Was Hickey's AR15 in burst mode?

[Royell Storing]

Then how come Powers and O' Donnell don't mention it?

    They FAIL to mention the SIREN Too! Politicos frequently go deaf, dumb, and blind when things get dicey. They talk a good game, but when it comes time to pony up, they are MIA.

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

   You're ASSUMING the head shot was from the AR-15. You have no proof of this.
    Have you stood SA Hickey up in the rear of the Limo and figured out the level the AR-15 would have to be at for a shot to pass UNDER the divider? These SS Agents are not pee-wees. You stand Hickey up inside the Limo and that rifle would have to be held LOW. Very Low to fire a shot UNDER the divider.

U should read the earlier bits of this thread, re the height of the AR15 (& divider).

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

Provide a single piece of hard evidence that an invisible unicorn didn't take the head shot.
The fact of the matter is you can't.

You're whole theory is built on the fact that there was no picture taken that can refute it.
And that's all there is to it.
Of course you can't provide a sensible/rational/credible explanation for why nobody in the follow-up car saw or heard the AR-15 firing.
The sensible/rational/credible explanation is that no such shots were taken.
Of course you can't provide a sensible/rational/credible explanation for why over 20 witnesses on either side of the limo at the time of the head shot never saw or heard the AR-15 firing.
The sensible/rational/credible explanation is that no such shots were fired.

Remember this - you cannot provide hard evidence that an invisible unicorn didn't take the head shot.
That's the level you are working at. That's how credible your theory is.
Your theory suffers from a complete absence of Common Sense.

The hard evidence is the headshot. And cracked windshield. And the dent in chrome trim. And Tague's wound. And Bronson's footage (showing Hickey rise up, & falling). And Bell's footage (showing Hickey holding AR15 all the way to the tup). Smell of gunpowder in Elm & on Stemmons & at Parkland. And AR15 taken out of service in less than a day, & no AR15 has been used by SS since (they use tommy guns only).

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

Then how come Powers and O' Donnell don't mention it?

O'Donnell lied re not hearing AR15. Powers did not lie re hearing AR15 (he did not deny hearing AR15).

[Dan O'meara]

    They FAIL to mention the SIREN Too! Politicos frequently go deaf, dumb, and blind when things get dicey. They talk a good game, but when it comes time to pony up, they are MIA.

Is this supposed to be a credible explanation?
Both men were incredibly close friends of JFK. Why would they choose to "go deaf, dumb, and blind"?
Why did none of the witnesses on either side of the limo see or hear the AR-15 firing?
Why did no-one see it?
Why did no-one hear it?

[Royell Storing]

O'Donnell lied re not hearing AR15. Powers did not lie re hearing AR15 (he did not deny hearing AR15).

         Now you are claiming O'Donnell lied? And that Powers must have heard the AR-15 because he did not deny it? This would be opinion and faulty logic, not proof. You're grasping at straws as your entire theory collapses all around you.

[Dan O'meara]

O'Donnell lied re not hearing AR15. Powers did not lie re hearing AR15 (he did not deny hearing AR15).

Both men were incredibly close friends of JFK. O' Donnell was a close family friend of the Kennedy's. Why would he lie?
Neither man reported the AR-15 firing.
Nobody reports the AR-15 firing.
Not one single witness.
Zero evidence the AR-15 was fired.
A theory built on literally nothing.