Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald  (Read 60629 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #28 on: July 18, 2021, 09:08:22 PM »
Simple solution..... Simpletons revel in simple solutions.

So you're calling Oswald a simpleton. Got it.
hahahahaha

Ozzy got his gun/Hauled it to work FridayAM/Poked it out the window FridayPM/Snuffed the sitting duck/cooked his goose/ate his lunch.

Still too complicated for ya?
Here, I designed this for age 5 reading-comprehension-level.
(In other words, Oswald apologists)

THE LITTLE TWERP THAT COULD
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2444.msg80740.html#msg80740

--------------------
The Oswald Porch
--------------------
Click-Click
'I think I can, I think I can'
Click-Click
'I think I can, I think I can'
Click-Click
'I think I can, I think I can'

--------------------
The Cuckoo's Nest
--------------------
BOOM>Click-Click
'I thought I could, I thought I could'
BOOM>Click-Click
'I thought I could, I thought I could'
BOOM>Click-Click
'I thought I could, I thought I could'

'The Little Engine That Could'
« Last Edit: July 19, 2021, 12:11:39 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #29 on: July 18, 2021, 11:37:32 PM »
Gun in blanket: no supporting evidence.

Gun in bag: no supporting evidence.

Wanna try again?

"Gun in blanket: no supporting evidence."

The FBI Lab found not a single fiber from the blanket on the carcano.....   How's that possible if the rifle had been wrapped in that blanket in New Orleans and transported from N O to Dallas and stored in Mike Paine's garage for two montha. ???     C'mon Lil Chappie answer the question.....


"Gun in bag: no supporting evidence."

The FBI lab reported that they found a SINGLE (ONE) blanket fiber on the paper bag, and there was not a trace of gun oil or any other indication that the carcano had ever been ib that paper sack that was too small to contain the rifle.   How do you explain that , lil Chappie?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #30 on: July 18, 2021, 11:42:18 PM »
Gun in blanket: no supporting evidence.

Gun in bag: no supporting evidence.

Wanna try again?

Beck in purgatory
Can't get respect

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #31 on: July 18, 2021, 11:55:28 PM »
"Gun in blanket: no supporting evidence."

The FBI Lab found not a single fiber from the blanket on the carcano.....   How's that possible if the rifle had been wrapped in that blanket in New Orleans and transported from N O to Dallas and stored in Mike Paine's garage for two montha. ???     C'mon Lil Chappie answer the question.....


"Gun in bag: no supporting evidence."

The FBI lab reported that they found a SINGLE (ONE) blanket fiber on the paper bag, and there was not a trace of gun oil or any other indication that the carcano had ever been ib that paper sack that was too small to contain the rifle.   How do you explain that , lil Chappie?

You need to read my books:
!) IF HE DID IT
2) OKAY, OKAY, HE DID IT ALREADY
« Last Edit: July 19, 2021, 12:05:36 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #32 on: July 19, 2021, 01:42:16 AM »
Li'l Lee lovingly wrapped the gun so nothing would snag.

If plenty of fibers were found, you would say they were planted.

What makes you think there would be fresh oil on a stored rifle? Is there some law?

What about the weird indents on the paper bag? The shapes near the midpoint of the bag where the trigger-guard and bolt would have been.





"If plenty of fibers were found, you would say they were planted."

B.S.!!! I'm not an Lner.....  I accept the facts and the physical evidence.....   Unlike a gutless LNer who's mantra is denial.....

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #33 on: July 19, 2021, 02:44:55 AM »
These delusions do not affect the evidence.

What is your problem?

Stop dodging. You called me a racist.
Now bugger off.

Online Vincent Baxter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #34 on: July 19, 2021, 03:13:29 AM »
"Gun in blanket: no supporting evidence."

The FBI Lab found not a single fiber from the blanket on the carcano.....   How's that possible if the rifle had been wrapped in that blanket in New Orleans and transported from N O to Dallas and stored in Mike Paine's garage for two montha. ???     C'mon Lil Chappie answer the question.....


"Gun in bag: no supporting evidence."

The FBI lab reported that they found a SINGLE (ONE) blanket fiber on the paper bag, and there was not a trace of gun oil or any other indication that the carcano had ever been ib that paper sack that was too small to contain the rifle.   How do you explain that , lil Chappie?

This would be the same FBI who have been accused of (or were in cohorts with) doctoring the backyard photos, planting the pristine CE399 bullet on the stretcher, confiscating and "losing" cameras and photos of the assassination, murdering witnesses, etc, etc, and basically doing all they can to cover up any conspiracy theories connected to the assassination?

It's funny how they were capable of doing all of the above but weren't capable of planting a few blanket fibres on a rifle.

What is even funnier is how you probably dismiss the FBI's conclusion on all of the aforementioned and the fact that they concluded that Oswald acted alone after undertaking more than 25000 interviews and tens of thousands of investigative leads, and yet you are so quick to take their word as gospel and use it as 100% reliable evidence on this matter when it suits your narrative of events.