Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald  (Read 17625 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #72 on: July 20, 2021, 09:33:51 PM »
Advertisement
Your prediction and my reply are both on record for everyone to check.

Result: Chapman FAILS.

As for your arse-kisser obsession: I would advise everyone around you to watch their back.

Your prediction and my reply are both on record for everyone to check.
What prediction and what record. Cite or #FAIL#OBOT

As for your arse-kisser obsession: I would advise everyone around you to watch their back.
You lot are the ones puckering up. Back, etc? Sorry, not on my bucket list, LowT.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #72 on: July 20, 2021, 09:33:51 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #73 on: July 20, 2021, 09:50:59 PM »
Never heard of it, why would anyone even care?

You really don't know what a spoof is do you.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #74 on: July 20, 2021, 10:07:26 PM »
Yes, that makes sense. The wood stock/end of the rifle would stick out from the paper or not be completely covered by it. And it's why he made a new bag to completely cover it when he took it to work. The paper he was using exposed part of the rifle.

It also makes sense that he would wrap it in paper to protect any oil from leaking onto the blanket and floor and also prevent fibers from the blanket potentially clogging up firing mechanism/getting stuck.

In any case, the paper explanation certainly could explain the lack of fibers on it.

"the paper explanation certainly could explain the lack of fibers on it.".....

Yes, it would.....Now please present solid physical evidence that the rifle was wrapped in paper before placing it in the blanket at New Orleans...And if it had been wrapped in paper as you hypothesize, How did Marina see the wooden stock of a rifle in the blanket?? ..and what happened to the paper wrapping?   Was the paper found in the garage?



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #74 on: July 20, 2021, 10:07:26 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #75 on: July 20, 2021, 10:11:55 PM »
What made me laugh SO hard was that you started out "It makes sense".

Everybody who has read your posts (any of them) knows what's coming!

No disappoint this time either: Oswald's best, and (now) only friend is left on the garage floor to get kicked around....(cough)

Doesn't this count as a rant?

What made me laugh SO hard was that you started out "It makes sense".
It does

Everybody who has read your posts (any of them) knows what's coming!
Keeps 'em coming back

No disappoint this time either: Oswald's best, and (now) only friend is left on the garage floor to get kicked around....(cough)
The Marines did the indoctrination there. Not my bad if one of their robots lost a few screws. And you should try to quit smoking

Doesn't this count as a rant?
More of a heads up


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #76 on: July 20, 2021, 10:38:32 PM »
Why would anyone care whether it was or wasn't?

Stop dodging the fact that you don't know a spoof—or are being mocked, for that matter—when you see one. Watch me post a spoof from The Onion for instance, and see your fellow fringers take it seriously.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #76 on: July 20, 2021, 10:38:32 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #77 on: July 20, 2021, 10:51:58 PM »
Why would anyone care whether it was or wasn't?

You tell me: Plenty of people wanted me kicked off the forum for posting spoofs, weakly claiming that they were distracting them (so don't read them, said I) and that I was here to somehow sabotage the entire forum haha. Talk about striking fear into Oswald zealots! What's the matter with you characters!

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #78 on: July 20, 2021, 11:07:28 PM »
Stop dodging the fact that you don't know a spoof

Coming from you, why would anyone care?

or are being mocked, for that matter

Coming from you, why would anyone care?

Watch me post a spoof from The Onion for instance, and see your fellow fringers take it seriously.


If only you knew your onions.

Coming from you, why would anyone care?
You tell me: You tell me: Plenty of people wanted me kicked off the forum for posting spoofs, weakly claiming that they were distracting them (so don't read them, said I) and that I was here to somehow sabotage the entire forum haha. Talk about striking fear into Oswald zealots! What's the matter with you characters!

If only you knew your onions
I know enough:
1) Oswald was seen shooting Tippit
2) Oswald #owns#Ulot
« Last Edit: July 20, 2021, 11:08:36 PM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #78 on: July 20, 2021, 11:07:28 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #79 on: July 20, 2021, 11:12:16 PM »
Chapman on the run, sweet.

"The blanket is very well worn. Most of the nap has been worn off of it. It has had a lot of use, and much of the original composition has been worn off " Paul Stombaugh


Now,

Mr. EISENBERG. Mr. Stombaugh, did you examine this blanket to determine whether any debris was present?
Mr. STOMBAUGH. Yes; I did. I scraped the blanket and removed all the foreign textile fibers and hairs and placed them into a pillbox.

and

Mr. EISENBERG. And what type of debris did you find, Mr. Stombaugh?
Mr. STOMBAUGH. I found numerous foreign textile fibers of various types and colors, as well as a number of limb and pubic hairs.

Which shows there was plenty of stuff on the blanket even though it was worn.

"One would need a brand new blanket to get a good quantitative analysis." Paul Stombaugh

This quote is entirely related to the true distribution of blanket fibers.

Did you really think you could get away with misrepresenting evidence to support your fantasy?

LN congregation bankruptcy for everyone to enjoy!

No blanket fibers stuck to the rifle. How does that misrepresent anything?