Et tu, Bonnie?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Et tu, Bonnie?  (Read 241548 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #343 on: April 20, 2021, 12:49:46 AM »
Yeah, maybe that's what it is Bill.

I was naively assuming that an innocent person being asked to give a statement regarding such a massive event would be doing their best to remember what they did, as opposed to just spouting off the first thing that came into their heads as if it was all some kind of joke.

spout off
to speak out publicly about someone or something; to reveal information publicly about someone or something


Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6026
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #344 on: April 20, 2021, 01:06:05 AM »
Yeah, maybe that's what it is Bill.

I was naively assuming that an innocent person being asked to give a statement regarding such a massive event would be doing their best to remember what they did, as opposed to just spouting off the first thing that came into their heads as if it was all some kind of joke.

Perhaps he did not immediately realize that his lunch would become the subject of historical interest to later generations.  Do you think he was "in" on the plot with the role to plant the remains of a chicken sandwich?  Colonel Sanders was an alleged racist in his plantation suit.  Perhaps he was behind this sinister plot and offered free sandwiches as an enticement.

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #345 on: April 20, 2021, 01:39:08 AM »
Perhaps he did not immediately realize that his lunch would become the subject of historical interest to later generations.  Do you think he was "in" on the plot with the role to plant the remains of a chicken sandwich?  Colonel Sanders was an alleged racist in his plantation suit.  Perhaps he was behind this sinister plot and offered free sandwiches as an enticement.

It was his presence on the floor just minutes before the shots that was critical information. The problem about his lunch would only become important to him when it was reported widely to have been the assassin's. For all he knew someone might have seen him on the sixth floor and reported (Rowland).

If the lunch sack and bottle were thought to be related to the assassin why did they not travel with Drain along with the other evidence that night?

Pathetic jokes about fowl play and KFC, forgetful minds and horsing around aren’t serious rebuttal to the points raised. Neither is distraction to the fingerprints in the SN. Just a convenient way to move the topic at hand......look over here.

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8236
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #346 on: April 20, 2021, 08:14:47 AM »
Poor Oswald.  What bad luck he had.  Of all the TSBD employees, his are the only ones found on the SN boxes.   And bag. And rifle.  What are the odds?  Just a good old boy going about his business.  His prints on the very boxes used by the assassin to assassinate JFK are "meaningless" and of "no real evidentiary value."   You should be embarrassed and apologize to intelligent people for this type of nonsense.  I'm actually embarrassed for you.

his are the only ones found on the SN boxes

Really? Why don't you stop making things up for once?

Offline Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3775
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #347 on: April 20, 2021, 02:30:32 PM »
Perhaps he did not immediately realize that his lunch would become the subject of historical interest to later generations.  Do you think he was "in" on the plot with the role to plant the remains of a chicken sandwich?  Colonel Sanders was an alleged racist in his plantation suit.  Perhaps he was behind this sinister plot and offered free sandwiches as an enticement.

 ;D
You might be onto something Richard.
Perhaps the whole thing was a publicity stunt for the new KFC Chicken-On-The-Bone Special ["It's teeth-crunchin' good"]

Out of interest, when do you think Williams went down to the 5th floor to join Jarman and Norman?

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6026
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #348 on: April 20, 2021, 02:49:45 PM »
;D
You might be onto something Richard.
Perhaps the whole thing was a publicity stunt for the new KFC Chicken-On-The-Bone Special ["It's teeth-crunchin' good"]

Out of interest, when do you think Williams went down to the 5th floor to join Jarman and Norman?

I don't believe there is any way to know for certain since BRW was not tracking his movements with scientific precision.  He is mostly making an estimate of the time as you see in many instances in this case.  A pedantic analysis of his various statements are somewhat insightful but can never answer the question when he himself didn't really know.  Most people don't go around noting the exact time of every mundane event in their life down to the minute.  What's important is that BRW never suggested that he heard or saw anything unusual.  Any narrative that has him encountering a hit team on the 6th floor and being allowed to go about his business perhaps raising the alarm is absurd.  Instead he goes to the window just below where he knows this is going to happen and puts himself at further risk?  Not plausible.

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6026
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #349 on: April 20, 2021, 03:14:15 PM »
his are the only ones found on the SN boxes

Really? Why don't you stop making things up for once?

So other TSBD employees left their fingerprints on these boxes?  Do tell.