One poster created 52 percent of our 208 threads. A concern? Do we have to beg?

[Tom Scully]

Incorrect. I have never seen you cite the evidence. You can't because you either don't know it or you realize that it doesn't support your claims. There is no reason not to cite evidence IF you have it. This is simply a cop out because you don't want to admit that you have none.

John Iacoletti gave an accurate description of what you do here.:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150508145751/http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com:80/index.php?topic=5132.48


....and, in the now lost Zangretti fable promotion thread you authored, this was your reaction to my original research which overwhelmingly impeached
Penn Jones's fairytale.: (You had been shilling that Penn Jones BS since at least 2008.: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/alt.conspiracy.jfk/MgvVGfm6RtU )



I put that BS out of its misery, even as you resorted to your denial (Sgt. Schultz) mode.:
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,32.msg3289.html#msg3289
Re: Was Jack Zangretti Off Base Or Not?
? Reply #9 on: January 31, 2018, 02:21:55 AM.....

[Ray Mitcham]

But Oswald wasn't seen in the 6th floor window with a gun in his hand so he didn't do it.

Nearly as stupid as the Ln mantra...." But Oswald wasn't seen in the 6th floor window with a gun in his hand so he did do it."

[John Anderson]

 

[Richard Smith]

Unfortunately, 72 threads have been created by one poster with a penchant for never correcting an
inaccuracy or conceding, even in the face of overwhelming posted evidence, that he is mistaken.

A compulsion disorder for minutiae is often a characteristic shared by CTers.  Like posting reams of random information or charts with all sorts of arrows going every direction.  Sound familiar?  The CTer brain has difficulty processing details and confuses them for knowledge.  Thus, if enough details are posted they must add up to something.  What exactly they never say.  It is simply implied by the mass of information posted.

[John Iacoletti]

But Oswald wasn't seen in the 6th floor window with a gun in his hand so he didn't do it.

But Oswald left his ring in a cup, so he did it.

[John Iacoletti]

As I've posted before. Brennan got the shooters location right so he obviously saw something.

That's a circular argument.  Nobody (not even Brennan) claimed to see any shots fired from that location.

The detail he provides is exaggerated though in my opinion.

Agreed.  I'm not sure why most LNers won't even concede this.

[John Iacoletti]

A compulsion disorder for minutiae is often a characteristic shared by CTers.  Like posting reams of random information or charts with all sorts of arrows going every direction.  Sound familiar?  The CTer brain has difficulty processing details and confuses them for knowledge.  Thus, if enough details are posted they must add up to something.  What exactly they never say.  It is simply implied by the mass of information posted.

You should just accept Richard's conclusions as fact and not bother with any of that "evidence" stuff.  It's too hard.