Feel Free to Name Your Shooter

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Feel Free to Name Your Shooter  (Read 56240 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Feel Free to Name Your Shooter
« Reply #70 on: April 03, 2018, 12:58:07 AM »
Every single piece of ALL the evidence implicates Oswald.

Bull.  If it did, you would be able to show that, not just claim it.

Offline Paul May

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 908
Re: Feel Free to Name Your Shooter
« Reply #71 on: April 03, 2018, 01:26:25 AM »
It?s been shown and discussed endless times on endless blog forums. Why not simply answer this threads question.  You cannot name a shooter because there is NO evidence pointing to a shooter other than LHO. For one to dispute that 55 years after the crime is insanity. I have said numerous times, one cannot rule with 100% certainty there was not a conspiracy. 99% is good nough for me.

Offline Paul May

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 908
Re: Feel Free to Name Your Shooter
« Reply #72 on: April 03, 2018, 02:35:51 AM »
I wouldn?t bother Tony, that?s the point. There is simply nothing left to discuss re: JFK.  It would be both revolutionary and refreshing to discuss anything new. Has any event EVER in history been as thoroughly researched? I don?t believe so.  So, what are we left with? History says Oswald?s the guy. I can live with that.  Why can?t you?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Feel Free to Name Your Shooter
« Reply #73 on: April 03, 2018, 04:19:35 AM »
It?s been shown and discussed endless times on endless blog forums. Why not simply answer this threads question.  You cannot name a shooter because there is NO evidence pointing to a shooter other than LHO. For one to dispute that 55 years after the crime is insanity. I have said numerous times, one cannot rule with 100% certainty there was not a conspiracy. 99% is good nough for me.

No, it's just been claimed endless times on endless "blog forums" that Oswald did it.  By people who fastidiously avoid the actual evidence just like you do.  You can't get past 50% that Oswald did it, so you have to resort to shifting the burden while claiming a "certainty" that just isn't supported by the evidence.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Feel Free to Name Your Shooter
« Reply #74 on: April 03, 2018, 04:20:14 AM »
I wouldn?t bother Tony, that?s the point. There is simply nothing left to discuss re: JFK.  It would be both revolutionary and refreshing to discuss anything new. Has any event EVER in history been as thoroughly researched? I don?t believe so.  So, what are we left with? History says Oswald?s the guy. I can live with that.  Why can?t you?

Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out then.

Offline Steve Taylor

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: Feel Free to Name Your Shooter
« Reply #75 on: April 03, 2018, 03:11:21 PM »
I've always been partial to the guy withdrawing the rifle on the 2nd floor of the Dal-Tex underneath Dave Morales' butt.


Offline Paul May

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 908
Re: Feel Free to Name Your Shooter
« Reply #76 on: April 04, 2018, 02:44:26 AM »
You cannot possibly be this stupid in real life.  That role is reserved for Caprio.  So, post, as YOU said, the ACTUAL evidence for conspiracy which you claim I ignore.  This will be fun.