The KGB Impersonated Oswald in Mexico to Connect Castro to the Assassination

[Richard Smith]

I addressed it in a previous post.  KGB officers inside the CIA assassinated JFK and their chosen patsies in the assassination were anti-Castro Cuban exiles.

The KGB officers needed to connect the Soviet Union and Cuba to President Kennedy’s assassination so that LBJ would fear the possibility of a nuclear war and establish the Warren Commission with a “no conspiracy” mandate.

The Church Committee Report states, “For the first twenty-four hours after the assassination, the CIA’s attention focused primarily on Oswald’s September 27, 1963, visit to Mexico City.”

It also states that “on the morning of November 23,” CIA Director John McCone met with President Johnson and his National Security Advisor, McGeorge Bundy, to “brief them on the information CIA Headquarters had received from its Mexico City station,”  which means CIA Director John McCone immediately initiated the effort to implicate Khrushchev and Castro.

On following day, November 24, that McCone informed Johnson of the CIA’s “plans against Cuba,”  which included plans to assassinate Castro.

Then, after his official morning meeting with the President, McCone met with President Johnson “in his private residence” and suggested that he get “an early briefing on the Soviet long-range striking capability” and Soviet “air defense posture.”

The CIA continued to foster concerns about Castro and Khrushchev in the week following the assassination, and after the Warren Commission was established, the CIA began transitioning into a claim that “anti-Castro Cubans” assassinated President Kennedy.

The anti-Castro Cubans’ alleged motive was to blame Castro for the assassination and thus provoke a U.S. invasion of Cuba.

It’s all in my book. Click the link.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07V9JT65Y

That is possibly the dumbest explanation that I've ever heard.  So the KGB was behind the assassination and they wanted to blame it on anti-Castro Cubans?  And the way they did this was to frame a Marxist by having him visit the Cuban embassy?  HA HA HA.  Where to start?

[Anthony Frank]

The key part in the show - or one of them - for this question is the interview for the first time with the KGB agents who were working at the Embassy in Mexico City and who said they  met and talked to Oswald over two days. These were very serious men in a very serious occupation who were astonished at Oswald's behavior. Oswald was, according to them, acting erratic and unstable and at one point brings out a revolver and waves it around saying he needed it for protection from the "notorious FBI." Remarkable.

They all said that the man they met over two days, the man who behaved like this was, was Lee Oswald. It is simply inconceivable to me that an impostor trying to pull an impersonation off would act like this.

Is this proof? Could they have been wrong? Yes. But if we look at the other evidence - the other eyewitnesses, the physical evidence, the circumstantial - it all points to Lee Oswald being the man they met.

They weren’t “wrong.” They simply lied.

They met with the so-called “unidentified mystery man,” who was one of their KGB colleagues in the CIA.

The KGB officer impersonating Oswald spoke with a KGB officer named Kostikov, who “specialized in handling Soviet agents operating under deep cover in the United States,” which, of course, included KGB officers inside the CIA.

Kostikov was “believed to work for Department Thirteen of the First Chief Directorate of the KGB. It is the Department responsible for executive action, including sabotage and assassination.”

I have first-hand knowledge that Warren Commission Exhibit 237, the Mexico City “unidentified mystery man,” is a photograph of one of President Kennedy’s three assassins.

It’s all explained in my book.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07V9JT65Y

[Richard Smith]

Your illiteracy concerning "actual evidence" is actually "well documented", true cringe material!

Coming from you, "well documented" translates to "the WC said... " which, sooner rather than later, turns into "no substance" as witnessed in our latest "discussion" RE "Oswald's rifle" (BTW, thanks for taking the bait).

Wow, did you really hope to "start me off" using decade old stinking strawman bait?

Again, no substantive discussion.  All commentary and personal insults.  I tried.  Bye bye.

[Bill Chapman]

Again, no substantive discussion.  All commentary and personal insults.  I tried.  Bye bye.

Make that 'buh-bye'
You know, the sarcastic SNL version

[Bill Chapman]

Facts misinterpreted as personal insults, what's new?

Your bluff ("Oswald's rifle") was called and you jumped ship.

That's how your "well documented" "substantive discussions" have worked for years -- LOL

Buh-bye.

[Bill Chapman]

No worries.

Just enjoy sniping a Lone Nutter once in a while.

Richard popped his head out and.... BOOM!

More importantly:

JFK popped his head out
BOOM>Click-Click
BOOM>Click-Click
BOOM>Click-Click

Poor dumb president

[Steve M. Galbraith]

That is possibly the dumbest explanation that I've ever heard.  So the KGB was behind the assassination and they wanted to blame it on anti-Castro Cubans?  And the way they did this was to frame a Marxist by having him visit the Cuban embassy?  HA HA HA.  Where to start?

In LBJ's last interview as president - one that was withheld until his death - he said he "never believed" that Oswald acted along and that he suspected that Castro was behind the assassination. He apparently was more open at other times in saying that Castro retaliated against the Kennedys because he, Castro, learned of the assassination plots against him. The Kennedys, LBJ reportedly said, were running a "Damned Murder Inc."

And many LBJ aides lived long after the Soviet Union dissolved. Bill Moyers, LBJ's press secretary, is still alive. I would think that these aides would have revealed this information after the demise of the USSR. What's the worry? There's no USSR to wage war with. Besides, I would rely on Robert Caro's reporting on such matters and to my knowledge he's uncovered nothing remotely related to this theory.