JFK Revisited currently has a Rotten Tomato score of 55%

[Michael T. Griffith]

So a bunch of establishment media outlets have panned the documentary. Shocking! Say it ain't so. What a surprise. By the way, on IMDB, the documentary has a rating of 7.9 out of 10, but of course you went and cherry picked only the negative reviews.

The documentary is actually quite good. It's a huge improvement over the movie JFK.

[John Mytton]

So a bunch of establishment media outlets have panned the documentary. Shocking! Say it ain't so. What a surprise. By the way, on IMDB, the documentary has a rating of 7.9 out of 10, but of course you went and cherry picked only the negative reviews.

The documentary is actually quite good. It's a huge improvement over the movie JFK.

So a bunch of establishment media outlets have panned the documentary. Shocking! Say it ain't so. What a surprise

That pesky "establishment", more than half a century later and still trying to keep the man down. 

By the way, on IMDB, the documentary has a rating of 7.9 out of 10, but of course you went and cherry picked only the negative reviews

Oh yes, user reviews are oh so reliable, let's have a closer look at the distribution of user scores and as I predicted clearly a lot of old paranoid "scholars" have review bombed this film but simply in reverse! Hilarious. Thanks for the laughs Griff, I hope you stick around and share more of your pearls of wisdom.



JohnM

[Jon Banks]

So a bunch of establishment media outlets have panned the documentary. Shocking! Say it ain't so. What a surprise. By the way, on IMDB, the documentary has a rating of 7.9 out of 10, but of course you went and cherry picked only the negative reviews.

The documentary is actually quite good. It's a huge improvement over the movie JFK.

That's good to hear. I'm looking forward to watching it.

[Robert Reeves]

Am I missing something, how are people reviewing JFK Revisited ... I am unable to even find any streaming service, etc, that is showing it. I'm in UK, is this available in USA yet?

[Jerry Freeman]

McCloy should not be in this group. There is no place for the bullet exiting JFK's throat to go but into JBC's back. McCloy also states this very point.  Mr. McCLOY  - Warren Commission Member to the HSCA about SBT...........
Frankly, I don't think he knew exactly when he was hit. I saw his recent testimony-- at least somebody reported to me, perhaps indirectly, that he wasn't as certain now as when he first appeared before us [Really? So who was that un-named indirect somebody?] --before our Commission when I don't know where that bullet could have gone if it didn't go through Governor Connally.... he said he was sure it wasn't the same shot which hit President Kennedy which hit him.

John Connally was absolutely "sure" about his being wounded--- but the Commission group would not accept this unrestricted certainty--- obviously because it did not fit the 6th window only account. Shabby and downright pathetic!

Truth A lone gunman narrative is our only client.

The Warren Report stated: "There was no question in the mind of any member of the Commission that all the shots which caused the President's and Governor Connally's wounds were fired from the sixth floor window of the Texas School Book Depository." This is something at that time that all members agreed to. Yet, Freeman, whose motto is "I am not a 'CT'", wants (showing his bias) to have most of the Commissioners be CTs.

The whole purpose of the Commission was leave no question. So why all the questions to this day? Where did I say "I want to have" anything. I just quoted *wikipedia is all. Skepticism is not bias but Organ is quite obviously bias. Show where I advanced any conspiracy theory. I just shamelessly question the official theory.   
*

Skepticism--- Four of the seven members of the commission, Boggs, Cooper, McCloy, and Russell, had serious doubts regarding the conclusions of the commission that the President and Governor Connally were both wounded by the "magic bullet" and regarding the view that Oswald had acted alone.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Commission#Skepticism
Just click the link

[Jon Banks]

The trailer looks great. Surprised this hasn't been picked up yet by any of the major streaming services. Sounds like Whoopi Goldberg is the narrator.

[Walt Cakebread]

Because CTs and the so-called "skeptics" (LOL!) lack the investigative training of the Commission staff and federal/state police agencies and labs. The anti-vaccine and Climate Change deniers don't understand science and think the government and scientists are lying to them.

    "The majority of the very Commission itself "had serious doubts" regarding their
     own conclusions!! So, would that not have made [by definition established here
     on this forum by the anti-skeptics] these gentlemen 'conspiracy theorists'?"

To which I responded: "Yet, Freeman, whose motto is "I am not a 'CT'", wants (showing his bias) to have most of the Commissioners be CTs."

Nah, you're a Conspiracy Theorist, no matter how you dress it up. LNers are like the WC staff: Truth is our only client.

This will be distressing to you Mr O....   But I've noticed that the CT contingent is starting to sing in harmony.   For nearly 60 years the Ct's have been a discordant bunch..... They recognized that the WR was a pile of BS....but they couldn't agree on an alternative to the WR.     Primarily because most of them simply could not accept that "Good ol Unca Sam" was no better than a pimp dictator in some banana state .    They all wanted to find an evil boogie man like the Mafia, or the commies,  to hang the blame on.  Now that we've seen the corrupt politicians stealing elections and billions of our tax dollars, I perceive the citizens are starting to awake.   They are now willing to accept that the murder of President Kennedy was nothing but an old fashioned coup d e'tat....