Was Hickey's AR15 in burst mode?

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

It's about time this came up again as it is so important. It does like a complete bullet buried itself there and compressed along its centerline (looks like you can actually see the flattened bullet there).
Obviously not a fragment of a bullet fired from the 6th floor of the TSBD (downward shot).

The windscreen impact/hole happened earlier because we can see it in the Altgens photo (at the moment of the back/neck shot) - so not from the theorised Hickey accident.
So which shot caused that windscreen impact LNers?

There are lots of youtubes showing an AR15 etc hollow point impakting a flat plate peeling into lots of radial fingers plus much lead splatter plus almost zero remnant slug.
The cracked windshield glass was made by the remnant slug of the jfk headshot (Hickey's last shot).
An Oswald fragment could not have caused the crack nor the dent (these would need a giant veer)(in jfk's head).

[John Mytton]

  SA Hickey is alleged to have stood up from his seated position while also turning at the waist. The AR-15 in his hands would have been pointed in several different directions during this same time period.

JohnM

[John Mytton]

The windscreen impact/hole happened earlier because we can see it in the Altgens photo (at the moment of the back/neck shot) - so not from the theorised Hickey accident.
So which shot caused that windscreen impact LNers?

Hi Jim, could you please point out where you see the "windscreen impact/hole" in Altgens 6, because I'm having trouble matching up a corresponding "windscreen impact/hole" with the actual photo taken of the "windscreen impact/hole" later that evening?



The corresponding crack can be seen in Altgens 7!



And in the Oklahoma City Times newspaper later that day, Altgens 7 with the same corroborating crack, was front page news.



JohnM

[Jim Hawthorn]

Hi Jim, could you please point out where you see the "windscreen impact/hole" in Altgens 6, because I'm having trouble matching up a corresponding "windscreen impact/hole" with the actual photo taken of the "windscreen impact/hole" later that evening?

Hi John, I don't have your talent for photo illustration but the arrow here indicates the impact point viewed from the front and rear. There was a theory that what we see from the front view is part of someone behind JFK's shoulder, which seems like a good explanation, but hey presto, that light coloured zone matches the position (and the shape somewhat) of the impact viewed from the rear. What a coincidence.

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

Hi John, I don't have your talent for photo illustration but the arrow here indicates the impact point viewed from the front and rear. There was a theory that what we see from the front view is part of someone behind JFK's shoulder, which seems like a good explanation, but hey presto, that light coloured zone matches the position (and the shape somewhat) of the impact viewed from the rear. What a coincidence.

that is a white glove on the hand of an african american lady.
That is a lady holding a white handbag.

[Jim Hawthorn]

that is a white glove on the hand of an african american lady.

Ah. Is there another photo showing said gloved lady?

[John Mytton]

Hi John, I don't have your talent for photo illustration but the arrow here indicates the impact point viewed from the front and rear. There was a theory that what we see from the front view is part of someone behind JFK's shoulder, which seems like a good explanation, but hey presto, that light coloured zone matches the position (and the shape somewhat) of the impact viewed from the rear. What a coincidence.

1. For a start, I don't think they are even close to be in relative similar positions.
2. Secondly your crack looks to be too big and not the right shape.
3. And thirdly and most importantly, from Altgens' position, the left side of you crack is bordered by the mirror and the bottom of the crack is bordered by the top of Kennedy's shoulder.
4 Which fourthly means that your "crack" is simply a white object behind.



JohnM