What?, an unfair lineup?, no wonder Brennan was hesitant.
"Hesitant". LOL.
Brennan saw Oswald on television before he even went to the lineup where he didn't make a positive ID. That alone invalidated it.
Brennan's testimony under oath can only be an honest recollection.
Brennan's testimony under oath can only be an
honest recollection embellishment.
There, I fixed it for you.
The shooter was crouched behind boxes and hidden by bricks at the time Brennan saw him "taking aim" with a rifle, and yet he somehow estimated his height, weight, age, and clothing. Incorrectly, I might add, if it was Oswald.
Isn't it about 60% of the US population believe in a JFK conspiracy which makes a number of about 200,000,000 and it's safe to say that a fair percentage formed this opinion based on the "back and to the left" in Zapruder, so my original point is hardly an exaggeration.
And by "safe to say", you mean wild-ass guess. Clearly.
For a start my original post that you responded to said "reasonably clearly" and secondly there is a lot of misinterpretation in Zapruder but when you use the Zapruder film in addition to the physical evidence then everything becomes clear.
Physical evidence of what, though?