Et tu, Bonnie?

[Bill Chapman]

And any fool who wasn't there himself can claim, without a shred of evidence, that the witness was wrong and that the bag was actually bigger.

Any witness with a possible cya motive can manipulate the evidence.

[Martin Weidmann]

Any witness with a possible cya motive can manipulate the evidence.

Just like any investigator who wants to arrive at a predetermined conclusion

[Bill Chapman]

Frazier's day one description of the bag on the back seat is quite specific to the appearance of the bag. Folded at both ends. One over and one under. How does that detail relate to your offering?

There remains some confusion as to whether by 'bottom', Buell meant lengthwise or end

[Colin Crow]

There remains some confusion as to whether by 'bottom', Buell meant lengthwise or end

From the first day affidavit.

"It must have been about 2' long, and the top of the sack was sort of folded up, and the rest of the sack had been kind of folded under."

Whatever your interpretation of his description, can you provide any image of the bag known as CE 142 that could match it?

[Bill Chapman]

Just like any investigator who wants to arrive at a predetermined conclusion

I said a possible cya motive.

[Bill Chapman]

From the first day affidavit.

"It must have been about 2' long, and the top of the sack was sort of folded up, and the rest of the sack had been kind of folded under."

Whatever your interpretation of his description, can you provide any image of the bag known as CE 142 that could match it?

Can you provide a non-relative to confirm Buell's description of the bag?

[Martin Weidmann]

Can you provide a non-relative to confirm Buell's description of the bag?

Can you provide a non-relative of Bledsoe to confirm she was on the bus?
Can you provide a non-relative of Roberts to confirm that she saw Oswald put on a jacket?
Can you provide a non-relative of Brennan to confirm he really saw a man looking like Oswald in the TSBD window?

And so on.....