusions?

[Walt Cakebread]

That makes no sense.

Why can't you just accept that two individuals can view the same evidence and reach different conclusions?

 two individuals can view the same evidence and reach different conclusions?

Is the glass half full or half empty...... 

Of course when each piece of evidence is scrutinized then one of the individuals will prevail .....

If we use just the carcano as a single piece of evidence......  and ask: What evidence supports the contention that it was the murder weapon?  And what evidence refutes the contention that it was the murder weapon.?   

Of course both persons must be totally candid, and honest  ......   Where would two such persons be found?     I'd suggest a place where the two people would have no previous information and no interest or agenda......    IOW.....  An inhuman and emotionless computer.... 

Alexa.....Is it possible to fire a rifle accurately if the telescopic site is mounted out of alignment with the barrel?

Alexa:..... No, the scope must be accurately aligned with the bore of the barrel.....   Next question please.....