DPD Tapes and a 6 Minute Discrepancy

[Bill Chapman]

(Boots-on-the-Ground)
Based on his latest performance, how about foot-in-mouth?

seems a reasonable percentage
Please clarify why this would be "resonable".

that would give the sworn witnesses a good deal of credibility.
Please clarify why your "reasonable percentage" would influence the credibility of a witness.

1) Go ahead, Sir Beckley: Continue to sit on your arse while Bill Brown legs it out, talking with people who were there; not stuck in the dead, cold text of conspiracy-monger books
2) Please clarify where I said "resonable"
3) Do the math

[Martin Weidmann]

1) Go ahead, Sir Beckley: Continue to sit on your arse while Bill Brown legs it out, talking with people who were there; not stuck in the dead, cold text of conspiracy-monger books
2) Please clarify where I said "resonable"
3) Do the math

1) Go ahead, Sir Beckley: Continue to sit on your arse while Bill Brown legs it out, talking with people who were there; not stuck in the dead, cold text of conspiracy-monger books

Coming from a guy who has never been to Dallas and yet still claims to know all sorts of stuff about this case, this is completely hilarious.

[John Iacoletti]

What you are saying is that Bowley's watch must be correct be cause it fits your timeline. That line of argument says more about your ego than it does about the accuracy of Bowley's watch. Sniping aside, you're really down to arguing that Bowley's watch must be correct because it fits your timeline ...

Pretty hollow coming from one of the guys who assumes the time checks on the dictabelt recordings must be correct because it fits your timeline.

When you actually look at the data in the transcripts and the recordings themselves, you'll find that that Bowles and Cason were correct when they said that the DPD kept the dispatcher clocks within a minute of each other.

When did Bowles say that?

Dan and I have already demonstrated that using the simulcast and semi-simulcast traffic just after the shooting demonstrate that the DPD clocks were within a minute of each other

Irrelevant, even if that was demonstrable.  Even if two clocks agree with each other that doesn't mean that either one is correct.

And you you need to account for the Dudley Hughes data as well.

What Dudley Hughes data?

[John Iacoletti]

How accurate was Markham's washateria clock? And when was the last time that you saw someone go to a washateria to set their watch?

When's the last time somebody set their watch to what time Dave Powers said months later that something happened?

If you want to push Mrs Higgins' story, please show us the video where a television announcer reads "1:06" pm off of a clock on air.

It's probably in the same box as the radio broadcast prior to 1:40 of a policeman having been shot in Oak Cliff.

I'm sure you're already aware of the Methodist ER nurse who told Earl Golz that the DOA discrepancy was due to the clock in the Methodist ER being off by 15 minutes.

You mean like one of those things you jeeringly referred to as something said "years after the fact" when you were talking about Bowles saying that the dispatcher time checks did not equate to real time?

[Bill Chapman]

Said he in an ad hom kinda way
You reap what you sow; especially you.

And you keep on not providing it or saying you don't need to provide it because it's not a court of law. You want to have your cake and eat it to.... Ain't gonna happen
No need to prove anything on my part. Or eat cake, for that matter:


Bill Chapman

Actually, no you don't know that. What you know is that some Parkland doctors were once taken into a room, where no camera or witness was allowed, and were shown photos that matched the wound they had seen. You can only believe that those photos were indeed those taken at the autopsy because there is no way you can know for sure.
Actually, I do know that you are assuming/suggesting that those doctors are liars.

ADDITIONALLY
https://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/novadocs.htm

'In 1988, Public Broadcasting's NOVA got permission to show the Parkland doctors the original autopsy photos and x-rays in the National Archives. They were allowed as much time as they wished to view the materials, and then their reactions were filmed.'

Really? Is this just denial or simply an outright lie?
Really? Are suggesting that I'm a liar?

And to you that means that they had a good enough look of this man running passed their front door. It would never ever tell you something might not be quite right with the line up, right?
To me that means the sisters gave a positive ID regarding Oswald and that you are suggesting they are liars

You're so forgiving.... He had identified Oswald in a line up a day earlier and Oswald's picture was all over the media by then and he still couldn't pick him out.... It's pathetic!
He picked it out; it made the final two. Now tell us that the photograph of Oswald was taken at the exact same angle as Scoggins saw him, and under the exact same lighting conditions present near Scoggins. And tell us that you are not suggesting, hinting or otherwise calling him an outright liar.


Edits 4:20-ish re Nova insert

[Bill Chapman]

1) Go ahead, Sir Beckley: Continue to sit on your arse while Bill Brown legs it out, talking with people who were there; not stuck in the dead, cold text of conspiracy-monger books

Coming from a guy who has never been to Dallas and yet still claims to know all sorts of stuff about this case, this is completely hilarious.

I got a fine virtual tour by Bill (boots-on-the-ground) Brown while others can only kneel.

[Bill Chapman]

1) Go ahead, Sir Beckley: Continue to sit on your arse while Bill Brown legs it out, talking with people who were there; not stuck in the dead, cold text of conspiracy-monger books

Coming from a guy who has never been to Dallas and yet still claims to know all sorts of stuff about this case, this is completely hilarious.

Oh, by the way... I've never been to Detroit but I know a lot about Gordie Howe.