Did Captain Fritz show Mr Oswald a Mauser?

[Bill Chapman]

1) JFK 'murder' lol. Tell us just how important one has to be before one's 'murder' gets bumped up to 'assassination' status. Just sayin'.

Pathetic. No matter what you call it, Kennedy was murdered, was he not?

2) Where did I 'admit' that I was not familiar with dealing with the nuances of the law' you fkn liar? I clearly said those not familiar

You admitted it implicitly in your previous post, as you clearly wrote that as being one of "those not familiar". But I can understand why you now want to backpeddle.

3) You dismiss that which does not follow Oswald-Cultism

BS, but I'll play along.... Tell me, how do you explain that I accept the BY photos as authentic and that it is very will possible that Oswald did indeed write the order form from Klein's for the purchase of the rifle?

4) Opinions are usually welcome on discussion platforms

When they are not falsely presented as statements of fact, I agree.

Pathetic. No matter what you call it, Kennedy was murdered, was he not?
Geez, and here I thought he was assassinated, a more apt description for heads of state.
You wouldn't be trying to minimize the importance of what your hero Oswald did, now would you..

You admitted it implicitly in your previous post, as you clearly wrote that as being one of "those not familiar". But I can understand why you now want to backpeddle.
1) Re 'those not familiar': I can understand your need to twist what others mean.
2) I do not include myself with those who are unfamiliar with the basics of watching what one says around cops. I include myself with the guy who authored and presented the video.

BS, but I'll play along.... Tell me, how do you explain that I accept the BY photos as authentic and that it is very will possible that Oswald did indeed write the order form from Klein's for the purchase of the rifle?
So that's it, no Marty53?. Let me go all-CT: You're lying about accepting the BY pictures and the Klein's thing in order to present yourself as fair, but in reality you're just the same old tipsy troll who only comes here to argue.

When they are not falsely presented as statements of fact, I agree
  Again, this is a discussion platform, not a court of law nor even formal debate. And you are not the arbiter of what constitutes 'fact'.

[Alan Ford]

"Oswald told Frazier that the bag he brought to work that day contained curtain rods he obtained from Mrs. Paine. Many conspiracy theorists contend that Oswald did have curtain rods. The question then becomes: could the bag have contained curtain rods and not the rifle, regardless of length?

There were indeed curtain rods in the garage of the Paine residence, but both Mr. and Mrs. Paine testified their curtain rods were still in their garage on the day of the assassination after Oswald had taken his "curtain rods" to work. Oswald did not ask Mrs. Paine if he could use her curtain rods. Oswald did not discuss redecorating his room with his wife. He did not get the needed permission from his landlady, Mrs. Arthur Johnson, or her husband, to hang curtain rods and both testified there was no need for curtain rods in his room as there were curtain rods already up."

Source/link: http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/bag.htm

Oswald's room needed no rods. He had no apartment that needed rods. He had not looked for an apartment that needed rods. There is no evidence from any eyewitnesses that saw him with rods after he left the building. He denied to the police, according to their account, that he brought rods to work.

Or you can believe all of this were lies meant to frame him. In which case, it doesn't matter how much evidence is presented; you will dismiss it all as lies.

Speaking of curtain rods and evidence.......

Two curtain rods were submitted for testing for Mr Oswald's fingerprints 8 days BEFORE two curtain rods were taken from the Paine garage under on-the-record questioning of Ms Paine. The two curtain rods originally submitted for testing were not released from the Crime Scene Search Section lab until AFTER that taking of testimony in Irving.

Can you explain the above facts, Mr Galbraith? Or do you prefer to stay in your McAdams/von Pein Talking Points comfort zone?

 

[Martin Weidmann]

Pathetic. No matter what you call it, Kennedy was murdered, was he not?
Geez, and here I thought he was assassinated, a more apt description for heads of state.
You wouldn't be trying to minimize the importance of what your hero Oswald did, now would you..

Assassination is murder for political reasons. Was Kennedy killed for political reasons and wouldn't that point to a conspiracy?
I thought you believe some lone nut with a rifle killed a guy in a car, which of course is murder, plain and simple.

You wouldn't be trying to minimize the importance of what your hero Oswald did, now would you..

Thank you for demonstrating so clearly how your warped depraved mind works.

You admitted it implicitly in your previous post, as you clearly wrote that as being one of "those not familiar". But I can understand why you now want to backpeddle.
1) Re 'those not familiar': I can understand your need to twist what others mean.
2) I do not include myself with those who are unfamiliar with the basics of watching what one says around cops. I include myself with the guy who authored and presented the video.

Of course you include yourself with those who are unfamiliar with the basics. Your words;

"The video was made for the express intent of enlightening those not familiar with the nuances of dealing with the law"

"it was one of the most important and interesting videos I've ever watched and would be of great benefit to everybody."

No further explanation necessary!

BS, but I'll play along.... Tell me, how do you explain that I accept the BY photos as authentic and that it is very will possible that Oswald did indeed write the order form from Klein's for the purchase of the rifle?
So that's it, no Marty53?. Let me go all-CT: You're lying about accepting the BY pictures and the Klein's thing in order to present yourself as fair, but in reality you're just the same old tipsy troll who only comes here to argue.

Thank you for showing one more time how a LN mind really works. When somebody you claim to be a CT (but isn't) actually tells you the truth, you call him a liar and start projecting because you don't know how to handle the truth. It's pathetic!

When they are not falsely presented as statements of fact, I agree
  Again, this is a discussion platform, not a court of law nor even formal debate. And you are not the arbiter of what constitutes 'fact'.

Then try to discuss something for once, little man, instead of taking a page out of Trump's "alternative facts" book!

And you are not the arbiter of what constitutes 'fact'.
 
Sure I am. Every time a troll like you tries to pass opinion as "fact".

[Bill Chapman]

Assassination is murder for political reasons. Was Kennedy killed for political reasons and wouldn't that point to a conspiracy?

You're rather slow on the uptake, Martini. I reckon you've been spending way too much time with your drinking buddies Tom Collins, Jack Daniels, and Jim Beam. And Captain Morgan.

I've already schooled you lot with my essay 'the nobody who shot the somebody had help' In short:
1) O H Lee was in charge of procuring a safe-house
2) Alek Hidell was in charge of procuring armaments
3) Dirty Harvey was in charge of making the nobody a somebody

Well, they'll remember him now. 

[Martin Weidmann]

You're rather slow on the uptake, Martini. I reckon you've been spending way too much time with your drinking buddies Tom Collins, Jack Daniels, and Jim Beam. And Captain Morgan.

I've already schooled you lot with my essay 'the nobody who shot the somebody had help' In short:
1) O H Lee was in charge of procuring a safe-house
2) Alek Hidell was in charge of procuring armaments
3) Dirty Harvey was in charge of making the nobody a somebody

Well, they'll remember him now. 

Sticks and stones.... But thank you for demonstrating again how your warped depraved mind works.

If this is the best come back you've got, you really haven't got anything. But hey, what else is new?

[Bill Chapman]

Sticks and stones.... But thank you for demonstrating again how your warped depraved mind works.

If this is the best come back you've got, you really haven't got anything. But hey, what else is new?

No 'best' needed: I'm just ragging the puck with you lot.

*Rag-the-puck meaning (hockey) To retain possession of the puck by skillful skating and stickhandling without attempting to score

[Martin Weidmann]

No 'best' needed: I'm just ragging the puck with you lot.

*Rag-the-puck meaning (hockey) To retain possession of the puck by skillful skating and stickhandling without attempting to score

Ah... there are the usual delusions of grandeur