Did Captain Fritz show Mr Oswald a Mauser?

[John Iacoletti]

Who would those "certain people" be "Chapman"?
Lamers who don't realize the very real dangers of ID theft
My name itself is so common it doesn't need disguising.

Another name for those people is "keyboard warrior cowards".

I don't have an "atheist space on YouTube", Mr. Research.  But it's cute that you're trying
In case you're running your 'exact word' schtict again: TAE is/was an atheist space. Owning it or not, broadcasting from it or not, still there or not.

So what?  Do you just like pointing out the things that I do, or is there some point?

The t-shirt you speak of was made for me by the producer.  It was a "game of thrones" motif, but I have never seen that show, so the reference was lost on me.  Other crew members got similar shirts.  This was also several years ago.  But it had nothing to do with seeking attention.
So then how was I to know you didn't get the t-shirt on your own.

What the hell difference does it make?  Are observations of my clothing supposed to somehow contribute to discussion about the JFK assassination?  What am I saying...you never contribute to discussions about the JFK assassination.  All you do is divert and troll.

[Bill Chapman]

Another name for those people is "keyboard warrior cowards".

So what?  Do you just like pointing out the things that I do, or is there some point?

What the hell difference does it make?  Are observations of my clothing supposed to somehow contribute to discussion about the JFK assassination?  What am I saying...you never contribute to discussions about the JFK assassination.  All you do is divert and troll.

Another name for those people is "keyboard warrior cowards"
What a quaint notion: That knowing a person’s real name is somehow more honest or even important. Maybe you’re the nosey one after all.

So what?  Do you just like pointing out the things that I do, or is there some point?
The point is that you started the ‘attention-seeker’ theme. And I’m pushing back.

What the hell difference does it make?  Are observations of my clothing supposed to somehow contribute to discussion about the JFK assassination?
One is not discussing the assassination at this juncture; One is discussing the ‘attention-seeker’ theme you originated.

What am I saying...you never contribute to discussions about the JFK assassination.  All you do is divert and troll.
Not my bad if one finds oneself ‘diverted’. Maybe one is too far down one’s personal rabbit-hole.

[John Iacoletti]

Another name for those people is "keyboard warrior cowards"
What a quaint notion: That knowing a person’s real name is somehow more honest or even important. Maybe you’re the nosey one after all.

It's way easier to be a "courageous" troll if you think you're anonymous.

So what?  Do you just like pointing out the things that I do, or is there some point?
The point is that you started the ‘attention-seeker’ theme. And I’m pushing back.

Push away.  Everything you post on this forum screams "look at me!".

One is not discussing the assassination at this juncture; One is discussing the ‘attention-seeker’ theme you originated.

"One" never discusses the assassination.  Other than to make blanket unsubstantiated pronouncements about it.

[Walt Cakebread]

It's way easier to be a "courageous" troll if you think you're anonymous.

Push away.  Everything you post on this forum screams "look at me!".

"One" never discusses the assassination.  Other than to make blanket unsubstantiated pronouncements about it.

"One" never discusses the assassination.  Other than to make blanket unsubstantiated pronouncements about it.

"blanket unsubstantiated pronouncements"

Isn't that the hallmark of a liar?

[Bill Chapman]

It's way easier to be a "courageous" troll if you think you're anonymous.

Push away.  Everything you post on this forum screams "look at me!".

"One" never discusses the assassination.  Other than to make blanket unsubstantiated pronouncements about it.

'Courageous' about what exactly?

Everything you post on this forum is encapsulated in the image of you kneeling at Oswald's grave... and screams 'Look at Lee and me!

Some 'discuss' the assassination as if nothing is knowable, provable or believable. But yet, eternally capable of being faked, planted, or altered in some way. The ultimate conspiracy-monger security blanket.

[Bill Chapman]

"One" never discusses the assassination.  Other than to make blanket unsubstantiated pronouncements about it.

"blanket unsubstantiated pronouncements"

Isn't that the hallmark of a liar?

The hallmark of a liar around here is you. The one with the bucketful of fabrications assigned by one of your own kind, no less.

[Walt Cakebread]

The hallmark of a liar around here is you, the one with the bucketful of fabrications assigned by one of your own kind.

Even if you're not bright enough to understand many of the points I make....You should be able to understand that the in situ photo of the rifle is a fake. That in situ photo was created by the DPD to support the lie that their patsy and the arch villain Lee Harrrrrvey Osssssswald ( booo Hissss) had dashed by the spot at the top of the stairs and hastily dumped the rifle as he fled.


The very idea that an escaping assassin would carry the rifle   all the way across the sixth floor before dumping it is ridiculous.

There were dozens of other better hiding places on the sixth floor.