Et tu, Bonnie?

[Alan J. Ford]

At the time he was being questioned in the DPD he knew the following. The shots that had been fired were from above. Those who were on the sixth floor were brought for questioning. Fair chance he knew that was significant. His lunch remnants were up there. By 3pm his lunch was being described as the assassin's. He also saw Oswald in custody. No threat to him but maybe there were conspirators on the loose.

Wonder why he decided to leave his lunch trip out of the statement given its obvious significance?

This just keeps getting better...

Given the photo image shared by Mr. Crow, it's crystal clear that Mr. Williams' stress-level meter is in the red zone as he is obviously contemplating his future amid that unmistakable horrifying look upon his face. What was this man an accomplice to that afternoon?

[Alan J. Ford]

Encouraging to read the tandem of Mr. Crow & Mr. O'meara's keen assessment of this thread's namesake Mr. Williams' obvious waffling, fork-tongued "truth".  Carry on gentlemen.

*Will reread topshelf researcher Mr. Davidson's post (#321) again on Friday and make a response then.

Upon viewing the video he shared wanted to reserve comment until waiting to clarify a couple of contrived timeline points in my notes shared by the lying rooftop tandem...particularly if the rather short man on the extreme right at the 39 sec. mark in the video is Roy Truly...

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ak3JymYrSpzVtF0i-jbAxuRICk9lcZ5q/view

Man what I'd give to find a photo image of a working clock on the wall in the above sequence.

[Richard Smith]

Treasure trove!

Thanks for sharing this insightful post, Mr. Crow, encouraging to read--among other things-- that Lt. Day made it crystal clear that the fingerprints upon that Dr. Pepper bottle did Not belong to the wrongly accused. There's a reason for that...he was nowhere near the scene of the SN.

That some interesting "logic."  Why would Oswald's prints not being on a Dr. Pepper bottle that belonged to someone else preclude his presence in the SN? Oswald's fingerprints were all over the SN boxes. 

[Martin Weidmann]

That some interesting "logic."  Why would Oswald's prints not being on a Dr. Pepper bottle that belonged to someone else have preclude his presence in the SN? Oswald's fingerprints were all over the SN boxes.

Oswald's fingerprints were all over the SN boxes.

Massive exaggeration, as per usual. But so what?

Oswald worked on that floor and handled boxes every day. Besides there were other prints, likely of co-workers and police officers, on those boxes, which were being moved around because of the work that was being done to the floor. Oswald's prints being anywhere on the 6th floor are meaningless and of no real evidentiary value.

[Bill Chapman]

That some interesting "logic."  Why would Oswald's prints not being on a Dr. Pepper bottle that belonged to someone else preclude his presence in the SN? Oswald's fingerprints were all over the SN boxes.

Only one box is needed to nail the little prick:

[Richard Smith]

Oswald's fingerprints were all over the SN boxes.

Massive exaggeration, as per usual. But so what?

Oswald worked on that floor and handled boxes every day. Besides there were other prints, likely of co-workers and police officers, on those boxes, which were being moved around because of the work that was being done to the floor. Oswald's prints being anywhere on the 6th floor are meaningless and of no real evidentiary value.

Poor Oswald.  What bad luck he had.  Of all the TSBD employees, his are the only ones found on the SN boxes.   And bag. And rifle.  What are the odds?  Just a good old boy going about his business.  His prints on the very boxes used by the assassin to assassinate JFK are "meaningless" and of "no real evidentiary value."   You should be embarrassed and apologize to intelligent people for this type of nonsense.  I'm actually embarrassed for you.

[Bill Chapman]

Yeah, maybe that's what it is Bill.

I was naively assuming that an innocent person being asked to give a statement regarding such a massive event would be doing their best to remember what they did, as opposed to just spouting off the first thing that came into their heads as if it was all some kind of joke.

spout off
to speak out publicly about someone or something; to reveal information publicly about someone or something