Spot The Difference

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Spot The Difference  (Read 27407 times)

Offline Mark A. Oblazney

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: Spot The Difference
« Reply #14 on: May 03, 2021, 12:20:47 PM »
To gain the correct setup, you need to take all other photos into the consideration. And even when you compare it all, you will not be 100% sure what was the setup at 12:30PM.

Whatever the 'correct setup', Ozzie still shot Jack.  End of story.  It was his lucky day....... sigh+  but not for us.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8174
Re: Spot The Difference
« Reply #15 on: May 03, 2021, 12:48:06 PM »
Whatever the 'correct setup', Ozzie still shot Jack.  End of story.  It was his lucky day....... sigh+  but not for us.

Oh boy, Mark Oblazney said it happened that way so it must be true.
Time to close the forum

 :D

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
Re: Spot The Difference
« Reply #16 on: May 03, 2021, 02:38:58 PM »
Truly confirmed those boxes were in place due to the floor laying project on the 6th floor.  The only boxes out of place were those Rolling Reader boxes that Oswald moved as a gun rest.  The very ones that had his prints on them. 

None of this is in the testimony you quoted.

Yes, it does.  Truly confirms that the only cartons that didn't belong there were the Rolling Reader boxes.   If they are out of place, then the other boxes were, as he explained, properly in that location.  No one - Oswald or anyfantasy conspirator - could have moved all the boxes around that window unnoticed in an effort to construct the SN.  There were dozens on large boxes. It was already largely in place.  And Oswald just moved a few smaller boxes to construct the gun rest.

Representative FORD. The Rolling Reader boxes were not ordinarily in that southeast corner?
Mr. TRULY. No, sir. That was not the place for them. They were 40 feet or so away.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8174
Re: Spot The Difference
« Reply #17 on: May 03, 2021, 02:48:22 PM »
Yes, it does.  Truly confirms that the only cartons that didn't belong there were the Rolling Reader boxes.   If they are out of place, then the other boxes were, as he explained, properly in that location.  No one - Oswald or anyfantasy conspirator - could have moved all the boxes around that window unnoticed in an effort to construct the SN.  There were dozens on large boxes. It was already largely in place.  And Oswald just moved a few smaller boxes to construct the gun rest.

Representative FORD. The Rolling Reader boxes were not ordinarily in that southeast corner?
Mr. TRULY. No, sir. That was not the place for them. They were 40 feet or so away.

Amazing. You still don't understand that your conclusions about what Truly is saying is not evidence.


Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3774
Re: Spot The Difference
« Reply #18 on: May 03, 2021, 04:47:22 PM »
Whatever the 'correct setup', Ozzie still shot Jack.  End of story.  It was his lucky day....... sigh+  but not for us.

So having two completely different set-ups in evidence is ok with you?
You're satisfied with that?
It doesn't tell you something about the incompetent/corrupt nature of the investigation?


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Spot The Difference
« Reply #19 on: May 03, 2021, 05:53:33 PM »
Whatever the 'correct setup', Ozzie still shot Jack.  End of story.  It was his lucky day....... sigh+  but not for us.

It was a lucky day for conspiracy-authors everywhere. They got to line their pockets thanks to the Oswald-loving crowd, who in turn found something to live for, which in turn gives Oswald a real shot at being remembered for the next 10,000 9,942 years. Which in turn, down in Hell, keeps a permanent smirk on the little prick's face.

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
Re: Spot The Difference
« Reply #20 on: May 03, 2021, 05:59:39 PM »
So having two completely different set-ups in evidence is ok with you?
You're satisfied with that?
It doesn't tell you something about the incompetent/corrupt nature of the investigation?

Obviously, the crime scene analysis in Nov. '63 would be vastly different than today.  Is that ideal? No.  But that doesn't negate for a second, however, the basic evidence that links Oswald to this crime beyond doubt.  His rifle, his prints, his bullet casings, no alibi, flight from the crime scene, involvement in another murder less than an hour later.  It's a slam dunk.  If we never know exactly how Oswald arranged the boxes because the cops moved them around while searching for evidence, then so be it.  It means nothing in terms of Oswald's guilt. 
« Last Edit: May 03, 2021, 06:02:34 PM by Richard Smith »