Youtube Interview I Did, Tippit Case

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Youtube Interview I Did, Tippit Case  (Read 197134 times)

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: Youtube Interview I Did, Tippit Case
« Reply #77 on: April 29, 2021, 12:47:58 AM »
'Same difference' re the outcome.

Too bad all of this is going over your head, but it's not really a surprise

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Youtube Interview I Did, Tippit Case
« Reply #78 on: April 29, 2021, 03:22:16 AM »
Too bad all of this is going over your head, but it's not really a surprise

Too bad for you that Earlene was only half-blind.
« Last Edit: April 29, 2021, 11:49:39 AM by Bill Chapman »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: Youtube Interview I Did, Tippit Case
« Reply #79 on: April 29, 2021, 04:08:53 PM »
Too bad for you that Earlene was only half-blind.

Why? She needed that one eye to watch the televison as she was trying to get it to work

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Youtube Interview I Did, Tippit Case
« Reply #80 on: April 29, 2021, 04:58:39 PM »
Why? She needed that one eye to watch the televison as she was trying to get it to work

Too bad for you that Earlene was not paralyzed.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: Youtube Interview I Did, Tippit Case
« Reply #81 on: April 29, 2021, 07:13:47 PM »
Too bad for you that Earlene was not paralyzed.

Too bad that you are incapable to have a normal, rational, conversation about any topic.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Youtube Interview I Did, Tippit Case
« Reply #82 on: April 29, 2021, 09:00:25 PM »
Too bad that you are incapable to have a normal, rational, conversation about any topic.

Not my bad that you treat Earlene as being abnormal & irrational in your 'conversation'. Not my bad that Oswald was seen by Markham (who had two good eyeballs) to be wearing a jacket while killing Tippit. Not my bad that Oswald was seen to be wearing a jacket by a number of witnesses (with two good eyeballs apiece, apparently), either on scene  or nearby. 
« Last Edit: April 29, 2021, 09:02:23 PM by Bill Chapman »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: Youtube Interview I Did, Tippit Case
« Reply #83 on: April 29, 2021, 10:13:06 PM »
Not my bad that you treat Earlene as being abnormal & irrational in your 'conversation'. Not my bad that Oswald was seen by Markham (who had two good eyeballs) to be wearing a jacket while killing Tippit. Not my bad that Oswald was seen to be wearing a jacket by a number of witnesses (with two good eyeballs apiece, apparently), either on scene  or nearby.

But it is your bad that you assume that those witness identifications are 100% perfect despite the fact that (1) witness testimony is actually the most unreliable evidence there is, (2) Roberts and Markham both said the jacket Tippit's killer was wearing was darker than CE 162 and (3) the police called in finding a white jacket under a car.

And too bad for you that, according to Buell Frazier, Oswald was wearing his only grey jacket (CE 162) to Irving on Thursday evening, which means it couldn't have been at the roominghouse on Friday afternoon.

But none of this has anything to do with Bill Brown misrepresenting the facts three times in the first three minutes of his interview.

Perhaps you can tell me where exactly did McWatters testify that "Oswald got on the bus", as Bill Brown claimed he did?
« Last Edit: April 29, 2021, 10:15:39 PM by Martin Weidmann »