Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?

[Robert Reeves]

The cotton seems to have work loose as pictures of Wise, the policeman in the lead, taken on Houston show nothing projecting from his ear.

An easy to make error on your part. The cop now in front, in the lead, is actually Billy Bass (in this particular photo you've posted). Who was at the rear in the first picture, the picture showing Wise with the strange earpiece. See, they've changed a bit, Marvin Wise has gone from the frame. But nice try.

That's what you get when all you want to do is just debunk everything, for the sake of it.



Billy Bass has a whistle or something near the pistol on his right hip. And more details on his shirt on the right chest.

[Robert Reeves]

Also, just so you know, @Jerry Organ, Marvin Wise stated to FBI 03/06/92.

The prisoners he escorted that day were released, that day, not 2 or 3 days, as the Doyle tramp character stated. No the tramps Marvin Wise escorted were released THAT DAY, DAY OF THE ASSASSINATION.



Doyle's FBI interview in 1992, also.



The reason you are mixed up is because there were two groups of tramps arrested. The lot with cops Marvin Wise, Billy Bass, William Chambers, and a group of tramps arrested immediately after the assassination, which I believe were the tramps Harold Doyle, John Gedney, and Gus Abrams.

Harold Doyle stated there were arrested immediately after the assassination and walked past angry crowds. Well there are no crowds in the series of three tramps photos. 

[Richard Smith]

Imagine that CTers have gone over this case to the extent that an apparent cotton ball in the ear of a cop has become a topic but they still can't construct any plausible alternative narrative that explains away the evidence against Oswald. 

[Walt Cakebread]

Of all of these questions the two that are most striking to me are: "Why not plant witnesses in Dealey Plaza who say they saw Oswald shoot JFK?" and "Why not have Ruth Paine or Marina or Norman/Jarman/Williams more fully implicate Oswald in the shooting" Such as, he expressed hatred towards JFK, they saw him with a large package that morning, et cetera. Conspiracy believers say that there were all kinds of government agents or assets at the scene of the shooting. But none came forward and said they saw Oswald shoot from the window. Why not?

Hell, why not plant a note/letter from Oswald after Ruby shot him admitting guilt and giving his reasons, e.g., he hated the US, JFK was waging war on his hero Castro, et cetera? Oswald is dead. He can't refute it. One of the key points that Oswald defenders always raise is the question of motive. Well, here's the way to answer it.

If these powerful groups who were allegedly behind the assassination wanted to frame Oswald they could have done many more things to implicate him. But they didn't.

"Why not plant witnesses in Dealey Plaza who say they saw Oswald shoot JFK?"   

Answer .... Because Lee did not shoot JFK...... And if someone had swore they saw Lee shoot JFK and then someone like Marrion Baker ( for example) or some other person swore that he had seen LHO at a time when it made the witness statement obvious BS .....The police( if it had been a honest investigation)  would have called the witness and questioned  WHY they had reported something that they couldn't possibly have seen.....

You're not using your head......

The the number of people who knew of the plot to murder JFK had to be kept to a very small group.....The more people with knowledge of the plot, the greater the danger of the plot being discovered and foiled.   

[John Mytton]

"Why not plant witnesses in Dealey Plaza who say they saw Oswald shoot JFK?"   

Answer .... Because Lee did not shoot JFK...... And if someone had swore they saw Lee shoot JFK and then someone like Marrion Baker ( for example) or some other person swore that he had seen LHO at a time when it made the witness statement obvious BS .....The police( if it had been a honest investigation)  would have called the witness and questioned  WHY they had reported something that they couldn't possibly have seen.....

You're not using your head......

The the number of people who knew of the plot to murder JFK had to be kept to a very small group.....The more people with knowledge of the plot, the greater the danger of the plot being discovered and foiled.   

The the number of people who knew of the plot to murder JFK had to be kept to a very small group.....

Huh?, In practically every one of your thousands of posts you seem to implicate someone new, for instance just in the above post you are already suggesting the Police hadn't been honest, exactly who else besides the Dallas Police was responsible and why? And if there was even one group beyond the Dallas Police, wouldn't that make a conspiracy that wasn't very small?

JohnM

[Charles Collins]

I ask why no credible evidence of a conspiracy has been uncovered after all these years. And get treated to the absurd photo of what appears to be the outline of a flask of booze under the pants leg of one of the hobos! How paranoid do you have to be to believe that it looks like a walkie talkie? 

[Robert Reeves]

It's interesting how suddenly now the cop has bad memory. Marvin Wise confirmed in his FBI statement the three tramps he escorted from the railtracks were released ... it appears ... IMMEDIATELY upon being taken in. No questioning, just released.